Abstract
A well-documented ‘achievement gap’ in the learning of students in in urban and rural schools has emerged as a significant policy problem both in China and other developing societies. Causes for this problem have been traced to differences in physical, fiscal and human resources. This chapter examines human resource differences related to leadership and teacher learning in urban and rural schools in China. The mixed methods study first analyzes quantitatively leadership-teacher learning processes in a sample of 31 urban and rural schools. After establishing differences in the ‘strength’ of learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning between the two groups of schools, we present qualitative case studies of an urban and a rural school. The case study descriptions are designed to ‘fill out’ the broad quantitative findings by offering examples of how learning-centered leadership practices were enacted in the very different contexts. The chapter offers useful insights into a key policy issue in China and also contributes to our broader understanding of how context shapes the enactment of school leadership in different settings.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The flipped classroom is a pedagogical model in which the typical lecture and homework elements of a course are reversed. Short video lectures are viewed by students at home before the class session, while in-class time is devoted to exercises, projects, or discussions. ( https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli7081.pdf).
References
Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Belchetz, D., & Leithwood, K. (2007). Successful leadership: Does context matter and if so, how? In C. Day & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bush, T., Coleman, M., & Xiaohong, S. (1998). Managing secondary schools in China. Compare, 28, 183–195.
Chen, P., Lee, C. D., Lin, H., & Zhang, C. X. (2016). Factors that develop effective professional learning communities in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36, 248–265.
Cravens, X. C. (2008). The cross-cultural fit of the learning-centered leadership framework and assessment for Chinese principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66, 46–53.
Day, C. (2009). Capacity building through layered leadership: Sustaining the turnaround. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership (pp. 121–137). Dordrecht: Springer.
Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and ‘quality education’ in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 241–249.
Ding, G. (2010). National survey and policy analysis for teacher professional development in primary and secondary schools. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
Frost, D. (2006). The concept of ‘agency’ in leadership for learning. Leading & Managing, 12, 19–28.
Goldring, E., Huff, J., Spillane, J. P., & Barnes, C. (2009). Measuring the learning-centered leadership expertise of school principals. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8, 197–228.
Grobman, H., & Hynes, V. (1956). What makes a good principal? NASSP Bulletin, 40(223), 5–16.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Hult, G. T. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 125–142.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157–191.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), ` international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 9–40). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 1–27.
Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and leadership in educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 34, 98–116.
Hallinger, P., & Lu, J. F. (2014). Modeling the effects of principal leadership and school capacity on teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership and Management, 35, 481–501.
Hallinger, P., & Liu, S. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in urban and rural schools in China: Meeting the dual challenges of equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 163–173
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355.
Hallinger, P., Lee, M. S., & Ko, J. (2014). Exploring the impact of school principals on teacher professional communities in Hong Kong. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13, 229–259.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2014). Modeling the effects of school leadership on teaching and learning over time. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 653–681.
Hökkä, P. (2012). Teacher educators amid conflicting demands: Tensions between individual and organizational development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
Hwang, A., Francesco, A. M., & Kessler, E. (2003). The relationship between individualism-collectivism, face, and feedback and learning processes in Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 72–91.
in de Wal, J. J., den Brok, P. J., Hooijer, J. G., Martens, R. L., & van den Beemt, A. (2014). Teachers’ engagement in professional learning: Exploring motivational profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 27–36.
Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Honig, M. I., Plecki, M. L., & Portin, B. S. (2010). Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: Meaning and practice in urban systems. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
Lai, C., Li, Z., & Gong, Y. (2016). Teacher agency and professional learning in cross-cultural teaching contexts: Accounts of Chinese teachers from international schools in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 12–21.
Lee, M., & Hallinger, P. (2012). National contexts influencing principals’ time use and allocation: Economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 461–482.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 201–227.
Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 671–706.
Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Modeling the effects of principal leadership and school capacity on teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 30, 76–100.
Little, J. W. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 22–46). London: Routledge.
Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016a). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: Does trust matter? Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 661–682.
Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016b). Motivating teachers to learn in China: Does leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Printy, S. M., Marks, H. M., & Bowers, A. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 504–532.
Qian, H., & Walker, A. (2013). How principals promote and understand teacher development under curriculum reform in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 304–315.
Qian, H., Walker, A., & Xiaowei, Y. (2016). Building and leading a learning culture among teachers: A case study of a Shanghai primary school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. doi:10.1741143215623785.
Robinson, V. M. (2006). Putting education back into educational leadership. Leading and Managing, 12(1), 62–76.
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. WhitePlains: Longman.
Saphier, J., King, M., & D’Auria, J. (2006). Three strands form strong school leadership. Journal of Staff Development, 27, 51–57.
Shen, X. Y. (2015). Institutional legitimacy, teacher agency, and the development of teacher teaching expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Beijing Normal University, Beijing.
Sleegers, P., Thoonen, E., J. Oort, F., & Peetsma, T. (2014). Changing classroom practices: The role of school-wide capacity for sustainable improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 617–652.
Tang, S. B., Lu, J. F., & Hallinger, P. (2014). Leading school change in China: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 655–675.
Thomsen, M., Karsten, S., & Oort, F. J. (2015). Social exchange in Dutch schools for vocational education and training: The role of teachers’ trust in colleagues, the supervisor and higher management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43, 755–771.
Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 441–460.
Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217–247.
Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Relating school leadership to perceived professional learning community characteristics: A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 26–38.
Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458–495.
Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2002). Moving school leadership beyond its narrow boundaries: Developing a cross-cultural approach. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 67–204). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Walker, A., & Hallinger, P. (2007). Navigating culture and context: The principalship in East and Southeast Asia. In R. MacLean (Ed.), Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century: Papers in honor of Professor Phillip Hughes. Dordrecht: Springer.
Walker, A., & Qian, H. (2015). Review of research on school principal leadership in mainland China, 1998–2013: Continuity and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(4), 467–491.
Walker, A. D., Hu, R. K., & Qian, H. Y. (2012). Principal leadership in China: An initial review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 369–399.
Wang, T. (2016). School leadership and professional learning community: Case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36, 202–216.
Youngs, P., & King, M. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 643–670.
Zhang, J., & Pang, N. S.-K. (2016). Investigating the development of professional learning communities: Compare schools in Shanghai and Southwest China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36, 217–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, S., Hallinger, P. (2017). Leading Teacher Learning in China: A Mixed Methods Study of Successful School Leadership. In: Leithwood, K., Sun, J., Pollock, K. (eds) How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50979-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50980-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)