This chapter briefly looks at the ways that those in the mid-to-late twentieth-century developed lie-detection techniques without neuroimaging – and how various neuroimaging techniques promise more sophisticated types of lie detection. It also very briefly explains how different neuroimaging technologies – such as EEF, fMRI, and fNIR – work, and how they might evolve into more sophisticated – and invasive – techniques in the future, and how law enforcement use of them may thus raise privacy concerns (and do so, even in cases that at first seem free of substantial privacy harms).
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging
- Guilty knowledge
- Lie detection
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Strange Days: Lightstorm Entertainment/20th Century Fox (1995).
Adelstein, J. S., Shehzad, Z., Mennes, M., DeYoung, C. G., Zuo, X.-N., et al. (2011). Personality is Reflected in the Brain’s Intrinsic Functional Architecture. Plos ONE, 6(11), e27633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027633.
Alder, K. (2007). Lie Detectors: The History of an American Obsession. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Allen, R. J., & Mace, K. M. (2004). The Self-Incrimination Clause Explained and Its Future Predicted. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 94, 243–293.
Ayaz, H., et al. (2011). Suite and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Study Learning in Spatial Navigation. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 56, e3443. doi: 10.3791/3443.
Battaglia, M., Ogliari, A., Zanoni, A., Citterio, A., Pozzoli, U., Giorda, R., Maffei, C., & Marino, C. (2005). Influence of the Serotonin Transporter Promoter Gene and Shyness on Children’s Cerebral Responses to Facial Expressions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(1), 85–94.
Brandom, R. (2015, February 12). Is ‘Brain Fingerprinting’ a Breakthrough or a Sham? The Verge. http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/2/7951549/brain-fingerprinting-technology-unproven-courtroom-science-farwell-p300.
Buzsaki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Carmel, D., Dayan, E., Naveh, A., Raveh, O., & Ben Shakhar, G. (2003). Estimating the Validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test From Simulated Experiments: The External Validity of Mock Crime Studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(4), 261–269.
Chadwick, M. J., et al. (2010). Decoding Individual Episodic Memory Traces in the Human Hippocampus. Current Biology, 20(6), 544–547.
Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, National Research Council, The Polygraph and Lie Detection. (2003). The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Cowen, A. S., Chun, M., & Kuhl, B. (2014). Neural Portraits of Perception: Reconstructing Face Images From Evoked Brain Activity. Neuroimage, 94, 12–22.
Farah, M. J., Smith, M. E., Gawuga, C., Lindsell, D., & Foster, D. (2010). Brain Imaging and Brain Privacy: A Realistic Concern? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 119–127.
Farwell, L. (2012). Brain Fingerprinting: A Comprehensive Tutorial Review of Detection of Concealed Information with Event-Related Brain Potential. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 6, 115–154.
Fox, D. (2008). Will Memory Detection Technologies Transform Criminal Justice in the United States? Brain Imaging and the Bill of Rights. American Journal of Biethics, 8(1), 1–4.
Gamer, M., Klimecki, O., Bauermann, T., Stoeter, P., & Vossel, G. (2012). fMRI-Activation Patterns in the Detection of Concealed Information Rely on Memory-Related Effects. SCAN, 7, 506–515.
Hughes, V. (2014, September 30). The Other Polygraph. National Geographic: Phenomena. http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/09/30/the-other-polygraph/.
Jones, O. D., Buckholtz, J. W., Schal, J. D., & Marois, R. (2009). Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed. Stanford Technology Law Reviews, 2009, 1–47.
Langleben, D. D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J. A., Gur, R. C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J. D., & Childress, A. R. (2002). Brain Activity During Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study. NeuroImage, 15, 727–732.
Langleben, D. T., & Moriarty, J. C. (2013, May 1). Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law, and Policy Collide. Psychology Public Policy Law, 19(2), 222–234.
Lee, T. M., Liu, H. L., Tan, L. H., Chan, C. C., Mahankali, S., Feng, C. M., Hou, J., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2002, March). Lie Detection by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 15(3), 157–164.
Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the Detection of Guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(6), 385–388.
Nishimoto, S. et al. (2010). Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies. Current Biology, 21, 1641–1646.
Sahakian, B. J., & Gottwald, J. (2017). Sex, Lies, and Brain Scans: How fMRI Reveals What Really Goes on in our Minds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Seung, S. (2012). Connectome: How the Brain’s Wiring Makes Us Who We Are. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Shen, F. X. (2013). Neuroscience, Mental Privacy and the Law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 36, 653–713.
Shen, F. X. (2016). Neurolegislation: How U.S. Legislators Are Using Brain Science. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29, 495–526.
Shinkareva, S. V. et al. (2008). Using fMRI Brain Activation to Identify Cognitive States Associated with Perception of Tools and Dwellings. Plos ONE, 3(1), e1394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001394.
Smith, K. (2013, October 13). By Scanning People’s Brain Activity, Scientists May Be Able to Decode People’s Thoughts, Their Dreams, Even Their Intentions. Nature, 502, 428–430.
Snead, O. C. (2007). Neuroimaging and the “Complexity” of Capital Punishment. New York University Law Review, 82, 1265–1339.
Spence, S. (2004). A Cognitive Neurobiological Account of Deception: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1755–1762. PMC. Web. 5 Sept. 2016.
Stoller, S. E., & Wolpe, P. R. (2007). Emerging Technologies for Lie Detection and the Fifth Amendment. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 33(2/3), 359–374.
Sur, S., & Sinha, V. K. (2009, Jan–Jun). Event Related Potential: An Overview. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(1), 70–73.
Ward, J. (2010). Student’s Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd edn.). New York: Psychology Press.
Wolpaw, J., & Wolpaw, E. W. (2012). Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Yuhas, D. (2012, June 12). What’s a Voxel and What Can It Tell Us? A Primer on fMR. Scientific American Blog. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/whats-a-voxel-and-what-can-it-tell-us-a-primer-on-fmri/.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blitz, M.J. (2017). Lie Detection, Mind Reading, and Brain Reading. In: Searching Minds by Scanning Brains. Palgrave Studies in Law, Neuroscience, and Human Behavior. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50003-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50004-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)