Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 910 Accesses

Abstract

Proper recognition and management of apical prolapse is imperative in maximizing surgical outcomes in women with multi-compartment pelvic organ prolapse. Sacrospinous ligament fixation is a safe and effective, transvaginal and extraperitoneal procedure for apical prolapse. However, the sacrospinous ligament is an anatomically vulnerable location, which lends technical complexity to the procedure along with risk of rare but important complications. This chapter will serve as a guide for the recognition and management of complications of sacrospinous ligament fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shah AK, Kohli N, Rajan SS, Hoyte L. The age distribution, rates and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:421–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maher CF, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD004014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, Inthout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomized, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barber MB, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1023–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sze E, Karram MM. Transvaginal repair of vault prolapse: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(3):467–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pollak JT, Takacs P, Medina C. Complications of three sacrospinous ligament fixation techniques. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;99:18–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leone RMU, Alessandri F, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Vaginal sacropinous colpopexy using capio suture-capturing device versus traditional technique: feasibility and outcome. Arch Obstet Gynecol. 2013;287(2):267–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lantzsch TG, Goepel C, Wolters M, Koelbl H. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001;265:21–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, Maher C, Jelovsek JE. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:367–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maher CM, Murray CJ, Carey MP, Dwyer PL, Ugoni AM. Iliococcygeus or sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(1):40–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hefni MA, El-Toukhy TA. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127:257–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz VH, Huisman M, de Jong JM, Heintz PM, van der Vaart CH. Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;19:747–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lovatsis DD, Drutz HP. Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;13:308–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roshanravan SW, Wieslander CK, Schaffer JI, Marlene MM. Neurovascular anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament region in female cadavers: implication in sacrospinous ligament fixation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(6):600.e1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wallner C. Buttock pain after sacrospinous hysteropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1729–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lazarou GG, Grigorescu BA, Olson TR, Powers K, Mikhail MS. Anatomic variations of the pelvic floor nerves adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: a female cadaver study. Int J Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(5):649–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elodi Dielubanza M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dielubanza, E., Pizarro-Berdichevsky, J. (2017). Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension. In: Goldman, H. (eds) Complications of Female Incontinence and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49855-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49855-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49854-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49855-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics