Skip to main content

Reflections on Obligation and Blameworthiness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Reflections on Ethics and Responsibility
  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

Appealing to Frankfurt examples, Peter French concurs that persons can be morally blameworthy for what they have done even if they could not have done otherwise (the “lesson”). However, if “ought not” implies “can refrain from” and “ought not” is equivalent to “impermissible,” it follows that moral impermissibility requires avoidability. But, then, if the popular principle that one is blameworthy for an action only if it is impermissible for one to do it is true, the lesson should be renounced. In this paper, I suggest that French has the resources to reject this popular principle and, hence, can escape this conundrum. I then give additional reasons against this principle by drawing on some of French’s insightful thoughts about heroism and responsibility. Finally, I introduce cases in which, owing to one’s character, on various occasions one cannot do otherwise. These cases are used as a springboard to explore, briefly, whether determinism or its falsity (indeterminism) threaten obligation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I say “presumably” because it seems that French (1992, 119) accepts the principle that “ought” implies “can.”

  2. 2.

    See also, Heyd (1982) and Mellema (1991, 17, 125–29).

  3. 3.

    See, also, e.g., Mellema (1991) and Driver (1992).

  4. 4.

    As quoted by Peter van Inwagen (1983, 63–64).

  5. 5.

    For our purposes, take determinism to be the thesis that at any instant there is exactly one physically possible universe (van Inwagen 1983, 3).

  6. 6.

    I set aside agent-causal libertarian views although I have argued that such views also succumb to the problem of luck. See, e.g. Haji (2012a).

  7. 7.

    See also, Mele (2006).

References

  • Camus, Albert. 1946. The stranger. Translated by Stuart Gilbert. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Randolph. 2003. Libertarian accounts of free will. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, Julia. 1992. The suberogatory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70: 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry. 1969. Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy 66: 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, Peter. 1992. Responsibility matters. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haji, Ishtiyaque. 2000. Indeterminism, explanation, and luck. The Journal of Ethics 4: 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Deontic morality and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Incompatibilism’s allure: Principal arguments for incompatibilism. Peterbrough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012a. Reason’s debt to freedom: Normative appraisals, reasons, and free will. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. Reason, responsibility, and free will: Reply to my critics. The Journal of Ethics 16: 175–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Luck’s mischief: Obligation and blameworthiness on a thread. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, David. 1982. Supererogation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, Paul. 2011. Supererogation, inside and out: Toward an adequate scheme for common-sense morality. In Oxford studies in normative ethics volume 1, ed. Mark Timmons, 202–235. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Praise, blame, obligation, and beyond: Toward a framework for the classical conception of supererogation and kin. In Deontic logic in computer science, ed. Ron van der Meyden and Leendert van der Torre, 233–147. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Making room for going beyond the call. Mind 105: 415–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. 2013. Moral responsibility and the continuation problem. Philosophical Studies 162: 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Free will and luck. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Ultimate responsibility and dumb luck. Social Philosophy and Policy 16: 274–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellema, Gregory. 1991. Beyond the call of duty: Supererogation, obligation, and offence. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereboom, Derk. 2014. Free will, agency, and meaning in life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1953. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An essay on free will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranas, Peter B.M. 2007. I ought, therefore I can. Philosophical Studies 136: 167–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Michael J. 2008. Living with uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Moral luck: A partial map. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36: 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. The concept of moral obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Zachary Goldberg for the kind invitation to contribute to this volume, and for his useful comments. This paper was written during my tenure of a 2015–2016 Calgary Institute for the Humanities (at the University of Calgary) grant. I am most grateful to the Institute for its support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishtiyaque Haji .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haji, I. (2017). Reflections on Obligation and Blameworthiness. In: Goldberg, Z. (eds) Reflections on Ethics and Responsibility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50359-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics