Skip to main content

Exploring the Relation Between Game Experience and Game Mechanics for Bodily-Kinesthetic Players

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10056))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a research on investigating whether tailoring the game mechanics and interaction modality of a game has an impact on the game experience of the player in the case of players with a high bodily-kinesthetic intelligence (with respect to the theory of Multiple Intelligences). For this purpose, we designed and developed a game called LeapBalancer, and evaluated it with a group of kinesthetic and a group of non-kinesthetic players. The results of the evaluation show that considering the intelligences of the players during game design matters and affects their game experience. In addition, we analyzed the players’ in-game behavior to explain the results. The finding are also important for learning games, since research suggest that good game experience is positively correlated with improved learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.leapmotion.com/.

  2. 2.

    http://wise.vub.ac.be/dpl/.

References

  1. Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Butler, H., Wallace, P., Graesser, A., Halpern, D.: Operation ARIES!: a serious game for teaching scientific inquiry. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 169–195. Springer, London (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Poels, K., De Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W.: It is always a lot of fun!’: exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play, pp. 83–89. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. HarperPerennial, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Webster, J., Trevino, L.K., Ryan, L.: The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 9(4), 411–426 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. J. Educ. Media 29(3), 241–250 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vandewaetere, M., Cornillie, F., Clarebout, G., Desmet, P.: Adaptivity in educational games: including player and gameplay characteristics. Int. J. High. Educ. 2(2), 106–114 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sajjadi, P., Broeckhoven, F., Troyer, O.: Dynamically adaptive educational games: a new perspective. In: Göbel, S., Wiemeyer, J. (eds.) GameDays 2014. LNCS, vol. 8395, pp. 71–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05972-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner, H.: Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sajjadi, P., Vlieghe, J., De Troyer, O.: Relation between multiple intelligences and game preferences: an evidence-based approach. In: 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning: ECGBL2016, pp. 565–574 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sajjadi, P., Vlieghe, J., De Troyer, O.: Evidence-based mapping between the theory of multiple intelligences and game mechanics for the purpose of player-centered serious game design. In: VS-Games 2016, 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (2016, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sicart, M.: Defining game mechanics. In: Game Studies, pp. 1–14 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Components of MI. http://multipleintelligencesoasis.org/about/the-components-of-mi/. Accessed 16 Mar 2016

  13. Brody, N.: Geocentric theory: a valid alternative to Gardner’s theory of intelligence. In: Howard Gardner Under Fire Rebel Psychol. Faces his critics, pp. 73–94 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Waterhouse, L.: Inadequate evidence for multiple intelligences Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence theories. Educ. Psychol. 41(4), 247–255 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Waterhouse, L.: Multiple intelligences, the mozart effect, and emotional intelligence. Crit. Rev. 41(4), 207–225 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, J.: Theory of multiple intelligences: is it a scientific theory? Teachers Coll. Rec. 106(1), 17–23 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCue, P.: The crucial role of animated children’s educational games. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Educators Program, p. 6 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katryna, S.: Cognitive behavioral game design: a unified model for designing serious games. Front. Psychol. 5 (2014). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00028

  19. Chuang, T.-Y., Sheng-Hsiung, S.: Using mobile console games for multiple intelligences and education. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ. 6(3–4), 204–217 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lotfi, E., Mohammed, B.: Teaching Arabic sign language through an interactive web based serious game. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 116(3), 12–18 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khademi, M., Mousavi Hondori, H., McKenzie, A., Dodakian, L., Lopes, C.V., Cramer, S.C.: Free-hand interaction with leap motion controller for stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1663–1668. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vattel, L., Riconscente, M.: Learning geoscience concepts through play & kinesthetic tracking. In: Games Learning Society Conference, p. 12 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P.: Multiple intelligences profiling questionnaire. In: Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P. (eds.) Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education, pp. 1–13. SensePublishers, Dordrecht (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. IJsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Poels, K., Jurgelionis, A., Bellotti, F.: Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In: International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, vol. 620, pp. 1–4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. IJsselsteijn, W., Van Den Hoogen, W., Klimmt, C., De Kort, Y., Lindley, C., Mathiak, K., Poels, K., Ravaja, N., Turpeinen, M., Vorderer, P.: Measuring the experience of digital game enjoyment. In: Proceedings of Measuring Behavior, pp. 88–89 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pejman Sajjadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sajjadi, P., Lo-A-Njoe, A., Vlieghe, J., De Troyer, O. (2016). Exploring the Relation Between Game Experience and Game Mechanics for Bodily-Kinesthetic Players. In: Bottino, R., Jeuring, J., Veltkamp, R. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10056. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50181-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50182-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics