Dominance, Deference, and Hierarchy Formation in Wikipedia Edit-Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 693)

Abstract

Does co-editing of Wikipedia articles reveal users dominating others? Do these dyadic dominance orderings (if any) lead to a global linear hierarchy among contributing users? In this article we claim that dominance (respectively deference) is revealed by users undoing (respectively redoing) edits of others. We propose methods to turn the history of Wikipedia pages into a dynamic multiplex network resulting from three types of interaction events: dyadic dominance, dyadic deference, and third-party assigned dominance ties. We analyze various local temporal patterns for the different types of ties on a sample of page histories comprising 12,719 revisions by 7,657 unique users. On the dyad level we analyze whether two users tend to agree on a dominance order among them or whether dominated users tend to fight back. On the neighborhood level we analyze various degree effects including whether dominant users tend to dominate in the future and whether subordinate users tend to get dominated. On the triad level we analyze whether users have a preference for transitive closure over cyclic closure of dominance ties. These dynamic patterns shed light on the micro processes that can foster or impede the emergence of a global linear hierarchy.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adler, B.T., de Alfaro, L.: A content-driven reputation system for the Wikipedia. In: Proc. 16th Intl. Conf. WWW, pp. 261–270 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyce, W.T., Obradovi´c, J., Bush, N.R., Stamperdahl, J., Kim, Y.S., Adler, N.: Social stratification, classroom climate, and the behavioral adaptation of kindergarten children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(Supplement 2), 17168–17173 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brandes, U., Kenis, P., Lerner, J., van Raaij, D.: Network analysis of collaboration structure in Wikipedia. In: Proc. 18th Intl. Conf. WWW (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butts, C.T.: A relational event framework for social action. Sociological Methodology 38(1), 155–200 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chase, I.D.: Dynamics of hierarchy formation: the sequential development of dominance relationships. Behaviour 80(3), 218–239 (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fişek, M.H., Berger, J., Norman, R.Z.: Participation in heterogeneous and homogeneous groups: A theoretical integration. American Journal of Sociology pp. 114–142 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iba, T., Nemoto, K., Peters, B., Gloor, P.A.: Analyzing the creative editing behavior of Wikipedia editors: Through dynamic social network analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2(4), 6441–6456 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Javanmardi, S., Lopes, C., Baldi, P.: Modeling user reputation in wikis. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 3(2), 126–139 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keegan, B.C., Lev, S., Arazy, O.: Analyzing organizational routines in online knowledge collaborations: A case for sequence analysis in CSCW. In: Proc. 19th ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1065–1079. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lerner, J.: Structural balance in signed networks: Separating the probability to interact from the tendency to fight. Social Networks 45, 66–77 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Signed networks in social media. In: Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1361–1370. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leuf, B., Cunningham, W.: The Wiki Way. Addison-Wesley (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maniu, S., Cautis, B., Abdessalem, T.: Building a signed network from interactions in Wikipedia. In: Proc. Databases and Social Networks, pp. 19–24. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mones, E., Vicsek, L., Vicsek, T.: Hierarchy measure for complex networks. PloS one 7(3), e33799 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schjelderup-Ebbe, T.: Beitr¨age zur Sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns. Zeitschrift f¨ur Psychologie 88, 225–252 (1922)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shizuka, D., McDonald, D.B.: A social network perspective on measurements of dominance hierarchies. Animal Behaviour 83(4), 925–934 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shizuka, D., McDonald, D.B.: The network motif architecture of dominance hierarchies. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 12, 20150080 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Willer, R.: Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review 74(1), 23–43 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
  2. 2.Università della Svizzera italianaLuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations