Adler, M. (1996). Cyberspace, General Searches, and Digital Contraband. Yale Law Journal, 105, 1093–1120.
Bard, J. S. (2016). Ah, Yes: I Remember It Well: Why the Inherent Unreliability of Human Memory Makes Brain Imaging Technology a Measure of Truth-Telling in the Courtroom. Oregon Law Review, 94, 295–358.
Blitz, M. J. (2005). The Dangers of Fighting Terrorism with Technocommunitarianism. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 32, 677–719.
Blitz, M. J. (2010). Freedom of Thought for the Extended Mind. Wisconsin Law Review, 2010, 1049–1117.
Blitz, M. J. (2016). A Right to Thought Enhancing Technology. In Jotterard, Fabrice & Dubljevic, Veljko (Ed.), Cognitive Enhancement: Ethical and Policy Implications in International Perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Boire, R. G. (2000, Summer). On Cognitive Liberty, Pt. II. Journal of Cognitive Liberty, 2(1), 7–20.
Boire, R. G. (2005). Neurocops: The Politics of Prohibition and the Future of Enforcing Social Policy from Inside the Body. Journal of Law and Health, 19, 215–257.
Brennan-Marquez, K. (2012–13). A Modest Defense of Mind-Reading. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 15, 214–272.
Brown, T., & Murphy, E. (2010). Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant’s Past Mental States. Stanford Law Review, 62(1119), 1138–1139.
Carter, R. (2015, September 25). Neurotelepathy: The Rise of Mind-Reading Machines, Science Focus. http://www.sciencefocus.com/feature/mind-reading/neurotelepathy-rise-mind-reading-machines.
Clark, A., & Chalmers David, J. (2008). The Extended Mind. In A. Clark (Ed.), Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and the Cognitive Experience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J. (1996). A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at “Copyright Management” in Cyberspace. Connecticut Law Review, 28, 981–1039.
Federspiel, W. (2008). 1984 Arrives: Thought(Crime), Technology, and the Constitution. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 16, 865–900.
Fox, D. (2009). The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control. Akron Law Review, 42, 763.
Holley, P. (2016, June 5). Their Son Was Killed. They Believe His Parrot Is Telling People Who Pulled the Trigger. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/06/05/their-son-was-killed-they-believe-his-parrot-is-telling-people-who-pulled-the-trigger/?utm_term=.84d253de0f9f
Kolber, A. (2008). Freedom of memory today. Neuroethics, 1, 145–148.
Kolber, A. J. (2016). Two Views of First Amendment Thought Privacy, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2010, 1381–1423.
LaFave, W. R. (1996). Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN: Thomson West.
Levy, N. (2007). Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loewy, A. H. (1983). The Fourth Amendment as a Device for Protecting the Innocent. Michigan Law Review, 81, 1229–1272.
Loftus, E., & Ketchum, K. (1994). The Myth of Repressed Memory: False Memories and Allegations of Sexual Abuse. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Moriarty, J. C. (2009). Visions of Deception: Neuroimages and the Search for Truth. Akron Law Review, 42, 739–760.
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, LXXXIII(4), 435–450.
New, J. G. (2008). If You Could Read My Mind. Journal of Legal Medicine, 29, 179–198.
Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. New York: New American Library.
Pardo, M. S., & Patterson, D. (2013). Minds, Brains and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
PBS NewsHour. (2016, June 28). Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, Who Beat Back Legal Challenges to Obamacare, Steps Down. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/solicitor-general-donald-verrilli-who-beat-back-legal-challenges-to-obamacare-steps-down/.
Richards, N. (2008). Intellectual Privacy. Texas Law Review, 87, 387–445.
Richards, N. (2015). Intellectual Privacy: Challenges for the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sahakian, B. J., & Gottwald, J. (2017). Sex, Lies, and Brain Scans: How fMRI Reveals What Really Goes on in our Minds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schauer, Frederick. (2010). Can Bad Science Be Good Evidence? Neuroscience, Lie Detection, and Beyond. Cornell Law Review, 95, 1191–1219.
Scherr, A. E. (2013). Genetic Privacy & The Fourth Amendment: Unregulated Surreptitious DNA Harvesting. Georgia Law Review, 47, 445–526.
Shen, F. X. (2013). Neuroscience, Mental Privacy and the Law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 36, 653–713.
Solove, D. J. (2007). First Amendment as Criminal Procedure. New York University Law Reviews, 82, 112–176.
Tovino, S. A. (2007). Functional Neuroimaging Information: A Case of Neuroexceptionalism. Florida State University Law Review, 33, 415–489.
Tribe, L. H. (1988). American Constitutional Law (2nd edn.; 1321–1326). St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press.
Wagner A., et al. (2016). fMRI and Lie Detection: A Knowledge Brief of the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Law and Neuroscience. http://www.lawneuro.org/LieDetect.pdf
Winick, B. J. (1989). The Right to Refuse Mental Health Treatment: A First Amendment Perspective. University of Miami Law Review, 44, 1–103.