Advertisement

Electromechanical Wave Propagation

Chapter
  • 992 Downloads
Part of the Power Electronics and Power Systems book series (PEPS)

Abstract

Several different events connected with the early application of phasor measurements prompted consideration of the propagation of transient events in power systems. The first is typical of what is shown in Fig. 11.1.

Keywords

Power System Power Flow Phasor Measurement Load Flow Voltage Magnitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Faulk, D., & Murphy, R. J. (1994). Comanche Peak Unit No 2 100 percent load rejection test—Underfrequency and voltage phasors measured across TU electric system. In Protective Relay Conference, Texas A&M, March 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy, R. J. (1995). Power disturbance monitoring. In Western Protective Relaying Conference.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murphy, R. J. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Semlyen, A. (1974). Analysis of disturbance propagation in power systems based on a homogeneous dynamic model. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 93, 676–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cresap, R. L., & Hauer, J. F. (1981). Emergence of a new swing mode in the western power system. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-100(4), 2037–2045.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grobovoy, A., & Lizalek, N. (2002). Assessment of power system properties by wave approach and structure analysis. In Fifth International Conference on Power System Management and Control, April 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dersin, P., & Lewis A. H. (1984). Aggregate feasibility sets for large power networks. In Proceedings of 9th Triennial World Congress IFAC, Budapest, Hungary (Vol. 4, pp. 2163–2168), July 1984.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thorp, J. S., Seyler, C. E., & Phadke, A. G. (1998). Electromechanical wave propagation in large electric power systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 45(6), 614–622.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thorp, J. S., Seyler, C. E., Parashar, M., & Phadke, A. G. (1998). The large scale electric power system as a distributed continuum. Power Engineering Letters, IEEE Power Engineering Review, 49–50.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parashar, M., Thorp, J. S., & Seyler, C. E. (2004). Continuum modeling of electromechanical dynamics in large-scale power systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 51, 1851–1858.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhong, Z., et al. (2005). Power system frequency monitoring network (FNET) implementation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 20(4), 1914–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dommel, H. W., & Michels, J. M. (1978). High speed relaying using traveling wave transient analysis. IEEE paper No. A78-214-9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haque, M. H. (1993). Novel decoupled load flow method. IEEE Proceedings-C, 140(1), 199–205.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, L., Parashar, M., Phadke, A. G., & Thorp, J. S. (2005). Impact of electromechanical wave propagation on power-system reliability. In Proceedings of 39th CIGRE Conference, Paris, France, August 2005.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parashar, M. (2003). Continuum modeling of electromechanical dynamics in power systems. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations