Advertisement

On the Road to Unrestricted Access to Scientific Information: The Open Access Movement

  • Pali U. K. De SilvaEmail author
  • Candace K. Vance
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

Unrestricted access to scientific literature is considered essential for the pursuit and advancement of science. The issues related to restrictions imposed by the traditional subscription-based journal access model on free and unrestricted access to scientific information prompted the pursuit of alternative journal publishing models, and the open access (OA) movement was born. The OA publishing model is evolving, gaining support of the academic and research communities, research funders, policymakers, and even the traditional journal publishers. The discussion in this chapter covers the developments related to unrestricted access to scientific information, different OA publishing models, strengths, and issues related to two major models—Green (self-archiving) model and Gold (author-paid) model , concerns related to the quality of OA journals , and the emergence of predatory journals that abuse the author-paid OA model. In addition, the findings of studies that examine the impact of OA journals related to subscription-based journals are discussed.

Keywords

Scholarly journal publishing Subscription-based journal publishing Open access movement Open access publishing models Green open access Gold open access Subject repositories 

References

  1. Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arunachalam, S. (2003). Information for research in developing countries—Information technology, a friend or foe? The International Information & Library Review, 35(2–4), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartholomew, R. E. (2014). Science for sale: The rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107(10), 384–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartol, T. (2013). Information literacy and international capacity development initiatives in life sciences: AGORA, OARE, HINARI, ARDI (Research4Life-R4L). In Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice (pp. 338–344). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjork, B.-C. (2014). Open access subject repositories: An overview. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 698–706. doi: 10.1002/asi.23021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjork, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. Bmc Medicine, 10.Google Scholar
  8. Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11273.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Björk, B.-C., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2014). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosch, S., & Henderson, K. (2014). Steps down the evolutionary road—Periodicals price survey 2014. Library Journal, 139(7), 32–37.Google Scholar
  12. Bosch, S., Henderson, K., & Klusendorf, H. (2011). Periodicals price survey 2011: Under pressure, times are changing. Library Journal, 36(8), 30–34.Google Scholar
  13. Butler, D. (1999). Publishing group offers peer review on PubMed Central. Nature, 402(6758), 110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Calver, M. C., & Bradley, J. S. (2010). Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 872–880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, J., & Cox, L. (2008). Scholarly publishing practice: Third Survey 2008. ALPSP: Brighton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239–248. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crawford, W. (2002). Free electronic refereed journals: Getting past the arc of enthusiasm. Learned Publishing, 15(2), 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, P. M. (2010). Does open access lead to increased readership and citations? A randomized controlled trial of articles published in APS journals. The Physiologist, 53(6).Google Scholar
  19. Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. Faseb Journal, 25(7), 2129–2134. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337(7665). doi: 10.1136/bmj.a568
  21. Davis, P. M., & Walters, W. H. (2011). The impact of free access to the scientific literature: A review of recent research. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 99(3), 208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, J. A., & Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323(5917), 1025. doi: 10.1126/science.1154562 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Faber Frandsen, T. (2009). Attracted to open access journals: A bibliometric author analysis in the field of biology. Journal of documentation, 65(1), 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013636 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaulé, P. (2009). Access to scientific literature in India. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2548–2553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giglia, E. (2010, June 16–18). The impact factor of open access journals: data and trends. Paper Presented at the 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  28. Gilbert, N. (2009, June 15). Editor will quit over hoax paper: computer-generated manuscript accepted for publication in open-access journal. Nature. doi: 10.1038/news.2009.571
  29. Ginsparg, P. (2004). Scholarly information architecture, 1989–2015. Data Science Journal, 3, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hadro, J. (2009). Five universities sign open access funding compact. Library Journal.Google Scholar
  31. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. arXiv preprint cs/0606079.Google Scholar
  32. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2008). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: An update. Serials Review, 34(1), 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hedlund, T., Gustafsson, T., & Björk, B.-C. (2004). The open access scientific journal: An empirical study. Learned Publishing, 17(3), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henderson, K. S., & Bosch, S. (2010). Seeking the new normal: Periodicals price survey 2010. Library Journal, 135(7), 36–40.Google Scholar
  35. Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Thompson, D., et al. (2006). Effect of E-printing on citation rates in astronomy and physics. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 9, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kolata, G. (2013 April 7). Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). The New York Times. Retrieved on Oct. 15, 2016 from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
  38. Kurata, K., Morioka, T., Yokoi, K., & Matsubayashi, M. (2013). Remarkable growth of open access in the biomedical field: Analysis of PubMed articles from 2006 to 2010. PLoS One, 8(5), e60925.Google Scholar
  39. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., et al. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1395–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kurtz, M. J., & Henneken, E. A. (2007). Open Access does not increase citations for research articles from The Astrophysical Journal. arXiv preprint arXiv:0709.0896
  41. Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. McCabe, M., & Snyder, C. M. (2014). Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Economic Inquiry, 52(4), 1284–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2011). Did online access to journals change the economics literature. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), January, 23.Google Scholar
  44. McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns: A citation study from Thomson Scientific. Thomson Scientific.Google Scholar
  45. Metcalfe, T. S. (2005). The rise and citation impact of astro-ph in major journals. arXiv preprint astro-ph/0503519.Google Scholar
  46. Metcalfe, T. S. (2006). The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. Solar Physics, 239(1–2), 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Jamali, H. R. (2007). Open access in context: A user study. Journal of Documentation, 63(6), 853–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oldenburg, H. (1673). Epistle dedicatory. Philosophical Transactions, 8(92–100).Google Scholar
  51. Pickler, R., Noyes, J., Perry, L., Roe, B., Watson, R., & Hayter, M. (2014). Authors and readers beware the dark side of Open Access. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(10), 2221–2223. doi: 10.1111/jan.12589 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Shieber, S. M. (2009). Equity for open-access journal publishing. PLoS Biology, 7(8), e1000165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwarz, G. J., & Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. (2004). Demographic and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and preprints. Bulletin of American Astronomical Society, 36, 1654–1663.Google Scholar
  54. Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sotudeh, H., & Horri, A. (2007). Tracking open access journals evolution: Some considerations in open access data collection validation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1578–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suber, P. (2008). An open access mandate for the National Institutes of Health. Open Medicine, 2(2), e39–e41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2004). Periodicals price survey 2004: Closing in on open access. Library Journal, 129(7).Google Scholar
  59. Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2006). Periodicals price survey 2006: Journals in the time of Google. Library Journal, 131(7).Google Scholar
  60. Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2005). Periodicals price survey 2005: Choosing sides. Library Journal, 130(7).Google Scholar
  61. Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2007). Periodicals price survey 2007: Serial wars. Library Journal, 132(7).Google Scholar
  62. Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2008). Periodicals price survey 2008: Embracing openness. Library Journal, 134(7).Google Scholar
  63. Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2009). Periodicals price survey 2009: Reality bites. Library Journal, 135(7)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Murray State UniversityMurrayUSA

Personalised recommendations