Abstract
This chapter examines popular assemblies during the so-called Era of Good Feelings (1815–1828) in the United States in order to explore how politically active, white, male Americans understood popular sovereignty and sought to put it into practice. All white, male Americans believed that a unitary public with a single will existed and that that will should rule in public life. But such a will did not exist, and Americans never agreed on how, exactly, that fictitious will should rule. In attempting to put this belief into practice, public meetings and the officials who responded to them exposed the ambiguities and contradictions contained in the doctrine of popular sovereignty and articulated several competing visions of how that doctrine ought to be put into practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huston, R. (2017). Can ‘The People’ Speak? Popular Meetings and the Ambiguities of Popular Sovereignty in the United States, 1816–1828. In: te Velde, H., Janse, M. (eds) Organizing Democracy. Palgrave Studies in Political History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50020-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50020-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50019-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50020-1
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)