Skip to main content

Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Mexico

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 23))

Abstract

The application of the New York Convention in Mexico has been generally positive. It is generally made not directly but through interpretation and application of the Commercial Code provisions that implemented the Convention. The biggest difficulty that the application of the Convention entails in Mexico has to do with the lack of full and accurate understanding of its content on the part of courts and litigators. In any event, case law interpreting the Convention’s provisions is very scarce in Mexico.

Claus von Wobeser is the managing partner of Von Wobeser y Sierra with almost 40 years of experience in advising both multinational Fortune 500 clients as well as governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 269.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mexican Constitution [CPEUM], article 133, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] February 5, 1917, latest reforms DOF July 10, 2015 (Mexico). See also E Arteaga Nava, Constitutional Law, 2nd edition (Oxford University Press, Mexico, 1999) 23.

  2. 2.

    L Ortiz Ahlf, Derecho Internacional Publico, 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, Mexico, 2004) 35-36.

  3. 3.

    V Bañuelos Rizo, Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, 1st edition (Mexico, Limusa, Colección Mediación-Arbitraje, 2010) 43-77.

  4. 4.

    Commerce Code, article 1448, DOF December 13, 1889, latest reforms, DOF June 13, 2014.

  5. 5.

    Commerce Code, article 1416, DOF December 13, 1889, latest reforms, DOF June 13, 2014.

  6. 6.

    Commerce Code, article 1425, DOF December 13, 2014.

  7. 7.

    V Bañuelos Rizo, Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, 1st edition (Mexico, Limusa, Colección Mediación-Arbitraje, 2010) 417-421.

  8. 8.

    V Bañuelos Rizo, Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, 1st edition (Mexico, Limusa, Colección Mediación-Arbitraje, 2010) 421.

  9. 9.

    Mexican Constitution [CPEUM], article 104, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] February 5, 1917, latest reforms DOF July 10, 2015 (Mexico).

  10. 10.

    Relativity of Amparo Decisions, Primer Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Tercer Circuito [TCC], Semanario Judicial de la Federación, Octava Época, Tomo III, Segunda Parte-2, January-June 1989, decision no. 229155, 779 (Mexico).

  11. 11.

    Amparo Law, articles 215-231, DOF April 2, 2013, latest reforms, DOF July 14, 2014.

  12. 12.

    Amparo Law, article 218, April 2, 2013, latest reforms, DOF July 14, 2014.

  13. 13.

    Federal Civil Code [CC], articles 2224-2242, DOF August 31, 1928, latest reforms, DOF December 24, 2013.

  14. 14.

    Commercial Arbitration. Criteria for Determining the Inefficacy of an Arbitral Agreement, Tercer Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Primer Circuito [TCC] Semanario Judicial de la Federación, Novena Época, Tomo XXII, December 2005, Decision no. I.3o.C.521 C, 2623 (Mexico).

  15. 15.

    Commercial Arbitration. The Insolvency of One of the Parties to the Arbitration That Makes Impossible the Payment of the Arbitrators’ Fees Is Not Ground for Inefficacy of the Agreement, Tercer Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Primer Circuito [TCC], Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta, Novena Época, Tomo XXII, December 2005, Decision no. I.3o.C.522 C, 2625 (Mexico).

  16. 16.

    Federal Civil Code [CC], articles 13-15, DOF August 31, 1928, latest reforms, DOF December 24, 2013.

  17. 17.

    Commercial Arbitration. Jurisdiction to Entertain an Action to Set Aside the Arbitral Agreement Regulated under Article 1424 of the Commerce Code is for the Judge and not for the Arbitral Tribunal, Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Primera Sala, [SCJN], Source: Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta, Novena Época, Tomo XXIV, September 2006, Decision no. 1a./J. 25/2006, 5 (Mexico).

  18. 18.

    F González de Cossío, Arbitraje, 3rd edition (Porrúa, Mexico, 2011) 824.

  19. 19.

    Federal Civil Code [CC], articles 13-15, DOF August 31, 1928, latest reforms, DOF December 24, 2013.

  20. 20.

    Partial Nullity of the Arbitral Award. The Party Opposing the Appeal Has Standing to Challenge the Decision which Dismisses Other Arguments Raised by the Court, Tercer Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Primer Circuito [TCC], Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta, Novena Época, Tomo XXXIII, May 2011, Decision no. I.3o.C.956 C, 1233 (Mexico).

  21. 21.

    Commercial Arbitration. The Arbitral Agreement and the Characteristics of the Arbitral Award Rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal When it is Authorized to Decide as Amiable Composituer (Interpretation of Articles 1416.I, 1423, 1435, 1436, 1437, 1445 and 1448 of the Commerce Code), Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, Primera Sala, [SCJN], Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta, Novena Época, Tomo XXX, September 2009, Decision no. 1a. CLXXI/2009, 426 (Mexico).

  22. 22.

    Mexican Constitution [CPEUM], article 28, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] February 5, 1917, latest reforms DOF July 10, 2015 (Mexico).

  23. 23.

    Civil Procedure Code for the Federal District [CPCDF], article 615, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] May 26, 1928, latest reforms Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal June 2, 2015 (Mexico).

  24. 24.

    Mexican Constitution [CPEUM], article 102, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] February 5, 1917, latest reforms DOF July 10, 2015 (Mexico).

  25. 25.

    Mexican Constitution [CPEUM], article 123, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] February 5, 1917, latest reforms DOF July 10, 2015 (Mexico).

  26. 26.

    Mexican Constitution [CPEUM], article 27, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] February 5, 1917, latest reforms DOF July 10, 2015 (Mexico).

  27. 27.

    Public Policy. It is an Undetermined Legal Concept Which is Updated For Every Particular Case, According to the Minimum Rules of Social Coexistence, Cuarto Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Administrativa del Primer Circuito [TCC], Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta, Novena Época, Tomo XXII, August 2005, 1956 (Mexico).

  28. 28.

    Public Policy. Pro Arbitration Principle and Recognition of the Party’s Autonomy to Decide on the Annulment of an Arbitral Award (Interpretation of Article V.2.B of the New York Convention), Tercer Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Primer Circuito [TCC], Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta, Novena Época, Tomo XXXIII, May 2011, Decision no. I.3o.C.953 C, 1241 (Mexico).

  29. 29.

    Civil Procedure Code for the Federal District [CPCDF], article 156, Diario Oficial de la Federación [DOF] May 256, 1928, latest reforms Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal June 2, 2015 (Mexico).

  30. 30.

    Federal Civil Code [CC], article 1159, DOF August 31, 1928, latest reforms, DOF December 24, 2013.

  31. 31.

    Commerce Code, articles 1090-1131, DOF December 13, 1889, latest reforms, DOF June 13, 2014.

REFERENCES

  • V Bañuelos Rizo, Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, 1st edition (Mexico, Limusa, Colección Mediación-Arbitraje, Arbitraje

    Google Scholar 

  • L Ortiz Ahlf, Derecho Internacional Publico, 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, Mexico, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • V Bañuelos Rizo, Arbitraje Comercial Internacional, 1st edition (Mexico, Limusa, Colección Mediación-Arbitraje, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • F González de Cossío, ArbitrationArbitraje (Mexico, Porrúa, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • S Gómez Ruano, E González de Castilla, F González de Cossío, L E Graham, C Loperena Ruiz and R Zamora Etcharren Manual de Arbitraje Comercial (Mexico, Porrúa, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • L Ortiz Ahlf, Derecho Internacional Publico, 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, Mexico, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Mexicano del Arbitraje (ed), Legislación Mexicana de Arbitraje Comercial (Mexico, Porrúa, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claus von Wobeser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Wobeser, C. (2017). Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Mexico. In: Bermann, G. (eds) Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50915-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50915-0_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50913-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50915-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics