Skip to main content

Cost Model for Assessing Losses to Avionics Suppliers During Warranty Period

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Through-life Engineering Services

Part of the book series: Decision Engineering ((DECENGIN))

  • 1298 Accesses

Abstract

Reduction of warranty maintenance costs is a critical issue to the manufacturers of avionic products. A method to reduce expected warranty costs is the determination of all components of financial losses to avionic product suppliers during the warranty period with further minimisation of these losses. This study interlinks the warranty, reliability and maintenance indicators of avionic products. Mathematical models are proposed for analysing and assessing financial costs to avionic system suppliers during the warranty period. The developed mathematical models consider the warranty period, reliability indicators with respect to permanent and intermittent failures, redundancy, number of spare parts, cost of restoration and transportation and penalties for exceeding the duration of warranty repair or replacement. Numerical examples illustrating the proposed models are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aerospace warranty report. http://www.warrantyweek.com/archive/ww20160414.html Accessed: 14 April 2016

  2. Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (1996) Product warranty handbook. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas MU, Rao SS (1999) Warranty economic decision models: a summary and some suggested directions for future research. Oper Res 47(6):807–820

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chukova S, Hayakawa Y (2004) Warranty cost analysis: renewing warranty with non-zero repair time. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 11(2):93–112

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jun B, Hoang P (2004) Discounted warranty cost of minimally repaired series systems. IEEE Trans Reliab 53(1):37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang HZ, Liu ZJ, Li Y et al (2008) A warranty cost model with intermittent and heterogeneous usage. Maintenance Reliab 4:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang H (2006) Warranty cost models considering imperfect repair and preventive maintenance. IEEE Bell Labs Tech J 11(3):147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park M (2010) Warranty cost analyses using quasi-renewal processes for multicomponent systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40(6):1329–1340

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Blischke WR, Karim MR, Murthy DNP (2011) Warranty data collection and analysis. Springer series in reliability engineering

    Google Scholar 

  10. Diaz VG, Campos ML, Fernandez JFG (2010) Warranty cost models state-of-art: a practical review to the framework of warranty cost management. In: Bris R, Soares G, Martorell R (eds) Reliability risk and safety: theory and applications, pp 2051–2059

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shafiee M, Chukova S (2013) Maintenance models in warranty: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 229(3):561–572

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Bieber P, Boniol F, Boyer M et al (2012) New challenges for future avionic architectures. Aerosp Lab J 4:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y, Song B (2008) Manpower management benefits predictor method for aircraft two level maintenance concept. Modern Appl Sci 2(4):33–37

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Security and International Affairs Division (1996) Two level maintenance program assessment, United States general accounting office. AD-A307070

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raza A, Ulansky V (2015) Minimizing total lifecycle expected costs of digital avionics’ maintenance. In: Proceedings of 4th international through-life engineering services conference, Cranfield, Nov 2015. Procedia CIRP, vol 38, pp 118–123

    Google Scholar 

  16. Drenick RF (1960) The failure law of complex equipment. J Soc Ind Appl Math 8(4):680–690

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Salemi S, Yang L, Dai J et al (2008) Physics-of-failure based handbook of microelectronic systems. University of Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qin J, Huang B, Walter J et al (2005) Reliability analysis in the commercial aerospace industry. J Reliab Anal Center Dep Def USA 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raza A, Ulansky V (2016) Assessing the impact of intermittent failures on the cost of digital avionics’ maintenance. In: Proceedings of IEEE aerospace conference, Big Sky, Montana, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Ulansky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raza, A., Ulansky, V. (2017). Cost Model for Assessing Losses to Avionics Suppliers During Warranty Period. In: Redding, L., Roy, R., Shaw, A. (eds) Advances in Through-life Engineering Services. Decision Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49938-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49938-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49937-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49938-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics