Advertisement

Crowd-Driven IoT/IoE Ecosystems: A Multidimensional Approach

  • Xenia ZiouvelouEmail author
  • Panagiotis Alexandrou
  • Constantinos Marios Angelopoulos
  • Orestis Evangelatos
  • Joao Fernandes
  • Nikos Loumis
  • Frank McGroarty
  • Sotiris Nikoletseas
  • Aleksandra Rankov
  • Theofanis Raptis
  • Anna Ståhlbröst
  • Sebastien Ziegler
Chapter
Part of the Internet of Things book series (ITTCC)

Abstract

During the past few years an astonishing paradigm shift has occurred towards a new participatory value creation model driven by users. Open collaborative innovation practices have emerged in which an increasing number of users mutually collaborate by openly communicating their ideas, sharing best practices, and creating new knowledge across sectors. These online, distributed, crowd-driven networks take advantage of underlying network effects in order to harness the collective power and intelligence of the Crowd. Such novel paradigms fuel an increasing interest in mobile crowdsensing (MCS) methods in the context of IoT/IoE, which leverage the power and the wisdom of the crowd to observe, measure, and make sense of particular phenomena by exploiting user-owned mobile and wearable devices. However, when one examines the design and development of such ecosystems, realises that there is a gap in existing research. While emphasis has been placed upon the technical aspects, the success of such ecosystems is dependent on a number of diverse criteria. This chapter aims to fill this gap by providing a framework, which adopts a holistic approach based on multiple perspectives (namely technical, business, and people perspectives) and facilitates the design and development of crowd-driven ecosystems. This model is examined in the context of a hybrid crowd-driven IoT/IoE ecosystem, IoT Lab, in order to exemplify how these perspectives can be used to promote an ecosystem’s success and detail the challenges faced. This analysis is extended through the introduction of the “Crowd-driven Ecosystem Index (CEI)”, which measures the coverage intensity of each of the key ecosystem parameters, denoting this way the propensity of success of a crowd-driven network.

Keywords

Wearable Device Business Perspective Innovation Ecosystem Business Ecosystem Personal Data Protection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The research reported in this paper has been supported by the EU/FIRE IoT Lab project—STREP ICT-610477.

References

  1. 1.
    IEEE-IoT 2015. Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). Revision No. 1–Published 27 May 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Bradley, J. Barbier, and D. Handler D. Embracing the Internet of Everything to capture your share of $14.4 trillion: More Relevant, Valuable Connections Will Improve Innovation, Productivity, Efficiency & Customer Experience. White Paper Cisco, 2013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.A. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, A. Parker, N. Ramanathan, S. Reddy; et al., Participatory sensing. Center for Embedded Network Sensing. 2006. UCLA: Center for Embedded Network Sensing.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. K. Ganti, Y. Fan and L. Hui, Mobile Crowdsensing: Current State and Future Challenges, IEEE Commun. Mag., 49(11), 2011, pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.G. Tansley. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16, 1935, pp. 284–307.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Resources Institute (WRI). World Resources 2000–2001: People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life. Report Series by United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, World Bank and World Resources Institute - September 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.A. Frosch, and N.E. Gallopoulos, Strategies for Manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), 1989, pp. 144–152.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.F. Moore, Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review. 71(3), 1993, pp. 75–83.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. F. Moore, The Death of Competition: Leadership & Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. 1996, New York, Harper Business.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.W. Chesbrough and M.M. Appleyard, Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 2007, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Almeida and B. Kogut, Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45, 1999, pp. 905–917.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Baptista, Clusters, innovation and growth: a survey of the literature. In: G. M. P. Swann, M. Prevezer and D. Stout, eds. The dynamics of industrial clusters: international comparisons in computing and biotechnology, 1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press 13–51.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Bray, Knowledge Ecosystems. In Organizational dynamics of technology-based innovation: Diversifying the research agenda, 2007 (pp. 457–462). Springer US.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Coughlan, Enhancing Innovation through Virtual Proximity. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(2), 2014, pp. 17–22.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Clarysse, M. Wright, J. Bruneel, and A. Mahajan, Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 2014, pp. 1164–1176.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Koening, Business Ecosystems Revisited. Management, 15(2), 2012, pp. 208–224.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Valkokari, Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 2015, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Iansiti and R. Levien, The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.B. Andersen, What Are Innovation Ecosystems and How To Build and Use Them. Innovation Management, 2011.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Wright, Academic entrepreneurship technology transfer and society: Where next? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 2013, pp. 322–34.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E.G. Carayannis, Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, 2010.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S.M. Lee, D.L. Olson and S. Trimi, Co-Innovation: Convergenomics, Collaboration, and Co-Creation for Organizational Values. Management Decision, 50(5), 2012, pp. 817–831.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Tapscott and A.D. Williams. Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. 2008, Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, Creating Shared Value, Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 2011, (January–February).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.K. Rana, C.T. Chou, S.S. Kanhere, N. Bulusu, and W. Hu, Ear-Phone an End-to-End Participatory Urban Noise Mapping System. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Stockholm, Sweden, 12–16 April 2010, pp. 105–116.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Thepvilojanapong, T. Ono, and Y.A. Tobe, Deployment of Fine-Grained Sensor Network and Empirical Analysis of Urban Temperature. Sensors, 10, 2010, pp. 2217–2241. 
Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ludwig, T., Siebigteroth, T., and Pipek, V., 2014. CrowdMonitor: Monitoring Physical and Digital Activities of Citizens During Emergencies. Social Informatics, 8852, pp. 421–428.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bélanger, F. and Crossler, R. E. 2011. Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1017–1041.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hong, W. and Thong, J. Y. L. 2013. Internet Privacy Concerns: An Integrated Conceptualization and Four Empirical Studies. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), pp. 275–298.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Muhdi, L. and Boutellier, R. 2011. Motivational Factors Affecting Participation and Contribution of Members in Two Different Swiss Innovation Communities. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(3). pp. 543–562.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brabham, D. C. 2010. Moving the Crowd at Threadless. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), pp. 1122–1145.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T. and Veit, D. 2011. More Than Fun and Money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing – a Study on Mechanical Turk. AMCIS2011.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nov, O., 2007. What Motivates Wikipedians. Communication of the ACM, 50(11) pp. 60–64.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ståhlbröst, A., Angelopoulos, C. M., Evangelatos, O., Krco, S., Nikoletseas, S., Raptis, T. and Ziegler, S., 2015. Understanding Modes of Crowdsourcing and Related Crowd Motivators. XXVI ISPIM conference, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    IoT Lab project. Available at (access: 20.01.2016): www.iotlab.eu.
  36. 36.
    Greenough, J., 2014, How the Internet of Things market will grow, Business Insider. Available at (access: 25.01.2016): http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-the-internet-of-things-market-will-grow-2014-10?r=US&IR=T.
  37. 37.
    Dave Evans, The Internet of Everything – Cisco. Available at (access: 25.01.2016): https://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoE.pdf.
  38. 38.
    Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K. and Frow, P., 2008. Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), pp. 83–96.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Prahalad, C. K. and Ramaswamy, V., 2004. Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & leadership, 32(3), pp. 4–9.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chesbrough, H., 2007. Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy & leadership, 35(6), pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Christin, D., Reinhardt, A., Kanhere, S. and Hollick, M. 2011. A Survey on Privacy in Mobile Participatory Sensing Applications. The journal of systems and software, 84. pp. 1928–1946.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huang, K. L., Kanhere, S. S. and Hu, W. 2010. Preserving Privacy in Participatory Sensing Systems. Computer Communications, 33(11). pp. 1266–1280.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weber, R. H., 2010. Internet of Things – New Security and Privacy Challenges. Computer Law & Security Review, 26(1). pp. 23–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xenia Ziouvelou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Panagiotis Alexandrou
    • 2
  • Constantinos Marios Angelopoulos
    • 3
  • Orestis Evangelatos
    • 3
  • Joao Fernandes
    • 4
  • Nikos Loumis
    • 5
  • Frank McGroarty
    • 1
  • Sotiris Nikoletseas
    • 2
  • Aleksandra Rankov
    • 6
  • Theofanis Raptis
    • 2
  • Anna Ståhlbröst
    • 7
  • Sebastien Ziegler
    • 8
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Computer Technology Institute & Press DiophantusPatrasGreece
  3. 3.Université de GenèveGenevaSwitzerland
  4. 4.Alexandra Instituttet A/SAarhusDenmark
  5. 5.University of SurreyGuildfordUK
  6. 6.DunavNETNovi SadSerbia
  7. 7.Luleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden
  8. 8.Mandat InternationalGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations