Skip to main content

Telling Jokes to Power: The (A)Political Work of Humour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 978 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Comedy ((PSCOM))

Abstract

Building on the previous theoretical discussion, this chapter challenges the celebratory accounts of humour as a form of liberatory political practice through formal analysis of several comic texts that directly address the political sphere: The Daily Show, The Thick of It, Veep, and The Onion. In doing so, I argue that the political valence attributed to the humour of these texts is misplaced and that the majority of the humour of these texts relies upon mockery of individual failings and the policing of middle-class social mores, rather than the subversion or critique of political institutions and processes, let alone structures of power. Consequently, I suggest that the political work of humour is frequently over-stated or misunderstood and that, even in texts that explicitly address questions of governance, the use of humour often remains clearly distinct from political questions and concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amarasingham, Amarnath (ed.). 2011. The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impact of Fake News. Jefferson: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Matthew. 2011. The Uses and Abuses of British Political Fiction or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Malcolm Tucker. Parliamentary Affairs 64 (2): 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Dominic, and Alexei Yurchak. 2010. American Stiob: Or, What Late-Socialist Aesthetics of Parody Reveal about Contemporary Political Culture in the West. Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 179–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Amber. 2009. And Now… the News? Mimesis and the Real in The Daily Show. In Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era, ed. Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones, and Ethan Thompson, 85–104. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Amber. 2011. Satire and Dissent. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettings, Michael. 2007. The Fake, the False and the Fictional: The Daily Show as News Source. In The Daily Show and Philosophy, ed. Jason Holt, 16–27. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Jeremy. 2008. Anticapitalism and Culture: Radical Theory and Popular Politics. Oxford: Berg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Jeffrey P., Geoffrey Baym, and Amber Day. 2012. Mr. Stewart and Mr. Colbert go to Washington: Television Satirists Outside the Box. Social Research 79 (1): 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Paul. 2006. Cracking Up: American Humor in a Time of Conflict. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Paul. 2011. What’s so Funny About a Dead Terrorist? Towards an Ethics of Humor for the Digital Age. In A Decade of Dark Humor, ed. Ted Gournelos, and Viveca Greene, 214–232. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, Chuck. 2011. Fareed Zakaria, The Daily Show. June 7, New York: Comedy Central.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Michael L., and Lorraine York. 2007. ‘First, They’re Foreigners’: The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and the Limits of Dissident Laughter. Canadian Review of American Studies 37 (3): 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Charles E. 1977. Political Humor: From Aristophanes to Sam Ervin. Cranbury: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapeero, Tristram. 2012. Nicknames. Veep. Washington, D.C.: HBO Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Scott. 2012. Sexiest Man Alive Gets ‘The Onion’ Taken Seriously. Simon Says. NPR.com, Dec 1. Accessed 21 July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, David. 2012. The Thick Of It: ‘Series 2—Episode 2’/‘Series 2—Episode 3’. TV Club. The Onion A.V. Club, July 21. Accessed 2 February 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisanen, Don J. 2011. Crafting Hyperreal Spaces for Comic Insights: The Onion News Network’s Ironic Iconicity. Communication Quarterly 59 (5): 508–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waisanen, Don J., and Amy B. Becker. 2015. The Problem with Being Joe Biden: Political Comedy and Circulating Personae. Critical Studies in Media Communication 32 (4): 256–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Jamie. 2008. Tyranny of the Dichotomy: Prophetic Dualism, Irony, and The Onion. The Electronic Journal of Communication 18 (2–4): n.pag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupančič, Alenka. 2008. The Odd One In: On Comedy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Holm .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holm, N. (2017). Telling Jokes to Power: The (A)Political Work of Humour. In: Humour as Politics. Palgrave Studies in Comedy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50950-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics