Abstract
Adequate measurement of action competence remains a central target of vocational education and training research; adequate measurement approaches in the vocational domain clearly are a prerequisite for accountable systems to authorize access to professional activities, as well as for future large-scale assessments. For the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry, competence assessments in the area of business and commerce rely mainly on final examinations that attempt to measure not just knowledge but also action competence. To evaluate and improve a test instrument, this chapter considers two questions: (1) how valid and reliable was the original test-format, and (2) how valid and reliable are the corresponding assessment results of a recently developed prototype? The study relies on statistical procedures (e.g., IRT scaling), applied empirically to a sample of 1768 final examinations of industrial managers in the original format, and to 479 industrial managers taking a prototype new format. The advanced prototype version appears as a more valid and accurate instrument to capture action competence. We conclude that several practical steps can be undertaken to improve current assessment practices in the area of business and commerce.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The data were acquired from six offices of the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry: Luneburg, Hanover, Frankfurt on Main, Munich, Saarland, and Nuremberg.
- 2.
Acquired from GCCI statistics for Munich and Upper Bavaria.
- 3.
Acquired from GCCI statistics for Chemnitz.
- 4.
Munich, Hanover, Bielefeld and Paderborn.
References
Achtenhagen, F., & Weber, S. (2003). “Authentizität” in der Gestaltung beruflicher Lernumgebung [“Authenticity” in the design of vocational learning environments]. In A. Bredow, R. Dobischat, & J. Rottmann (Eds.), Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik von A-Z. Grundlagen, Kernfragen und Perspektiven: Festschrift für Günter Kutscha (pp. 185–199). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider.
Baethge, M., Arends, L., & Winther, E. (2009). International large-scale assessment on vocational and occupational education and training. In F. Oser, U. Renold, E. G. John, E. Winther, & S. Weber (Eds.), VET boost: Towards a theory of professional competences: Essays in honor of Frank Achtenhagen (pp. 3–24). Rotterdam: Sense.
BBIG (Berufsbildungsgesetz) 1. (2005, April). Retrieved from http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/bbig_2005/gesamt.pdf.
Billett, S. (2006). Work, change and workers. Dordrecht: Springer.
BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). (2008). Framework programme for the promotion of empirical educational research. Bonn: Author.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cooking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. New York: National Academy of Sciences.
Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.1.179.
Fischer, G. H. (1974). Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests [An introduction to the theory of psychological tests]. Bern: Huber.
GCCI (German Chamber of Commerce and Industry), & Aufgabenstelle für käufmännische Abschluss- und Zwischenprüfungen (AKA). (Eds.). (2009). Prüfungskatalog für die IHK-Abschlussprüfungen [Test catalog for the GCCI’s final examinations]. Nürnberg: AKA.
Gelman, R., & Greeno, J. G. (1989). On the nature of competence: Principles for understanding in a domain. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing and learning: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 125–186). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Gijbels, D., Van De Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van Den Bossche, P. (2006). New learning environments and constructivism: The students’ perspective. Instructional Science, 34, 213–226. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-3347-z.
Greeno, J. G., Riley, M. S., & Gelman, R. (1984). Conceptual competence and children’s counting. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 94–143. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(84)90005-7.
Hacker, W. (1986). Arbeitspsychologie. Psychische Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten [Action-regulation-theory. Psychological regulation of occupational actions]. Bern: Huber.
Hambleton, R. K., & Russell, W. J. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational Measurement, 12(3), 38–47. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x.
Kiplinger, L. (2008). Reliability of large scale assessment and accountability systems. In K. E. Ryan & L. A. Shepard (Eds.), The future of test-based educational accountability (pp. 93–113). New York: Routledge.
Klotz, V. K., & Winther, E. (2012). Kompetenzmessung in der kaufmännischen Berufsausbildung: Zwischen Prozessorientierung und Fachbezug [Competence measurement in commercial vocational training: Between processual and content-related perspectives]. Bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik —Online, 22.
Koeppen, K., Hartig, J., Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2008). Current issues in competence modeling and assessment. Journal of Psychology, 216(2), 61–73.
Kuhl, J. (1994). A theory of action and state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action vs. state orientation (pp. 97–129). Seattle: Hogrefe.
Lehmann, R., & Seeber, S. (Eds.). (2007). ULME III. Untersuchung von Leistungen, Motivation und Einstellungen der Schülerinnen und Schüler in den Abschlussklassen der Berufsschulen [ULME III. Examination of performance, motivation and attitudes of students at the end of their vocational training]. Hamburg: HIBB.
Mislevy, R. J. (2007). Validity by design. Educational Researcher, 36, 463–469. doi:10.3102/0013189X07311660.
Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement, 25(4), 6–20. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x.
Mislevy, R. J., & Riconscente, M. (2005). Evidence-centered assessment design: Layers, structures, and terminology (PADI Technical report 9). Menlo Park: SRI International.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.
Nickolaus, R. (2011). Die Erfassung fachlicher Kompetenz und ihrer Entwicklungen in der beruflichen Bildung: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven [Assessing professional expertise and its development: Current state of research and future perspectives]. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia (Ed.), Stationen empirischer Bildungsforschung: Traditionslinien und Perspektiven (pp. 331–351). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Nickolaus, R., & Norwig, K. (2009). Mathematische Kompetenzen von Auszubildenden und ihre Relevanz für die Entwicklung der Fachkompetenz: Ein Überblick zum Forschungsstand [Mathematical competences of apprentices and their relevance for the development of vocational expertise: An overview regarding the current state of research]. In A. Heinze & M. Grüßing (Eds.), Mathematiklernen vom Kindergarten bis zum Studium. Kontinuität und Kohärenz als Herausforderung für den Mathematikunterricht (pp. 204–216). Münster: Waxmann.
Nickolaus, R., Gschwendter, T., & Geißel, B. (2008). Modellierung und Entwicklung beruflicher Fachkompetenz in der gewerblich-technischen Erstausbildung [Assessing vocational expertise and its development over commercial-technical initial trainings]. Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 104, 48–73.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge; an essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosendahl, J., & Straka, G. A. (2011). Kompetenzmodellierungen zur wirtschaftlichen Fachkompetenz angehender Bankkaufleute [Modeling commercial expertise of beginning bankers]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 107, 190–217.
Schmidt, J. U. (2000). Prüfungen auf dem Prüfstand: Betriebe beurteilen die Aussagekraft von Prüfungen [Examining final examinations: Firms evaluate the explanatory power of final examinations]. Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 29(5), 27–31.
Seeber, S. (2008). Ansätze zur Modellierung beruflicher Fachkompetenz in kaufmännischen Ausbildungsberufen [Approaches for the modeling of vocational expertise in commercial vocations]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 104, 74–97.
Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Reflections on quantitative reasoning: An assessment perspective. In B. L. Madison & L. A. Steen (Eds.), Calculation vs. context: Quantitative literacy and its implications for teacher education (pp. 27–47). Washington, DC: MAA.
Shavelson, R. J., & Seminara, J. L. (1968). Effect of lunar gravity on man’s performance of basic maintenance tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 177–183.
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007015.
Volpert, W. (1983). Handlungsstrukturanalyse als Beitrag zur Qualifikationsforschung [Analysis of the structure of actions as a contribution to qualification research]. Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein.
Weiß, R. (2011). Prüfungen in der beruflichen Bildung: Ein vernachlässigter Forschungsgegenstand [Examinations in vocational education: A neglected field of research]. In E. Severing & R. Weiß (Eds.), Prüfungen und Zertifizierung in der beruflichen Bildung: Anforderungen–Instrumente–Forschungsbedarf (pp. 37–52). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Winther, E. (2010). Kompetenzmessung in der beruflichen Bildung [Competence measurement in vocational education]. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
Winther, E. (2011). Kompetenzorientierte Assessments in der beruflichen Bildung: Am Beispiel der Ausbildung von Industriekaufleuten [Competence-oriented assessments in vocational education]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 107, 33–54. doi:10.1186/1877-6345-5-2.
Winther, E., & Achtenhagen, F. (2008). Kompetenzstrukturmodell für die kaufmännische Bildung. Adaptierbare Forschungslinien und theoretische Ausgestaltung [A structural competence model for commercial education]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 104, 511–538.
Winther, E., & Achtenhagen, F. (2009). Measurement of vocational competencies—A contribution to an international large-scale assessment on vocational education and training. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1, 88–106.
Winther, E., & Klotz, V. K. (2013). Measurement of vocational competences: An analysis of the structure and reliability of current assessment practices in economic domains. Empirical Research in Vocational Education & Training, 5(2), 1–12. doi:10.1186/1877-6345-5-2.
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this chapter was supported by grant “Competence-oriented assessments in VET and professional development” (Winther, 2009-2014; Wi 3597/1-1; 1-2) from the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the Priority Program “Competence Models for Assessing Individual Learning Outcomes and Evaluating Educational Processes” (SPP 1293).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix
Ceraforma Keramik AG
Since its foundation in 1982, Ceraforma Keramik AG has developed into an expanding and globally active industrial enterprise, having their head office in Aachen, Germany. The company is involved in the production of ceramic goods, such as china and porcelain for tableware and vases or sanitary ware.
In the past, the management of Ceraforma Keramik realized that the four divisions: procurement logistics, production, human resource management as well as marketing and sales, were operating too independently of each other, which caused disturbances in the performance process and led to customer complaints. In response to these problems, so-called horizontal teams were established, consisting of work members from different company divisions.
You have been employed with Ceraforma Keramik in such a horizontal team since the beginning of this year. Here, the allocated customer orders are being handled in all business processes, ranging from the receipt of orders to the settlement of accounts. Ms. Kenk, the team leader, Mr. Friebel and Ms. Hoffmann, the new trainee, are your colleagues in the horizontal team.
Business Process 1
Situation
Your team just received a new customer enquiry. Your colleague, Mr. Friebel, shows you the following e-mail, which arrived on 30 March 20… at 10:17.
-
1.1
Since there have not yet been any business relations with the Bauhannes Ltd. company, you are requested by Mr. Friebel to gather detailed information on the financial standing of the potential customer.
Which two kinds of information would you gather to assess the risk and which two outside sources would you contact?
-
1.4
After repeated negotiations the company Ceraforma accepts the order from the DIY Bauhannes at the price stipulated by Mr. Schwienert. Receipt of confirmation of the order by email is on Friday, 6 April 20... You have been informed that there is no suffient quantity of quartz crystal on stock to execute the order. You are therefore required to order 25 tons of new quartz crystals. You then contact various suppliers by mail and you receive the emails below from Mineral Seifert AG from Aachen, and Tam-Quarz Ltd. from South Africa:
Please compare both offers and give reasons for which offer you would decide. When making your decision you should consider also possible risks and social and ecological issues, besides financial aspects. Also bear in mind that Ceraforma have sufficient liquid funds and that discounts granted can be fully exploited.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klotz, V.K., Winther, E. (2017). Assessing Tomorrow’s Potential: A Competence Measuring Approach in Vocational Education and Training. In: Leutner, D., Fleischer, J., Grünkorn, J., Klieme, E. (eds) Competence Assessment in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50028-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50030-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)