Abstract
Human beings are wired to believe. These beliefs – including moral, legal, political, and religious beliefs – are extremely important because they can define a person’s character and influence decision-making processes. Recent neuroimaging and lesion studies have shown that these beliefs have neural underpinnings in the human brain. This chapter reviews the current research on the human social belief system and its neural correlates. There is no evidence of dedicated brain systems uniquely devoted to a specific kind of human social belief. The studies reviewed in this chapter highlight a core set of regions within the prefrontal cortex, in association with the anterior temporal lobe, reward circuit, and limbic regions, that appear to critically mediate a variety of social belief systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baumeister RF, Masicampo EJ, Dewall CN (2009) Prosocial benefits of feeling free: disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 35(2):260–268. doi:10.1177/0146167208327217
Boyer P (2008) Being human: religion: bound to believe? Nature 455(7216):1038–1039. doi:10.1038/4551038a
Casebeer WD (2003) Moral cognition and its neural constituents. Nat Rev Neurosci 4(10):840–846. doi:10.1038/nrn1223
Cristofori I, Viola V, Chau A, Zhong W, Krueger F, Zamboni G, Grafman J (2015) The neural bases for devaluing radical political statements revealed by penetrating traumatic brain injury. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu155
Cunningham WA, Raye CL, Johnson MK (2004) Implicit and explicit evaluation: FMRI correlates of valence, emotional intensity, and control in the processing of attitudes. J Cogn Neurosci 16(10):1717–1729. doi:10.1162/0898929042947919
Glass L, Moody L, Grafman J, Krueger F (2015) Neural signatures of third-party punishment: evidence from penetrating traumatic brain injury. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. doi:10.1093/scan/nsv105
Gozzi M, Zamboni G, Krueger F, Grafman J (2010) Interest in politics modulates neural activity in the amygdala and ventral striatum. Hum Brain Mapp 31(11):1763–1771. doi:10.1002/hbm.20976
Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1464–1480
Just MA, Newman SD, Keller TA, McEleney A, Carpenter PA (2004) Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 21(1):112–124
Kapogiannis D, Barbey AK, Su M, Zamboni G, Krueger F, Grafman J (2009) Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(12):4876–4881. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811717106
Knutson KM et al (2006) Politics on the brain: an FMRI investigation. Soc Neurosci 1(1):25–40
Knutson KM, Krueger F, Koenigs M, Hawley A, Escobedo JR, Vasudeva V, Adolphs R, Grafman J (2010) Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 5(4):378–384. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq005
Koenigs M et al (2007) Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446(7138):908–911
Krueger F, Parasuraman R, Moody L, Twieg P, de Visser E, McCabe K, O’Hara M, Lee MR (2013) Oxytocin selectively increases perceptions of harm for victims but not the desire to punish offenders of criminal offenses. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8(5):494–498. doi:10.1093/scan/nss026
Krueger F, Hoffman M, Walter H, Grafman J (2014) An fMRI investigation of the effects of belief in free will on third-party punishment. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9(8):1143–1149. doi:10.1093/scan/nst092
Liu W, Miller BL, Kramer JH, Rankin K, Wyss-Coray C, Gearhart R, Phengrasamy L, Weiner M, Rosen HJ (2004) Behavioral disorders in the frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 62(5):742–748
Mah L, Arnold MC, Grafman J (2004) Lesions of prefrontal cortex impair social perception. Am J Psychiatry 161:1247–1255
Mah L, Arnold MC, Grafman J (2005) Deficits in social knowledge following lesions of ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 17:66–74
Mitchell JP, Macrae CN, Banaji MR (2006) Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50(4):655–663. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.040
Moll J, Zahn R, de Oliveira-Souza R, Krueger F, Grafman J (2005) Opinion: the neural basis of human moral cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(10):799–809. doi:10.1038/nrn1768
Moll J, Zahn R, de Oliveira-Souza R, Bramati IE, Krueger F, Tura B, Cavanagh AL, Grafman J (2011) Impairment of prosocial sentiments is associated with frontopolar and septal damage in frontotemporal dementia. NeuroImage 54(2):1735–1742. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.026
Moretto G et al (2010) A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage. J Cogn Neurosci 22(8):1888–1899
Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M, Boone K, Miller BL, Cummings J, Benson DF (1998) Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 51(6):1546–1554
Paulhus DL, Carey JM (2011) The FAD-Plus: measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs. J Pers Assess 94:96–104
Robertson D, Snarey J, Ousley O, Harenski K, DuBois BF, Gilkey R, Kilts C (2007a) The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia 45:755–766
Robertson D et al (2007b) The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia 45(4):755–766
Robinson P, Kurzban R (2007) Concordance and conflict in intuitions of justice. Minnesota Law Rev 91:1829–1893
Rosen HJ, Allison SC, Schauer GF, Gorno-Tempini ML, Weiner MW, Miller BL (2005) Neuroanatomical correlates of behavioural disorders in dementia. Brain J Neurol 128(Pt 11):2612–2625. doi:10.1093/brain/awh628
Siegal M, Varley R (2002) Neural systems involved in “theory of mind”. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(6):463–471. doi:10.1038/nrn844
Snowden JS, Bathgate D, Varma A, Blackshaw A, Gibbons ZC, Neary D (2001) Distinct behavioural profiles in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70(3):323–332
Takahashi H, Yahata N, Koeda M, Matsuda T, Asai K, Okubo Y (2004) Brain activation associated with evaluative processes of guilt and embarrassment: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 23(3):967–974. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.054
Vohs KD, Schooler JW (2008) The value of believing in free will: encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychol Sci 19(1):49–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x
Zamboni G, Gozzi M, Krueger F, Duhamel JR, Sirigu A, Grafman J (2009) Individualism, conservatism, and radicalism as criteria for processing political beliefs: a parametric fMRI study. Soc Neurosci 4(5):367–383. doi:10.1080/17470910902860308
Zeelenberg M, Breugelmans SM (2008) The role of interpersonal harm in distinguishing regret from guilt. Emotion 8(5):589–596. doi:10.1037/a0012894
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cristofori, I., Grafman, J. (2017). Neural Underpinnings of the Human Belief System. In: Angel, HF., Oviedo, L., Paloutzian, R., Runehov, A., Seitz, R. (eds) Processes of Believing: The Acquisition, Maintenance, and Change in Creditions. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50922-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50924-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)