Skip to main content

The Language of Lawmaking and Its Effects: Mutual Constitution of Discourse and Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Counter-terrorism and the Prospects of Human Rights
  • 591 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 3 offers a novel approach to studying the nexus of counter-terrorism and human rights, with a research design congruent to the theoretical premises. The chapter elucidates the oft-overlooked yet indispensable relation between language and concrete policies, clarifying how frame analysis of parliamentary debates can supplement a comparative policy analysis. To this end, the book is premised on the triangulation of relevant policies and the discourses they are embedded in. A systematic structure of policy frame, the coding process and how the qualitative research program ATLAS.ti is utilized has been explicated in detail. This methodology is employed in carefully chosen two cases, namely the UK and Turkey, with shared experiences of terrorism and similarities in counter-terrorism legislation, yet different political contexts.

If counter-terrorism rhetoric were a currency, it would have by now lost all its value through inflation.

(Gearty, 2007: 14)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the terms text and discourse are used in various ways by different analysts, generally the former is taken to connote internal characteristics and structures of a linguistic material; whereas, the latter conveys a more inclusive meaning, one that takes into account the context that a text is produced (Alba-Juez, 2009: 8–11).

  2. 2.

    It must also be noted that while a prevalent discourse is one form of representation, it necessarily suggests that an alternative representation has been revoked or silenced. This silencing is as significant as the words uttered in analyzing the structure and content of a given text (Johnstone, 2002: 11). As lucidly explicated by Johnstone, “…what is not said or be said is the background without which what is said could not be heard” (2002: 58).

  3. 3.

    Since 2015 Turkey has been subject to a great number of terrorist attacks with the escalation of the Syrian civil war and the growing threat posed by what has come to be known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), as well as the end of cease fire with the PKK. Although this book focuses on the period between 2001 until 2015, it must be noted that these grave events have weighed a heavy toll on the Turkish society.

Bibliography

  • Agamben, Giorgio (2003) State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba-Juez, Laura (2009) Perspectives on Discourse Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzacq, Thierry (2010) “A Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions and Variants,” in Thierry Balzacq (ed.), Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, M. M. (2011) “Mixed-method,” in Bertrand Badie et al. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science, pp. 1586–1590, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992) Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods (2nd ed.) Allyn and Bacon: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre (2006) “Language and Symbolic Power,” in Adam Jaworski & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), The Discourse Reader, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, & De Wilde, Jaap (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, Arjun (2011) “The Giver or the Recipient?: The Peculiar Ownership of Human Rights”, in International Political Sociology, vol. 5, pp. 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Julie W., & John, Hassard (2010) “Triangulation,” in Albert J. Mills et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman, & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Tim (2010) “The English School,” in Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, & Steve Smith (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejdus, Filip (2009) “Dangerous Liaisons: Securitization Theory and Schmittian Legacy,” in Western Balkans Security Observer: Journal of the Belgrade School of Security Studies, Belgrade School of Security Studies: Center for the Civil-Military Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Tony (2005) “International Human Rights Law as Power/Knowledge,” in Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 1046–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, James Paul (1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving (1986) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, Ben, & Williams, George (2006) “Balancing National Security and Human Rights: Assessing the Legal Response of Common Law Nations to the Threat of Terrorism,” in Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, vol. 8 no. 1, pp. 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Regina et al. (2012) “The ‘Dark’ Side of Normative Argumentation-The Case of Counter-terrorism Policy,” in Global Constitutionalism, vol. 1 no. 2, pp. 278–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard (2009) “Knowledge, Power and Politics in the Study of Political Terrorism,” in Richard Jackson et al. (eds.), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Adam, & Coupland, Nikolas (2006) The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, Barbara (2002) Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konecki, Krzysztof T (2008) “Triangulation and Dealing with the Realness of Qualitative Research,” in Qualitative Sociology Review, vol. 4 no. 3, pp. 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, Jim A. (2009) “Framing Analysis,” in J. A. Kuypers (ed.), Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizides, Neophytos G. (2009) “Elite Framing and Conflict Transformation in Turkey,” in Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 62 no. 2, pp. 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müftüler-Bac, Meltem (2005) “Turkey’s Political Reforms: The Impact of the European Union,” in South East European Politics and Societies, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Andrew W. (2010) Exceptionalism and the Politics of Counter-terrorism: Liberty, Security, and the War on Terror. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, Andrew W. (2012) “Normalization and Legislative Exceptionalism: Counterterrorist Lawmaking and the Changing Times of Security Emergencies,” in International Political Sociology, vol. 6, pp. 260–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisoiu, Daniela (2013) “Pragmatic Persuasion in Counter-terrorism,” in Critical Terrorism Studies, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, Garry, & Lopez, Garry (2001) After Postmodernism. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, Martin., Schön, Donald.(2002) “Reframing Policy Discourse,” in Frank Fischer and John Forester (eds.), Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, Christian (2001) “Human Rights and the Social Construction of Sovereignty,” in Review of International Studies, vol. 27, pp. 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbauer, Paulette M. (2008) “Triangulation,” in Lisa M. Given (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. [1932] (1996) The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, David, & Marvasti, Amir (2008) Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986) “Frame Alignment Process, Micromobilization and Movement Participation,” in American Sociological Review, vol. 51 no. 4, pp. 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, Laura (2011) “Triangulation,” in B. Bertrand et al. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science, pp. 2670–2672, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm, & Corbin, Juliet (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, Rebecca (1999) The Policy Process: An Overview. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toros, Harmonie, Gunning, Jeroen (2009) “Exploring a Critical theory Approach to Terrorism Studies,” in Richard Jackson et al. (eds.), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukala, Anastassia (2008) “Defining the Terrorist Threat in the Post-September 11 era,” in Bigo, Didier & Tsoukala, Anastassia (eds.), Terror, Insecurity, and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regime After 9/11, New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, Teun (2001) “Critical Discourse Analysis,” in Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, Mieke, Lombardo, Emanuela (2007) “Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach,” in Mieke Verloo (ed.), Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, Budapest: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael C. (2003) “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics,” in International Studies Quarterly, vol. 47, pp. 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth (2008) “Introduction: Discourse Studies- Important Concepts and Terms,” in Ruth Wodak & Michal Krzyzanowski (eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth (2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zarakol, Ayşe (2011) “What Makes Terrorism Modern? Terrorism, Legitimacy, and the International System,” in Review of International Studies, vol. 37 no. 05, pp. 2311–2336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hürriyet (2014) “Davutoğlu AİHM’nin Kıbrıs Kararı Hakkında Konuştu,” 13 May 2014. [Retrieved 30 May 2014] Available at http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/26409234.asp.

  • Mendoza, Martha (2011) “Global Terrorism: 35,000 Worldwide Convicted For Terror Offenses Since September 11 Attacks,” in The Huffington Post. 09 March. [Retrieved 10 April 2012] Available at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/03/terrorism-convictions-since-sept-11_n_947865.html.

  • Travis, Alan (2013) “Conservatives Promise to Scrap Human Rights Act After Next Election,” in The Guardian. 30 September. [Retrieved 20 April 2014] Available at http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/sep/30/conservitives-scrap-human-rights-act.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demirsu, I. (2017). The Language of Lawmaking and Its Effects: Mutual Constitution of Discourse and Policy. In: Counter-terrorism and the Prospects of Human Rights . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50802-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics