Credit Derivatives and Counterparty Credit Risk

  • Jiří Witzany


Financial derivatives are generally contracts whose financial payoffs depend on the prices of certain underlying assets. The contracts are traded Over the Counter (OTC), or in a standardized form on organized exchanges. The most popular derivative types are forwards, futures, options, and swaps. The underlying assets are, typically, interest rate instruments, stocks, foreign currencies, or commodities. The reasons for entering into a derivative contract might be hedging, speculation, or arbitrage. Compared to on-balance sheet instruments, derivatives allow investors and other market participants to hedge their existing positions, or to enter into new exposures with no, or very low, initial investment. This is an advantage in the case of hedging, but at the same time, in the case of a speculation, a danger, since large risks could be taken too easily. Derivatives are sometimes compared to electricity; something that is very useful if properly used, but extremely dangerous if used irresponsibly. In spite of those warnings, the derivatives market has grown tremendously in recent decades, with OTC outstanding notional amounts exceeding 650 trillion USD, as of the end of 2014, and exchange traded derivatives’ annual turnover exceeding 1450 trillion USD in 2014.


  1. Baran, J. (2016). Post-crisis valuation of derivatives. Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Finance and Accounting, University of Economics in Prague, p. 84.Google Scholar
  2. Baran, J., & Witzany, J. (2013). Konstrukce výnosových křivek v pokrizovém období. In J. Málek (Ed.), Risk management 2012 (pp. 69–100). Praha: Oeconomica.Google Scholar
  3. BCBS. (2006a, June). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. A Revised Framework Comprehensive Version.Google Scholar
  4. BCBS. (2009a, July). Enhancements to the basel II framework BCBS.Google Scholar
  5. BCBS. (2010, December). Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems.Google Scholar
  6. Brigo, D., & Pallavicini, A. (2008). Counterparty risk and contingent CDS valuation under correlation between interest-rates and default (SSRN Working Paper). p. 19. Retrieved from SSRN:
  7. Brigo, D., Pallavicini, A., & Torresetti R. (2006a). The dynamical generalized-poisson loss model, part one. Introduction and CDO calibration. Short version to appear in Risk Magazine. Retrieved from
  8. Brigo, D., Pallavicini, A., & Torresetti, R. (2006b). The dynamical generalized-poisson loss model, part two. Calibration stability and spread dynamics extensions. Short version to appear in Risk Magazine. Retrieved from
  9. Brigo, D., Pallavicini, A., & Torresetti, R. (2010). Credit models and the crisis: A journey into CDOs, copulas, correlations and dynamic models (p. 143). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Cantor, R., Hamilton, D. T., Ou, S., & Varma, P. (2005). Default and recovery rates of corporate bond issuers, 1920–2004. Moody’s Investor Service, Special Comment, Global Credit Research.Google Scholar
  11. Černý, J., & Witzany, J. (2015). Interest rate swap credit valuation adjustment. The Journal of Derivatives, 23(2), 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherubini, U., Luciano, E., & Vecchiato, W. (2004). Copula methods in finance (Willey Finance, p. 293). Hoboken, NJ: Willey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, J. C., Ingersoll, J., & Ross, S. (1985). A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica, 53, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crépey, S., Bielecki, T. R., & Brigo, D. (2014). Counterparty risk and funding: A tale of two puzzles. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Duffie, D., & Singleton, K. J. (2003). Credit risk—Pricing, measurement, and management (p. 396). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fong, H. G. (Ed.). (2006). The credit market handbook—Advanced modeling issues (Wiley Finance, p. 233). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Gapko, P., & Smid, M. (2012). Dynamic multi-factor credit risk model with fat-tailed factors. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 62(2), 125–140.Google Scholar
  18. Gregory, J. (2010). Counterparty credit risk (p. 424). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Gregory, J. (2015). The XVA challenge: Counterparty credit risk, funding, collateral, and capital. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heath, D., Jarrow, R., & Morton, A. (1992). Bond pricing and the term structure of interest rates: A new methodology for contingent claims valuation. Econometrica, 60, 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hull, J. C. (2009). Options, futures, and other derivatives (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Hull, J. C., & White, A. D. (2004). Valuation of a CDO and an n-th to default CDS without Monte Carlo simulation. The Journal of Derivatives, 12(2), 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hull, J. C., & White, A. (2006). Valuing credit derivatives using an implied copula approach. Journal of Derivatives, 14, 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hull, J., & White, A. (2012a). LIBOR vs. OIS: The derivatives discounting dilemma. Journal of Investment Management, 11(3), 14–27.Google Scholar
  25. Hull, J., & White, A. (2012b). The FVA debate. Risk, 25, 83.Google Scholar
  26. Hull, J., & White, A. (2012c, October). The FVA debate continued. Risk Magazine, 52.Google Scholar
  27. Hull, J., & White, A. (2014). Valuing derivatives: Funding value adjustments and fair value. Financial Analysts Journal, 70(3), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ISDA. (2015). ISDA margin survey 2015. International Swaps and Derivatives Association.
  29. Kolman, M. (2013, August 31). Selected one-factor methods to price synthetic CDOs (VŠE Working Paper). p. 32.Google Scholar
  30. Kolman, M. (2014). A one-factor copula-based model for credit portfolios. The Journal of Risk, 17(2), 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lando, D. (1988). Cox process and credit-risky securities. Review of Derivatives Research, 2, 99–120.Google Scholar
  32. Lando, D. (2005). Credit risk modeling—Theory and applications (p. 310). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Li David, X. (1999). On default correlation: A copula approach. Retrieved from SSRN 187289.Google Scholar
  34. Nelsen, R. B. (1999). An introduction to copulas (Lecture notes in statistics 2nd ed., p. 269). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pykhtin, M. (2012). Model foundations of the Basel III standardised CVA charge. Risk, 25(7), 60–66.Google Scholar
  36. Sklar, A. (1959). Fonctions de repartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de L’Université de Paris, 8, 229–231.Google Scholar
  37. Torresetti, R., Brigo, D., & Pallavicini, A. (2006). Implied correlation in CDO tranches: A paradigm to be handled with care. Retrieved from SSRN 946755.Google Scholar
  38. Vasicek, O. A. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vrins, F. D. (2009). Double t copula pricing of structured credit products: Practical aspects of a trustworthy implementation. Journal of Credit Risk, 3, 95–109.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, M. (2006). CDO models—towards the next generation: Incomplete markets and term structure (Working Paper). Retrieved from
  41. Witzany, J. (2013a). Financial derivatives, valuation, hedging and risk management (p. 374). Prague: Oeconomica.Google Scholar
  42. Witzany, J. (2013b). A Note on the vasicek’s model with the logistic distribution. Ekonomický časopis, 10, 1053–1066.Google Scholar
  43. Zhou, C. (2001). The term structure of credit spreads with jump risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 2015–2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiří Witzany
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Finance and AccountingUniversity of Economics in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations