Advertisement

Using Comparative Behavior Analysis to Improve the Impact of Serious Games on Students’ Learning Experience

  • Dominique Jaccard
  • Jarle HulaasEmail author
  • Ariane Dumont
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10056)

Abstract

In the last decade, the use of serious games as a teaching and learning tool has steadily increased in many disciplines. Nevertheless, serious games are still facing crucial challenges, such as their integration in the global learning process. On the other hand, with the increased adoption of online applications and courses, it is becoming possible to collect and centralize large amounts of trace data generated by players. Such data may be used to produce statistics on students’ behaviors inside pedagogical serious games, both as individuals and aggregated as groups (e.g., classrooms). In this paper we propose a classification of potential uses of statistics in serious games and give new insights into how statistical analysis of groups’ behavior may impact positively on the learning process. We also present experimental results obtained during a large-scale game deployment using the Wegas platform, our open source platform for game authoring and execution.

Keywords

Serious games Statistics Comparative behavior analysis Classroom orchestration Teacher empowerment Learning analytics Competency management Deep learning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all developers of the Wegas platform as well as to the teachers who gave their feedback on the tool.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnab, S., et al.: Towards performance prediction using in-game measures. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold, K.E.: Signals: applying academic analytics. EDUCAUSE Q. 33, 1 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bloom, B.S., et al.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company, New York (1956)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyle, E.A., Connolly, T.M., Hainey, T.: The role of psychology in understanding the impact of computer game. Entertain. Comput. 2, 69–74 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bybee, R.W.: Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practice. Heinemann, Portsmouth (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clow, D.: The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge - LAK 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., Wieman, C.: Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332(6031), 862–864 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dumont, A., Berthiaume, D.: La pédagogie inversée, De Boeck, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Entwistle, N.: Understanding classroom learning. Hodder and Stoughton, London (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 4(5/6), 304 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freeman, S., et al.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 8410–8415 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    GALA R&D Roadmap on Serious Games no. 3, Deliverable no. 1.7 (4th year) of the Game and Learning Alliance (GaLA) (2014). http://www.galanoe.eu/index.php/documents
  13. 13.
    Goddard, Y., Goddard, M.: A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teach. Coll. Rec. 109(4), 877–896 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jaccard, D., Riboni S.: Simprojet: an innovative simulation platform for experiential learning in project management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Valencia, Spain, pp. 471–477 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. J. Organ. Behav. 8(4), 359–360 (1984). Prentice Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marsh, C.J.: Key concepts for understanding curriculum. Falmer Press, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Michaelsen, L., Sweet, M., Parmelee, D.: Team-based learning: small group learning’s next big step. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 116 (2009). Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moreno-Ger, P., et al.: Learning Analytics for SGs, Deliverable no. 2.4 (4th year) of the Game and Learning Alliance (GaLA) (2014). http://www.galanoe.eu/index.php/documents
  19. 19.
    Rogers, C.R.: Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become, pp. 111–114. C.E. Merrill Pub. Co., Columbus (1969)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanchez, E., Ney, M., Labat, J.-M.: Jeux sérieux et pédagogie universitaire: de la conception à l’évaluation des apprentissages. Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie universitaire, Pédagogie Universitaire Numérique 8(1–2), 48–57 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Serrano-Laguna, A., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., Fernández-Manjón, B.: Tracing a Little for Big Improvements: Application of Learning Analytics and Videogames for Student Assessment. In: 4th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Slade, S., Prinsloo, P.: Learning analytics: ethical issues and dilemmas. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1510–1529 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Verbert, K., et al.: Learning analytics dashboard applications. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1500–1509 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verbert, K., et al.: Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. J. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18(6), 1499–1514 (2014). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Economic Forum: New Vision for Education: Fostering Social and Emotional Learning through Technology (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique Jaccard
    • 1
  • Jarle Hulaas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ariane Dumont
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and EngineeringUniversity of Applied Sciences of Western SwitzerlandYverdon-les-bainsSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations