Threshold Concepts in Digital Storytelling: Naming What We Know About Storywork

  • Brooke Hessler
  • Joe Lambert
Chapter

Abstract

Community-engaged educators have incorporated digital storytelling into academic courses and public workshops for over two decades. Reflecting on their own praxes, Hessler and Lambert invite facilitators and researchers to deepen current discussions about digital storytelling as a transformative pedagogy and as a form of critically reflective literacy. To advance this dialogue, they suggest applying the lens of Meyer and Land’s threshold concepts, an approach used in the scholarship of teaching and learning to identify core and “troublesome” knowledge across the disciplinary spectrum. Noting that the most salient principles and practices concern the underlying “storywork” of digital storytelling, the authors offer eight assertions as potential threshold concepts. The most foundational and, they argue, the most radical is Every Story Matters.

References

  1. Adler-Kassner, L., & Wardle, E. (2015). Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, B. (2011). The new digital storytelling: Creating narratives with new media. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Anson, C. (2015). Crossing thresholds: What’s to know about writing across the curriculum? In L. Adler-Kassner & E. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies (pp. 203–219). Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  4. Association of American Colleges & Universities (AAC&U). (2015). VALUE: Valid assessment of learning in undergraduate education. Retrieved August 1, 2016, from https://www.aacu.org/value
  5. Bailey, B. (2011). “When I make a film, it’s out of my head”: Expressing emotion and healing through digital filmmaking in the classroom. Digital Culture and Education (3). Retrieved from http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/volume-3/
  6. Berlin, J. A. (1996). Rhetorics, poetics, and cultures: Refiguring college English studies. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brooke, C. (2013). New media pedagogy. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper Taggart, K. Schick, & H. B. Hessler (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (2nd ed., pp. 177–193). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dunford, M., & Jenkins, T. (2015). Understanding the media literacy of digital storytelling. Media Education Research Journal, 5(2), 26–41.Google Scholar
  9. Eyler, J., & Giles Jr., D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Fleckenstein, K. S. (2010). Vision, rhetoric, and social action in the composition classroom. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, R., & Newman, D. (2014). Testing a digital storytelling intervention to reduce stress in adolescent females. Storytelling, Self, Society, 10(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregori-Signes, C., & Brigido-Corcachan, A. M. (Eds.). (2014). Appraising digital storytelling across educational contexts. Valencia: University of Valencia Press.Google Scholar
  15. Haigh, C., & Hardy, P. (2011). Tell me a story—A conceptual exploration of storytelling in healthcare education. Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 408–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hessler, H. B., & Rupiper Taggart, A. (2004). Reciprocal expertise: Community service and the writing group. In B. J. Moss, N. P. Highberg, & M. Nicolas (Eds.), Writing groups inside and outside the classroom (pp. 95–112). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Hull, G. A. (2003). At last: Youth culture and digital media: new literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229–233.Google Scholar
  18. Hull, G. A., & Katz, M. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.Google Scholar
  19. Jamissen, G., & Holte Haug, K. (2014). Towards the digital storytelling university. In C. Gregori-Signes & A. M. Brigido-Corcachan (Eds.), Appraising digital storytelling across educational contexts (pp. 93–113). Valencia: University of Valencia Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jamissen, G., & Skou, G. (2010). Poetic reflection through digital storytelling: A methodology to foster professional health worker identity in students. International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 6(2), 177–191.Google Scholar
  21. Kegan, R. (1983). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kidd, J. (2005). Capture Wales: Digital storytelling at the BBC. Wales Media Journal, 2, 66–85.Google Scholar
  24. Lambert, J. (2013). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. McComiskey, B. (2002). Ideology and critique in composition studies. JAC, 22(1), 167–175.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Baillie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  28. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Misorelli, C., & Worcman, K. (2016). People, stories, and museums: Museu da Pessoa, Sao Paolo, Brazil. International Digital Storytelling Festival. Cape Town Peninsula University of Technology. Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  31. Palmeri, J. (2012). Remixing composition: A history of multimodal writing pedagogy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Scharmer, C. O. (2009). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  33. Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? The Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism, and Practice, 1(4). Retrieved from http://www.lesley.edu/journal-pedagogy-pluralism-practice/ira-shor/critical-literacy/
  34. Tate, G., Rupiper Taggart, A., Schick, K., & Hessler, H. B. (2013). A guide to composition pedagogies (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brooke Hessler
    • 1
  • Joe Lambert
    • 2
  1. 1.California College of the ArtsOaklandUSA
  2. 2.StoryCenterBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations