Advertisement

Comparison of IPv4-over-IPv6 (4over6) and Dual Stack Technologies in Dynamic Configuration for IPv4/IPv6 Address

  • Ta Te Lu
  • Cheng Yen Wu
  • Wen Yen Lin
  • Hsin Pei Chen
  • Kuang Po Hsueh
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 63)

Abstract

IPv4 and IPv6 technologies face many challenges on LAN or the Internet such as transition mechanisms. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed a variety of solutions, e.g. Dual stack, IPv6-in-IPv4 (IPv4-IPv6), and IPv4-over-IPv6 (4over6). Clients use manual, stateful, or stateless auto configuration to get IPv6 addresses. Auto configuration with Stateful Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) protocol automatically configures IPv6 address through the router into the LAN, which is the best allocation choice. The DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 (DHCP 4o6) server used 4over6 and is considered to generally be the best plan. In this paper, we set up a network communications platform and performed an effectiveness analysis comparing DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 (DHCP 4o6) servers individually with Dual Stack and 4over6 tunnel mechanisms. Experimental routing performances show that the routing path from 7 nodes with Dual Stack was better than 4over6 by 17.329%.

Keywords

IPv6 transition DHCPv6 IPv4-over-IPv6 Dual Stack 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cui, Y., Wu, J., Wu, P.: Public IPv4-over-IPv6 Access Network. IETF RFC 7040 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bound, J., Packard, H., Ericsson, B., Lemon, V., Nominum, T., Perkins, C., Carney, M., Microsystems, S.: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6). IETF RFC 3315 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Imadali, S., Vèque, V., Petrescu, A.: Analyzing Dynamic IPv6 Address Auto-configuration Techniques for Group IP-Based Vehicular Communications. 39th IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops (LCN Workshops), pp. 722 – 729, France (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conta, A., Deering, S., Gupta, M.: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification. IETF RFC 4443 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomson, S., Narten, T., Jinmei, T.: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration. IETF RFC 4862 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woodyatt, J., Lee, Y., Durand, A., Droms, R.: RFC 6333 Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion. IETF RFC 6333 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, L., Cui, Y,. Sun, J., Sun, Q.: The research of 4over6 transition system deployment for IPv6 backbone. 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT), pp. 912 –915, Beijing, China (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zilong, L., Jiang, D., Yong, C., Chaokun, Z.: Dynamic Configuration for IPv4/IPv6 Address Mapping in 4over6 Technology. 9th IEEE International Conference on Anti-counterfeiting, Security, and Identification (ASID), pp. 132 –136, Beijing, China (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coltun, R., Ferguson, D., Moy, J., Lindem, A.: OSPF for IPv6. IETF RFC 5340 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ta Te Lu
    • 1
  • Cheng Yen Wu
    • 1
  • Wen Yen Lin
    • 2
  • Hsin Pei Chen
    • 1
  • Kuang Po Hsueh
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Computer Science and Engineering, Chien Hsin University of Science and TechnologyTaoyuanTaiwan
  2. 2.Digital Multimedia Technology, Vanung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations