Abstract
Perceived risk is a complex and important concept. There exists a particular challenge in terms of quantifying perceived risk across different products, and regarding risk to the individual (or the user) in general. Current approaches to measuring risk perceptions are typically limited in terms of instrument content, type, and comparability. Furthermore, many existing instruments have not been constructed with recourse to the latest developments in psychometrics. This chapter briefly outlines the key concepts related to risk perception, highlights existing research, and reviews current instruments developed for tobacco products. The authors then go onto describe core elements of instrument development and the fundamentals of the three main psychometric paradigms: Classical Test Theory, Rasch Measurement Theory, and Item Response Theory. It is concluded that there is a need for new self-report instruments to measure risk perceptions of tobacco products. In addition, whereas all psychometric theories provide useful insights, the framework of Rasch Measurement Theory appears to be the most promising to enable the delivery of an instrument fit for purpose for high stakes decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brandon, T., & Baker, T. (1991). The smoking consequences questionnaire: The subjective expected utility of smoking in college students. Psychological Assessment, 3, 484–491.
Budd, G., & Preston, D. (2001). College student’s attitudes and beliefs about the consequences of smoking: Development and normative scores of a new scale. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 13(9), 421–427.
Cano, S., & Hobart, J. (2011). The problem with health measurement. Patient Preference and Adherence, 5, 279–290.
Copeland, A., Brandon, T., & Quinn, E. (1995). The smoking consequences questionnaire—Adult: Measurement of smoking outcome expectancies of experienced smokers. Psychological Assessment, 7, 484–494.
Dillard, A., Ferrer, R., Ubel, P., & Fagerlin, A. (2012). Risk perception measures’ associations with behavior intentions, affect, and cognition following colon cancer screening messages. Health Psychology, 31(1), 106–113.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2009). Patient reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
Gilliard, J., & Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. (2001). Development and validation of a multidimensional smoking behaviour questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 89(3), 499–509.
Halpern-Felsher, B., Biehl, M., Kropp, R., & Rubinstein, M. (2004). Perceived risks and benefits of smoking: Differences among adolescents with different smoking experiences and intentions. Preventive Medicine, 39, 559–567.
Heishman, S., Singleton, E., & Moolchan, E. (2003). Tobacco craving questionnaire: Reliability and validity of a new multifactorial instrument. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 5(5), 645–654.
Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in MS: the role of new psychometric methods. Monograph for the UK Health Technology Assessment Programme, 13(12), 1–200.
Institute of Medicine. (2012). Scientific standards for studies on modified risk tobacco products. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Jeffries, S., Catley, D., Okuyemi, K., Nazir, N., McCarter, K., Grobe, J., & Ahluwalia, J. (2004). Use of a brief Smoking Consequences Questionnaire for Adults (SCQ-A) in African American smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 74–77.
Lewis-Esquerre, J., Rodrigue, J., & Kahler, C. (2005). Development and validation of an adolescent smoking consequences questionnaire. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 7(1), 81–90.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Lyna, P., McBride, C., Samsa, G., & Pollak, K. (2002). Exploring the association between perceived risks of smoking and benefits to quitting—Who does not see the link? Addictive Behaviors, 27, 293–307.
Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Patrick, D., Alonso, J., Stratford, P., Knol, D., Bouter, L., & de Vet, H. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research 19, 539–549.
Morrell, H., Song, A., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2010). Predicting adolescent perceptions of the risks and benefits of cigarette smoking: A longitudinal investigation. Health Psychology, 29(6), 610–617.
Oncken, C., McKee, S., Krishnan-Sarin, S., O’Malley, S., & Mazure, C. (2005). Knowledge and perceived risk of smoking-related conditions: A survey of cigarette smokers. Preventive Medicine, 40, 779–784.
Park, E., Ostroff, J., Rakowski, W., Gareen, I., Diefenbach, M., Feibelmann, S., & Rigotti, N. (2009). Risk perceptions among participants undergoing lung cancer screening: Baseline results from the National Lung Screening Trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 268–279.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Education Research (Expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by B.D. Wright, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980. Reprinted Chicago: MESA Press, 1993. Available from www.rasch.org/books.htm).
Rees, G., Fry, A., & Cull, A. (2001). A family history of breast cancer: women’s experiences from a theoretical perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1433–1440.
Rees, V., Kreslake, J., & Cummings, K. (2009). Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: A review of tobacco industry and independent research methods. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 18(12), 3225–3240.
Rindfleisch, A., & Crockett, D. (1999). Cigarette smoking and perceived risk: A multidimensional investigation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18, 159–171.
Romer, D., & Jamieson, P. (2001a). Do adolescents appreciate the risks of smoking? Evidence from a national survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 12–21.
Romer, D., & Jamieson, P. (2001b). The role of perceived risk in starting and stopping smoking. In P. Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy (pp. 64–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shiffman, S., Pillitteri, J., Burton, S., Rohay, J., & Gitchell, J. (2001). Smokers’ beliefs about “Light” and “Ultra Light” cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 10(1), 17–23.
Song, A., Glantz, S., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2009). Perceptions of second-hand smoke risks predict future adolescent smoking initiation. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 618–625.
Tilleczek, K., & Hine, D. (2006). The meaning of smoking as health and social risk in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 273–287.
Wagener, T., Gregor, K., Busch, A., McQuaid, E., & Borrelli, B. (2010). Risk perception in smokers with children with asthma. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(6), 980–985.
Weinstein, N. (1998). Accuracy of smokers’ risk perceptions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 20(2), 135–140.
Weinstein, N., Marcus, S., & Moser, R. (2005). Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tobacco Control, 14, 55–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cano, S., Salzberger, T. (2017). Measuring Risk Perception. In: Emilien, G., Weitkunat, R., Lüdicke, F. (eds) Consumer Perception of Product Risks and Benefits. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50530-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50528-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50530-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)