Abstract
He would cut up the ceilings of the Veronese into strips so that every one might have a little piece. I don’t want everyone to have a little piece of anything, and I have a great horror of that kind of invidious jealousy which is at the bottom of the idea of a redistribution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Penguin Classics edition, 1987:396/7.
- 2.
These include books by Atkinson, A.B.; Deaton, A.; Marmot, M.; Wilkinson, R., and Pickett, K.; Piketty, T., Reich, R.B.; Stiglitz, J.; and reports by the OECD and the World Bank.
- 3.
Piketty, 2014.
- 4.
OECD, 2014.
- 5.
Wildaum and Mitchell, Financial Times, 14 January, 2016.
- 6.
Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth [RCDIW] 1979, [Cmnd. 7595]:17. The World Top Incomes Database estimates suggest that the post-tax income share of the top 1% in the UK fell from around 12% in 1945 to just over 8% in 1960.
- 7.
Atkinson, Piketty and Saez, 2011: 41, Figure 8.
- 8.
Using Luxembourg Income Survey (LIS) data for 17 industrialised countries, Harkness (2010) has explored in detail the link between female participation and inequality, while Sobhee (2011) has demonstrated the importance of changes in female employment in a variety of developing countries in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa.
- 9.
Atkinson, 2015:66.
- 10.
Atkinson, 2015:82, Figure 2.7.
- 11.
OECD, 2012:3.
- 12.
Financial Times, 26 January, 2016.
- 13.
Mishel, Gould and Bivens [EPI] 2015: Figures 2 and 8
- 14.
Mishel et al., ibid. : Figure 7.
- 15.
Mishel et al., ibid. : Figure 1.
- 16.
Atkinson, 2015:24.
- 17.
Jarowsky, Financial Times, August 7th, 2015.
- 18.
Atkinson, ibid .
- 19.
Atkinson, ibid. : Figure 1.4.
- 20.
OECD, 2012:10.
- 21.
- 22.
Ostry et al., 2014.
- 23.
- 24.
Reich, 2015.
- 25.
- 26.
Wilkinson and Pickett, 2009 and 2011.
- 27.
Wolf, M., Financial Times, 26 September 2007:15.
- 28.
Rawls, 1971:142.
- 29.
Rawls,1993. The principles as set out in 2001 [in Political Liberalism] and reproduced here differ slightly from those originally set out in 1971, p2. 50, but it would be out of place here – and irrelevant to the main argument – to embark on an analysis of the differences.
- 30.
This was, of course, implicit in his earlier 1971 formulation which required that social and economic inequalities be ‘reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage’ (1971:60) and was made explicit at numerous points in the book, such as ‘…the higher expectations of those better situated are just if and only if they work as part of a scheme which improves the expectations of the least advantaged members of society’ (loc. cit:75).
- 31.
For example, Rawls,1971:440.
- 32.
Nozick,1989:17.
- 33.
Kymlicka., 2002:108.
- 34.
Nozick, 1974:160.
- 35.
- 36.
Parfit,1991:17–18 and passim.
- 37.
This corresponds to what Broome calls ‘the principal of personal good’ in Broome, 1991:ch.8.
- 38.
Temkin, 1993:248.
- 39.
- 40.
Raz, 1986:240.
- 41.
- 42.
Nagel, 1979:116–117.
- 43.
Strictly speaking, one ought to distinguish between three concepts, namely (i) being the worst off; (ii) having greatest needs; and (iii) deriving the most benefit from redistributive policies. But for purposes of the point made here it is assumed that all three are sufficiently closely correlated.
- 44.
- 45.
Before the concept of ‘prioritarianism’ came into widespread use it was discussed by Broome as an ‘additively separable utility function’, in Broome, 1991:179ff.
- 46.
- 47.
Crisp, 2003: 757.
- 48.
See also Arneson, 2000.
- 49.
Atkinson, 2015:9.
Bibliography
Arneson, R., 2000, ‘Luck Egalitarianism’, Ethics, 110/2.
Atkinson, A., 2015, Inequality: What Can Be Done, Harvard University Press.
Brighouse, H., and Swift, A., 2006, ‘Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods’, Ethics, 116.
Broome, J., 1991, Weighing Goods, Blackwell, Oxford.
Brown, C., 2005, ‘Priority or Sufficiency…or Both?’, Economics and Philosophy, 21.
Fleurbaey, M., 2006, ‘Social Welfare, Priority to the Worst Off, and the Dimensions of Individual Well-Being’, in Farina, F., and Savagli, E. (eds.), Inequality and Economic Integration, Routledge, London.
Frankfurt, H., 2015, On Inequality, Princeton University Press.
Kymlicka, W., 2002, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, (2nd edn.), Oxford University Press.
Marmot, M., 2004, The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects our Health and Longevity, Times Books/Henry Holt, New York.
Marmot, M., 2015, The Health Gap: The Challenge of the Unequal World, Bloomsbury, London.
Nagel, T., 1979, Mortal Questions, Cambridge University Press.
Nozick, R., 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books, New York, and Blackwell, Oxford.
Nozick, R., 1989, The Examined Life, Simon and Schuster, New York.
OECD, 2012, ‘Income Inequality and Growth: The Role of Taxes and Transfers’, OECD Economics Department Policy Notes, No 9.
OECD, 2014, Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth, Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper, No.163.
Ostry, D., and Berg, A., et al., 2014, Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth, IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/14/02.
Parfit, D., 1991, ‘Equality or Priority’, [The Lindley Lecture], University of Kansas.
Peyton Young, H., 1994, Equity: In Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Piketty, T., 2014, Capital in the Twenty First Century, 2014, English translation published by Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rawls, J., 1993, Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, New York.
Rawls, J., 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement’, [ed. E. Kelly], Harvard University Press, MA.
Raz, J., 1986, The Morality of Freedom, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Reich, R.B., 2015, Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few, Knopf.
Royal Commission on the Distribution of Income and Wealth, Report No 7: Fourth Report on the Standing Reference, July 1979, Cmnd 7595, p. 17.
Stiglitz, J., 2012, The Price of Inequality, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.
Temkin, L., 1993, Inequality, Oxford University Press.
Wildaum, G., and Mitchell, T., 2016, ‘China Income Inequality Among World’s Worst’, Financial Times, 14 January.
Wilkinson, R., and Pickett, K., 2011, The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, U.K.
de Jasay, A, 2010a, ‘Inspecting the Foundations of Liberalism’,Economics Affairs, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
Atkinson, A, Piketty, T and Saez, E, 2011, ‘Top Incomes in the Long Run of History’, Journal of Economic Literature, 49.
Harkness, S, 2010, ‘The contribution of women’s employment and earnings to household income inequality: A cross-country analysis’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series, No. 531.
Sobhee, S K., 2011, ‘Greater Female Employment Participation as a Catalyst to Reducing Income Inequality in Developing Countries’. Paper presented at the International Conference on Applied Economics (ICOAE), Perugia, Italy, 26–28 Aug 2011.
Mishel, L, Gould, E, and Bivens, J, 2015, ‘Wage Stagnation In Nine Charts’, Economic Policy Institute, January 6, 2015.
Stiglitz, J., 2015, The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and what we can do about them. W. W. Norton.
Frankfurt, H., 1997, ‘Equality and Respect’, Social Research, 64/1.
Crisp, R., 2003, ‘Equality, Priority and Compassion’, Ethics, 113.
de Jasay, A., 2010b, Freedom, “‘rights’ and rights”: in The Collected Papers of Anthony de Jasay, Indianapolis: The Liberty Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beckerman, W. (2017). Equality: ‘Fact’ or ‘Value’?. In: Economics as Applied Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50319-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50319-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50318-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50319-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)