Skip to main content

Shades of the Secular

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Secular Landscape
  • 509 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the concept of secularity in all of its complexity. Secularity is situated along a continuum and discussed in terms of belief, behavior, belonging and benefitting. The chapter then turns to a review of major theorists of secularization and what they have in common. The chapter closes with a proposed interdisciplinary and integrative theory of secularization which emphasizes subcultural tightening and self-dimensionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For those interested in learning more about the history of secular philosophy, I recommend three texts. The first is sociologist Randall Collins’ The Sociology of Philosophies (2000), the second is historian Jennifer Hecht’s Doubt (2004) and the third is historian Tim Whitmarsh’s (2016) Battling the Gods.

  2. 2.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/08/us/08secular.html?_r=0

  3. 3.

    http://catalog.pitzer.edu/preview_entity.php?catoid=3&ent_oid=153&returnto=171

  4. 4.

    Naturalistic, scientific philosophy can easily be found prior to Renaissance and Enlightenment-era Europe. It can be found in Ancient Greece with, for example, the rationalism of Heraclitus or the atomism of Democritus. Likewise, the “Islamic Golden Age,” of math and astronomy, which flourished while Europe descended into the Dark Ages, was also a period of widespread natural philosophy. Indeed, this Islamic Golden Age produced perhaps the first non-Western school of scientific sociology with the work of Ibn Khaldun. So, we must say that Comte was roughly, if not precisely, correct about his theory of the evolution of human knowledge. His “Law of the Three Stages” is, in the end, needlessly linear and Eurocentric.

  5. 5.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment

  6. 6.

    This is not true, of course. Church-based social networks tend to be tight and dense, and such networks may be ideal for providing assistance with the calamities of lifelike unemployment. Not only do such networks provide emotional and financial support, they can also be a pipeline to future job interviews (see Putnam and Campbell 2010).

  7. 7.

    Specifically, Thomas Luckmann, Peter Berger, Bryan Wilson, David Martin, Richard Fenn, Talcott Parsons and Robert Bellah.

  8. 8.

    In our modern globalized world—and in this age of social media—threat perception, and tightening, is destined to begin picking up speed.

  9. 9.

    Other than the three works of Elias cited, I recommend reading both the 1987 Theory, Culture and Society issue dedicated to Elias’ work (volume 4, issue 2, edited by Mike Featherstone) and Steven Pinker’s (2011) use of Elias’ theory to explain large-scale declines in violence over the last 500 or so years. See also Linklater and Mennell (2010).

  10. 10.

    Elias would add top-down expectations for mannerly comportment that result from the centralization of authority, which is itself a sign of cultural tightening. To simplify, as regards multidimensionality of the self, I focus here just on the impact of a growing division of labor and the geographic mobility and network diversity this entails.

  11. 11.

    There is also evidence that, under perceived duress and threat, insecurely attached people will succumb to god belief in order to compensate and find relief for the psychological turmoil (Granqvist and Hagekull 1999; Granqvist and Kirkpatrick 2013). Thus, though peoples’ general attachment style will correspond to the internal working model developed in childhood, this model may be flexible enough to accommodate attachment to God or spirits under distressing conditions in adulthood.

  12. 12.

    This doesn’t mean that political elites in the earliest human societies weren’t self-interested and Machiavellian—they undoubtedly were at least to some degree; see Hayden and Gargett (1990).

  13. 13.

    A not-insignificant problem for this thesis is the historical prevalence of female shamans and medicinal practitioners (e.g., Tedlock 2005). I suppose the counterclaim would be that shamans, medical practitioners and early political elites were relatively more likely to be men. If this is the case, what accounts for this relative likelihood? Some will insist that males co-opted these tribal roles coercively because they were physically larger and more dispositionally aggressive due to higher baseline levels of testosterone, and though this is plausible, as far as I am aware, nobody knows for certain.

  14. 14.

    Retrieved on 7/18/2016 from Barash’s online editorial “Is God a Silverback?” in the online cultural magazine aeon: https://aeon.co/essays/how-monotheists-modelled-god-on-a-harem-keeping-alpha-male

  15. 15.

    Bengtson and his collaborators (2013) also found that grandparents aid in the intergenerational transmission of religion. When grandparents replace parents’ attempts at religious socialization of children (in the case of religiously disinterested, or deceased, parents) and especially when grandparents reinforce parents’ preexisting efforts at religious socialization, beliefs are more likely to be transmitted from one generation to the next. However, if grandparents critique or subvert parents’ attempts at religious socialization, or if grandparents simply ignore parents’ attempts to socialize their children, the effectiveness of religious transmission declines.

  16. 16.

    Twenty percent converted to some denomination of Protestantism, and five percent converted to Catholicism.

References

  • Apicella, C.L., F.W. Marlowe, J.H. Fowler, and N.A. Christakis. 2012. Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481(7382): 497–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.O., and B.G. Smith. 2015. American secularism: Cultural contours of nonreligious belief systems. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, N. 2011. A cross-national test of the uncertainty hypothesis of religious belief. Cross-Cultural Research 45(3): 318–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. 1985. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V.L., N.M. Putney, and S.C. Harris. 2013. Families and faith: How religion is passed down across generations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R. 2012. Svabhāvavāda and the Cārvāka/Lokāyata: A historical overview. Journal of Indian Philosophy 40(6): 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. 2012. Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. 1965. Conditions of agricultural growth. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Environment, population, and technology in primitive societies. Population and Development Review 2(1): 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. 1969. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. attachment. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S. 2006. Secularization and the impotence of individualized religion. Hedgehog Review 8(1.2): 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Secularization: In defense of an unfashionable theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P.J., and J.E. Stets. 2009. Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. 2006. Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. The Hedgehog Review 8(1–2): 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. 1968. Yanomamo: The fierce people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., and B. Lerro. 2014. Social change: Globalization from the stone age to the present. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, M. 1994. Secularization as declining religious authority. Social Forces 72(3): 749–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., N. Hendren, P. Kline, E. Saez, and N. Turner. 2014. Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility. The American Economic Review 104(5): 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choksy, J.K. 2003. Hagiography and monotheism in history: Doctrinal encounters between Zoroastrianism, Judaism and Christianity. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 14(4): 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. 2000. The sociology of philosophies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. 1876. System of positive polity (Vol. III). London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’andrade, R. 2001. A cognitivist’s view of the units debate in cultural anthropology. Cross-Cultural Research 35(2): 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerath, N.J. III. 2007. Secularization and sacralization deconstructed and reconstructed. In The SAGE handbook of the sociology of religion, ed. N.J. Demerath and J.A. Beckford, 27–80. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. 2006. Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The world before yesterday: What can we learn from traditional societies? New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere, K. 1981. Secularization: A multi-dimensional concept. Current Sociology 29(2): 3–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Secularization theories and sociological paradigms: A reformulation of the private-public dichotomy and the problem of societal integration. Sociology of Religion 46(4): 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Towards an integrated perspective of the processes related to the descriptive concept of secularization. Sociology of Religion 60(3): 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1893[1997]. The division of labor in society. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. 1978. The civilizing process, vol. 1: The history of manners. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. The civilizing process, vol. 2: State formation and civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. The court society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The retreat of sociologists into the present. Theory Culture & Society 4(2): 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C.L., and R. Thornhill. 2012. Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(2): 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, E., and K. Preisendanz. 1998. Indian school of materialism. In Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. Craig, Vol. 6. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, H.A. 2015. Alpha god: The psychology of religious violence and oppression. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M.J., J.L. Raver, L. Nishii, L.M. Leslie, J. Lun, B.C. Lim, L. Duan, A. Almaliach, S. Ang, J. Arnadottir, and Z. Aycan. 2011. Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332(6033): 1100–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granqvist, P., and B. Hagekull. 1999. Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: Profiling socialized correspondence and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38(2): 254–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granqvist, P., and L.A. Kirkpatrick. 2013. Religion, spirituality, and attachment. In APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality: Context, theory, and research, ed. K. Pargament, J. Exline, and J. Jones, 130–155. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granqvist, P., M. Mikulincer, and P.R. Shaver. 2010. Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14(1): 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T.R. 1970. Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 2008. Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly 25(4): 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, J.K. 1987. Toward desacralizing secularization theory. Social Forces 65(3): 587–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.R., and M.J. Gelfand. 2014. Tightness–looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(22): 7990–7995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.R. 1995. Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review 102(3): 458–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B., and R. Gargett. 1990. Big man, big heart? A Mesoamerican view of the emergence of complex society. Ancient Mesoamerica 1(1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, T.B. 2011. Does religion influence fertility in developing countries. Population Research and Policy Review 30(3): 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, J.M. 2004. Doubt: A history: The great doubters and their legacy of innovation, from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. 1668[1994]. Leviathan. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A.R. 1983[2003]. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M.A., J.R. Adelman, and R.D. Blagg. 2010. Religion in the face of uncertainty: An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14(1): 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoverd, W.J., and C.G. Sibley. 2013. Religion, deprivation and subjective wellbeing: Testing a religious buffering hypothesis. International Journal of Wellbeing 3(2): 182–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immerzeel, T., and F. Van Tubergen. 2013. Religion as reassurance? Testing the insecurity theory in 26 European countries. European Sociological Review 29(2): 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., and C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2007. Why didn’t religion disappear? Re-examining the secularization thesis. In Cultures and globalization: Conflicts and tensions, ed. H. Anheier and Y.R. Isar, 253–257. New York: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karakoç, E., and B. Başkan. 2012. Religion in politics: How does inequality affect public secularization? Comparative Political Studies 45(12): 1510–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A.C., J.A. Whitson, D. Gaucher, and A.D. Galinsky. 2009. Compensatory control achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18(5): 264–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, K., L. Cao, K.J. O’Shea, and H. Wang. 2014. A cross-culture, cross-gender comparison of perspective taking mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 281: 20140388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L.A. 2005. Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S. 2002. Culture and basic psychological processes—Toward a system view of culture: Comments on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin 128(1): 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanman, J.A. 2012. The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization. Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, G. 2005. Ecological-evolutionary theory: Principles and applications. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, L. 1981. Big man: A short terminological history. American Anthropologist 83(4): 900–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A., and S. Mennell. 2010. Norbert Elias, the civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations—An overview and assessment. History and Theory 49(3): 384–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J., and J. Ferrie. 2013. Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850. The American Economic Review 103(4): 1109–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. 2004. The status syndrome: How your social standing affects your health and life expectancy. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, M.W. 2013. Human identity and the evolution of societies. Human Nature 24(3): 219–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, S. C., W. Mirola, and M. Emerson, eds. 2011. Sociology of religion: A reader. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. Jr. 1978. Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. White Plains: M. E. Sharpe.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D.R., R. Trudeau, and M. Schaller. 2011. On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: Four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(3): 318–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D.R., M. Schaller, and P. Suedfeld. 2013. Pathogens and politics: Further evidence that parasite prevalence predicts authoritarianism. PloS One 8(5): e62275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na, J., I. Grossmann, M.E. Varnum, S. Kitayama, R. Gonzalez, and R.E. Nisbett. 2010. Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(14): 6192–6197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenzu, H. J., T. Meleghy, and P. Meyer, eds. 2008. The new evolutionary Social Science: Human nature, social behavior, and social change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. 2004. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A. 2013. Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., J. Henrich, and E. Slingerland. 2013. Religious prosociality: A synthesis. In Cultural evolution, ed. P. Richerson and M. Christiansen, 365–378. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., A.F. Shariff, W.M. Gervais, A.K. Willard, R.A. McNamara, E. Slingerland, and J. Henrich. 2016. The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14001356.

  • Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2007. Uneven secularization in the United States and Western Europe. In Democracy and the new religious pluralism, ed. T. Banchoff, 31–58. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. 2005. Cross-national correlations of quantifiable societal health with popular religiosity and secularism in the prosperous democracies. Journal of Religion and Society 7: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The chronic dependence of popular religiosity upon dysfunctional psychological conditions. Evolutionary Psychology 7(3): 398–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelto, P.J. 1968. The differences between “tight” and “loose” societies. Society 5(5): 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. 2011. The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B.G., C. Apicella, Q.D. Atkinson, E. Cohen, R.A. McNamara, A.K. Willard, E. Cohen, R.A. Mcnamara, A.K. Willard, D. Xygalatas, A. Norenzayan, and J. Henrich. 2016. Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature 530: 327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D., and D.E. Campbell. 2010. American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, T.J. 2009. Is personal insecurity a cause of cross-national differences in the intensity of religious belief? Journal of Religion and Society 11(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiter, S., and F. Van Tubergen. 2009. Religious attendance in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 60 countries. American Journal of Sociology 115(3): 863–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M.D. 1963. Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: Political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5(3): 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M., and J.H. Park. 2011. The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(2): 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M., D.R. Murray, and A. Bangerter. 2015. Implications of the behavioural immune system for social behaviour and human health in the modern world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 370(1669): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwadel, P. 2011. Age, period, and cohort effects on religious activities and beliefs. Social Science Research 40: 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwedler, J. 2006. Faith in moderation: Islamist parties in Jordan and Yemen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. 2014. Changing faith: The dynamics and consequences of Americans’ shifting religious identities. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D.E. 2004. Religious intermarriage in the United States: Trends, patterns, and predictors. Social Science Research 33(4): 606–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaldino, P.E. in press. The evolution of social self: Multidimensionality of social identity solves the coordination problems of a society. In Beyond the meme: Dynamical structures in cultural evolution, ed. W.C. Wimsatt and A.C. Love. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solt, F., P. Habel, and T. Grant. 2011. Economic inequality, relative power, and religiosity. Social Science Quarterly 92(2): 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. 1999. Secularization, RIP. Sociology of Religion 60(3): 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., and R. Finke. 2000. Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. 1980. Symbolic interactionism. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., and P.J. Burke. 2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63(4): 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talhelm, T., X. Zhang, S. Oishi, C. Shimin, D. Duan, X. Lan, and S. Kitayama. 2014. Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science 344(6184): 603–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedlock, B. 2005. The woman in the shaman’s body: Reclaiming the feminine in religion and medicine. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and C.L. Fincher. 2014. Collectivism–individualism, family ties, and philopatry. In The parasite-stress theory of values and sociality, ed. R. Thornhill and C.L. Fincher, 113–170. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, F. 1887[2002]. Community and society. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen, O. 1991. The secularization paradigm: A systematization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30(4): 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.H. 2010. Theoretical principles of sociology: Vol. 1, macrodynamics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.H., and A. Maryanski. 2016[2008]. On the origin of societies by natural selection. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uskul, A.K., S. Kitayama, and R.E. Nisbett. 2008. Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(25): 8552–8556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, F., J.H. Park, B.L. Koenig, and J. Graham. 2012. Regional variation in pathogen prevalence predicts endorsement of group-focused moral concerns. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(5): 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, F., B.L. Koenig, J. Graham, and J.H. Park. 2014. Moral concerns across the United States: Associations with life-history variables, pathogen prevalence, urbanization, cognitive ability, and social class. Evolution and Human Behavior 35(6): 464–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnum, M.E., I. Grossmann, S. Kitayama, and R.E. Nisbett. 2010. The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1): 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, P. 2014. Religion and family life: An overview of current research and suggestions for future research. Religions 5(2): 402–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D. 2003. Intermarriage and the demography of secularization. The British Journal of Sociology 54(1): 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The rise and fall of fuzzy fidelity in Europe. European Sociological Review 25(2): 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.S., K.R. Hill, M.V. Flinn, and R.M. Ellsworth. 2011. Evolutionary history of hunter-gatherer marriage practices. PLoS One 6(4): e19066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1922[1978]. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1930[1992]. The protestant ethic and the spirt of capitalism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. 1959. The evolution of culture: The development of civilization to the fall of Rome. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, T. 2016. Battling the gods: Atheism in the ancient world. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer, R., K. Kuwabara, and M.W. Macy. 2009. The false enforcement of unpopular norms. American Journal of Sociology 115(2): 451–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Bryan. 2001. Secularization and its discontents. In Modernity: Critical concepts, Volume II: Cultural modernity, ed. M. Waters, 218–235. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamane, D. 1997. Secularization on trial: In defense of a neosecularization paradigm. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36(1): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P., L.W. Galen, and F.L. Pasquale. 2016. The nonreligious: Understanding secular people and societies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCaffree, K. (2017). Shades of the Secular. In: The Secular Landscape. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50262-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50262-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50261-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50262-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics