Advertisement

Identifying Context-Dependent Modes of Reading

  • Miho FuyamaEmail author
  • Shohei Hidaka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10091)

Abstract

Past literature has suggested that reading text as a whole cannot be reduced to merely an aggregation of sentence processing, but instead there are expected to be some context-dependent stylistic differences in the reading process. It has been, however, difficult to capture such context-dependent reading styles or modes. In this study, under the hypothesis that the statistics of reading time reflects such reading modes, we introduce a new statistical approach to capture them. Our analysis of the distributions of reading times identified two distinct modes of reading. In further analysis, we found that the temporal profiles of the two reading modes were correlated to the reader’s degree of engagement. We discuss how the context dependency of the reading modes is related to dynamic construction of the reader’s knowledge of narratives.

Keywords

Literary Reading Reading-time analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Neeraj Kashyap for his proofreading of this manuscript. The first author was supported by the Keio University Doctorate Student Grant-in-Aid Program and Mori Grants. The second author was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research B KAKENHI No. 23300099.

References

  1. 1.
    Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19(6), 716–723 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beaugrande, R.D.: The story of grammars and the grammar of stories. J. Pragmat. 6, 383–422 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. 39(1), 1–38 (1977)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gernsbacher, M.A.: Two decades of structure building. Discourse Process. 23(3), 265–304 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hidaka, S.: A computational model associating learning process, word attributes, and age of acquisition. PLOS ONE 8(10), e76242 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inhoff, A.W., Rayner, K.: Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency. Percept. Psychophys. 40(6), 431–439 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iser, W.: Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. Wilhelm Fink, München (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., Mullin, J.: Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cogn. Emot. 25(5), 818–833 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miall, D., Kuiken, D.: Beyond text theory: understanding literary response. Discourse Process. 17(3), 337–352 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miall, D.S.: Affect and narrative: a model of response to stories. Poetics 17, 259–272 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miall, D.S.: Beyond the schema given: affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cogn. Emot. 3(1), 55–78 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miall, D.S., Kuiken, D.: Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: response to literary stories. Poetics 22, 389–407 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6(2), 461–464 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thorndyke, P.W.: Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cogn. Psychol. 9(1), 77–110 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    White, S.J.: Eye movement control during reading: effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34(1), 205–223 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keio UniversityFujisawa-shiJapan
  2. 2.Japan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNomiJapan

Personalised recommendations