The Perspectives of Older People on Digital Gaming: Interactions with Console and Tablet-Based Games

  • Suriati Khartini JaliEmail author
  • Sylvester Arnab
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 176)


The paper aims to investigate the correlation between the challenges associated with older people, their existing engagement with digital gaming, the andragogical perspectives and existing game design attributes. A pilot study was performed with 14 participants aged 55 and above. Data was collected from their interactions with and experiences of digital gaming. Questionnaires and group discussions were performed to collect feedback and perspectives on the experience. Preliminary results demonstrated that older people’s initial perspectives and perceptions towards digital gaming and gameplay were influenced by perceived or assumed difficulties, relevance and benefits. Furthermore, the participants’ perspectives and attitudes changed once they have broken the confidence barrier associated to engaging with new technologies and experienced the enjoyment from the social aspects of the engagement. They have also demonstrated renewed interest in digital games, and understanding of the potential of using digital games for achieving serious purposes, such as promoting a healthy lifestyle.


Older people Andragogy Digital game Interaction Experience 



This research is funded by Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) and the Ministry of Education Malaysia. Thanks to all participants for taking part in the study.


  1. 1.
    Weisman, S.: Computer games for the frail elderly. Gerontologist 23(4), 361–363 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitcomb, G.R.: Computer games for the elderly. ACM SIGGAS Comput. Soc. 20(3), 112–115 (1990). Rosenberg, R.S. (ed.). ACM, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ijsselsteijn, W., Nap, H.H., de Kort, Y., Poels, K.: Digital game design for elderly users. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play, pp. 17–22. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flores, E., Tobon, G., Cavallaro, E., Cavallaro, F.I., Perry, J.C., Keller, T.: Improving patient motivation in game development for motor deficit rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, pp. 381–384. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gamberini, L., Raya, M.A., Barresi, G., Fabregat, M., Ibanez, F., Prontu, L.: Cognition, technology and games for the elderly: an introduction to ELDERGAMES project. Psychnology J. 4(3), 285–308 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gerling, K.M., Masuch, M.: When gaming is not suitable for everyone: playtesting wii games with frail elderly. In: 1st Workshop on Game Accessibility: Xtreme Interaction Design (GAXID 2011) (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerling, K.M., Schild, J., Masuch, M.: Exergame design for elderly users: the case study of SilverBalance. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, pp. 66–69. ACM, November 2010Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Entertainment Software Association (ESA), Essential Facts about the Computer and Video Game Industry (2011).
  9. 9.
    Pearce, C.: The truth about baby boomer gamers a study of over-forty computer game players. Games Cult. 3(2), 142–174 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nap, H.H., Kort, Y.D., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Senior gamers: preferences, motivations and needs. Gerontechnology 8(4), 247–262 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nacke, L.E., Nacke, A., Lindley, C.A.: Brain training for silver gamers: effects of age and game form on effectiveness, efficiency, self-assessment, and gameplay experience. CyberPsychol. Behav. 12(5), 493–499 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Schutter, B., Vanden Abeele, V.: Meaningful play in elderly life. In: Proceedings of ICA (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerling, K.M., Schulte, F.P., Smeddinck, J., Masuch, M.: Game design for older adults: effects of age-related changes on structural elements of digital games. In: Herrlich, M., Malaka, R., Masuch, M. (eds.) ICEC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7522, pp. 235–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33542-6_20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Romero, N., Sturm, J., Bekker, T., De Valk, L., Kruitwagen, S.: Playful persuasion to support older adults’ social and physical activities. Interact. Comput. 22(6), 485–495 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knowles, M.S.: Associates: Andragogy in Action. Applying Modern Principles of Adult Education. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1984)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanaka, K., Parker, J.R., Baradoy, G., Sheehan, D., Holash, J.R., Katz, L.: A comparison of exergaming interfaces for use in rehabilitation programs and research. J. Can. Game Stud. Assoc. 6(9), 69–81 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khoo, E.T., Lee, S.P., Cheok, A.D., Kodagoda, S., Zhou, Y., Toh, G.S.: Age invaders: social and physical inter-generational family entertainment. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 243–246. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keyani, P., Hsieh, G., Mutlu, B., Easterday, M., Forlizzi, J.: DanceAlong: supporting positive social exchange and exercise for the elderly through dance. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1541–1544. ACM (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Serious Games Institute, Coventry University Technology ParkCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
  2. 2.Disruptive Media Learning Lab, Frederick Lanchester LibraryCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations