Skip to main content

The Coercive Diplomacy of Vladimir Putin (2014–2016)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Russian Challenge to the European Security Environment

Abstract

Chapter 6, ‘The Coercive Diplomacy of Vladimir Putin (2014–2016)’, by Stanislav Tkachenko, examines the increasing willingness of the Russian regime under President Vladimir Putin to employ the threat and the use of limited military pressure to accomplish its political goals. In many respects Tkachenko examines the other side of the relationship on which Lomagin has focused – the strengths that Russia, as the weaker side in the competition, has drawn upon to pursue its interests, including re-establishing a multipolar international system. Tkachenko is especially interested in demonstrating that increasingly Russia has not merely been reactive to Western challenges. The coercive diplomacy of Russia’s leaders represents a new thrust of Russia’s policy, driven by the willingness to protect its vital interests in the former Soviet republics and benefit from equal relations with the USA and major European powers. Yet, coercive diplomacy, in his view signifies Russia’s weakness in the contest with the West.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In an address to participants of the Riga Conference on November 7, 2015, at the plenary session titled ‘Quo Vadis twenty-first century Russia’, Dr Celeste A. Wallander, Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director, Russia and Central Asia at the US National Security Council, in 10-minutes speech five times mentioned ‘Russian coercion’ and three times ‘Russian aggression’ (‘Looking Back’ 2015).

References

  • Allen, Susan H. (2011) ‘Bombing to Bargain? The Air War for Kosovo’, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Art, Robert J., & Cronin, P. M. (2003) The United States and Coercive Diplomacy. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, David (1985) Economic Statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhadrakumar, M. K. (2015) ‘Russia’s Game Plan: Compel Obama to Meet with Putin’, The Asian Times, September 16. Permanent address of the article. http://atimes.com/2015/09/russias-game-plan-compel-obama-to-meet-with-putin/. (accessed August 7, 2016).

  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, & Lalman, David (1992) War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, & Randolph, M. Siverson (1995) ‘War and the Survival of Political Leader: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability’, American Political Science Review, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 841–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashti-Gibson, Jaleh, Davis, Patricia, & Radcliff, Benjamin (1997) ‘On the Determination of the Success of Economic Sanctions: An Empirical Analysis’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Graeme A.M. (2012) ‘Coercive Diplomacy Meets Diversionary Incentives: The Impact of US and Iranian Domestic Politics during the Bush and Obama Presidencies’, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander L. (1991) Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War. Washington, D.C.: US Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Henry E. (2016) ‘25 Years After the USSR: What’s Gone Wrong?’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbaum, Eric (2002) The Age of Extremes. The Short Twentieth Century: 1914–1991. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, Gary, & Scott, Jeffrey (1983) Economic Sanctions in Support of Foreign Policy Goals. WashLatvia Trington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, Gary C., Schott, Jeffrey J., & Elliott, K. A. (2000) Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy. 2nd ed. vol. 1. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaganov, Sergey, Bordachev, TImofey, & Suslov, Dmitry (2009) ‘Russia and the U.S.: Reconfiguration, Not Resetting’, Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegley, Charles W., Raymond, Jr., Gregory A., & Hermann, Margaret G. (1998) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Nonintervention Norm: Some Correlates and Potential Consequences’, The Fletcher Forum, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, Jonathan (1997) ‘The Microfoundations of Economic Sanctions’, Security Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauthammer, Charles (2015) ‘Obama’s Syria Debacle’, The Washington Post, October 1, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Looking Back’ (2015) ‘Looking Back at the Riga Conference 2015 “Quo Vadis Russia?”’, Latvian Transatlantic Organisation, November. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrB2Pn996G0

  • Pape, Robert (1996) Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Condoleezza, & Gates, Robert M. (2015) ‘How America can Counter Putin’s Moves in Syria’, The Washington Post, October, vol. 8, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, Melvin, & David Singer, J. (1976) ‘The War Proneness of Democratic Regimes’, Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Alistair (1996) ‘Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, Dmitry (2015) From Greater Europe to Greater Asia? The Sino-Russian Entente. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. http://carnegie.ru/publications/?fa=59728. (accessed August 5, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, A. (2014) Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavskaya, Natalia (2011) ‘The EU and Russia’, in J.-U. Wunderlich & D. J. Bailey, eds., The European Union and Global Governance: A Handbook. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 274–284.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislav L. Tkachenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tkachenko, S.L. (2017). The Coercive Diplomacy of Vladimir Putin (2014–2016). In: Kanet, R. (eds) The Russian Challenge to the European Security Environment . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50775-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics