Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Patriarchy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patriarchal Theory Reconsidered

Abstract

In this chapter, the author explores different definitions of patriarchy and their limitations. These different definitions allow to explore and contest different theories and scholars in patriarchal theory. Following the exploration of every definition discussed, a new definition has been introduced, namely compound patriarchy. The universality of patriarchy has been discussed and argued that subordination is universal but exists in different forms. Particularities of patriarchy have been discussed as a platform to demonstrate nuanced concepts of patriarchy, which include compound, vertical, horizontal, structural, and collective patriarchies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By expressing my intention to discuss my limitations, I particularly refer to the extensive literature on the topic and possible shortcomings of relevant scholars who have examined the concepts of patriarchy and gendered violence.

Bibliography

  • Ahmed, L. (1992), Women and Gender in Islam, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ali, N. (2005), “Reconstructing Gender: Iraqi Women Between Dictatorships, War, Sanctions and Occupation”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 739–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, V. (1999), “Patriarchy: A Concept too Useful to Lose”, Contemporary Politics, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, V. (2003), Feminist Political Theory, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrad, M. (2001), States and Women’s Rights, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinar, A. (2008), “Subversion and Subjugation in the Public Sphere: Secularism and The Islamic Headscarf”, Signs, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 891–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1995), Masculinities, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, R. (1960), “Where is the Middle East”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 665–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R., and Dobash, E. (2004), “Women’s Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships Working on a Puzzle”, British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 44, pp. 324–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. (2000), Feminist Theory, London: Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Z. (ed) (1979), Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. (1999), “Patriarchy”, Women’s Studies Encyclopedia, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geetha, V. (2007), Patriarchy, Calcutta: STREE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. (1979), Male Dominance, London: Sphere Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, N. (1996), “Domestic Violence and the Theoretical Discourse of Freedom”, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 126–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holvino, E. (2010), “Intersections: The Simultaneity of Race, Gender and Class in Organization Studies”, Gender, Work and Organisation, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 248–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humm, M. (1989), The Dictionary of Feminist Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunnicutt, G. (2009), “Varieties of Patriarchy and Violence Against Women”, Violence Against Women, Vol. 15, No. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismael, S., and Ismael, J. (2000), “Gender and State in Iraq” in (ed) S. Joseph Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East, New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. (1993), “Connectivity and Patriarchy Among Urban Working Class Arab Families in Lebanon”, Ethos, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 452–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. (1994), “Brother /Sister Relationships: Connectivity, Love and Power in the Reproduction of Patriarchy in Lebanon”, American Ethnologist, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 50–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. (1997), “The Public/Private Imagined Boundary in the Imagined Nation/State/Community”, Feminist Review, No. 57, pp. 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. and Slyomovics (2001), Woman and Power in the Middle East, Slyomovics, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988), “Bargaining With Patriarchy”, Gender and Society, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (2000b), “Foreword” in (ed) S. Joseph Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East, New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, N. (2007), Women in the Middle East, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, B. (2010), “Radical Feminism” in (eds) S. McCann and S. Kim Feminist Theory Reader, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafta, R., Al-Saffar, A., Elisa, S., and Al-Nuaimi, M. (2008), “Gender Based Violence: A Study of Iraqi Woman”, Interpersonal Social Science Journal, Vol. 59, No. 192, pp. 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, P. (2000), “Bargaining With Patriarchy: Taiwanese Women Hiring Migrant Domestic Workers”, Anthropology of Work Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1986), The Creation of Patriarchy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. (2009), “Celebrating Intersectionality? Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies: Themes From a Conference”, European Journal of Women’s Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2001), “Feminist Theory, Embodiment and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival”, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 202–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, A., and Beitler, R. (2010), Women’s Role in the Middle East and North Africa, California: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet, K. (1977), Sexual Politics, London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. (1974), Psychoanalysis and Feminism, New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. (2004), “Patriarchy in Transition: Women and the Changing Family in the Middle East”, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey, S. (2003), “Patriarchy on Trial: Suicide, Discipline and Governance in Imperial Russia”, The Journal of Modern History, March, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 23–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (2008), “Rethinking Intersectionality”, Feminist Review, Issue 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onal, A. (2008), Honor Killing, London: Saqi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parla, A. (2001), “Honor of the State: Virginity Examinations in Turkey”, Feminist Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole. (1988), The Sexual Contract, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salman, M., Kazi, M., Yuval-Davis, N., Al-Hamdeni, C., Batman, S., and Lerman, D. (1987), Women in the Middle East, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, P. (2004), Development practice and Violence Against Women, in (ed) Caroline Sweetman, Oxfam: Oxfam GB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharabi, Hisham. (1988), Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in Arab Society, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umberson, D., Anderson, K., Glick, J., and Shapiro, A. (1998), “Domestic Violence, Personal Growth and Gender”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 442–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, Sylvia. (1990), Theorising Patriarchy, London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelehan, I. (1995), Modern Feminist Thought, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2005), “The Paradox of New Islamic Women in Turkey” in (eds) I. Okkenhaug and I. Flaskerud Gender and Religion and Change in the Middle East, Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2000), Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, S., and Kulczycki, A. (2011), “Honor Killings in Middle East and North Africa: A Systematic Review of the Literature”, Violence Against Women, Vol. 17, No. 11, pp. 1442–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis (1997), Gender and Nation, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahedi, A. (2011), “Muslim American Women in the Post 11-September Era: Challenges and Opportunities”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom

    Filiz Akgul

Authors
  1. Filiz Akgul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akgul, F. (2017). Understanding Patriarchy. In: Patriarchal Theory Reconsidered. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49766-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation