Ideological Materiality at Work: A Lacanian Approach

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 489)

Abstract

While recent theoretical debates have foregrounded sociomaterial studies and the interpenetration between the social and the material, practice-based studies have neglected, if not omitted, the place of affect and ideology in work practice. The use of the notion of materiality causes a conflation of different ontological claims, and a conceptual clarification is needed to grasp the polysemy of materiality. This paper provides some key notions for those interested in addressing the materiality of the affective register at work. By drawing on authors such as Lacan, Althusser, Butler and the Essex Lacanian School, this paper suggests that much is to be gained by addressing two difficult but crucial notions: the materiality of the signifier and ideological fantasy.

Keywords

Materiality Ideology 

References

  1. 1.
    Walsham, G.: The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(4), 376–394 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chua, W.F.: Radical developments in accounting thought. Account. Rev. 61, 601–632 (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvesson, M., Willmott, H.: On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Acad. Manag. Rev. 17(3), 432–464 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nayak, A.: On the way to theory: a processual approach. Organ. Stud. 29(2), 173–190 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alvesson, M., Karreman, D.: Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Hum. Relat. 53(9), 1125–1149 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ashcraft, K.L., Kuhn, T.R., Cooren, F.: Constitutional amendments: materializing organizational communication. Acad. Manag. Ann. 3(1), 1–64 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dreyfus, H., Rabinow, P.: Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Latour, B.: We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Manag. Ann. 4, 1–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Callon, M.: The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A. (eds.) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Macmillan, London (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein, H.K., Kleinman, D.L.: The social construction of technology: structural considerations. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 27(1), 28–52 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Latour, B.: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinch, T.J., Bijker, W.E.: The social construction of facts and artifacts or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(3), 399–441 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 398–427 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeSanctis, G., Poole, S.M.: Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptative structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2), 121–147 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones, M., Karsten, H.: Giddens’ structuration theory and information systems research. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 32(1), 127–157 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2, 433–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9), 1435–1448 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nicolini, D.: Practice Theory, Work and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., Fujimoto, M.: Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in use. Organ. Sci. 6(4), 423–444 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones, M.: Untangling sociomateriality. In: Carlile, P.R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H. (eds.) How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies, 197–226. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rich, K., Rumens, N., Tyler, M.: Un/doing chrononormativity: negotiating ageing, gender and sexuality in organizational life. Organ. Stud. 35(11), 1677–1698 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burkitt, I.: Bodies of Thoughts: Embodiment, Identity & Modernity. Sage, London (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones, M.: A matter of life and death: exploring conceptualizations of sociomateriality in the context of critical care. MIS Q. 38(3), 895–925 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K., Von Sabigny, E.: The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Routledge, London (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reckwitz, A.: Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5(2), 243–263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rheinberger, R.-H.: A reply to David Bloor: “toward a sociology of epistemic things”. Perspect. Sci. 13(3), 406–410 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Knorr Cetina, K.: Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory Cult. Soc. 14(4), 1–30 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Knorr Cetina, K.: Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., Swan, J.: Understanding the role of objects in multidisciplinary collaboration. Organ. Sci. 23, 612–629 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cooren, F.: Communication theory at the center: ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. J. Commun. 62(1), 1–20 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Contu, A., Willmott, H.: Re-embedding situatedness: the importance of power relations in learning theory. Organ. Sci. 14(3), 283–297 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nicolini, D.: Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine. Organ. Sci. 22(3), 602–620 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Laclau, E., Mouffe, C.: Post-marxism without apologies. New Left Rev. 166, 79–106 (1987)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pickering, A.: The Mangle of Practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Braverman, H.: Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Ventury. Monthly Labor Review Press, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Barley, S.: Technology and institutions: what can research in information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Q. 25(2), 145–165 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Althusser, L.: On Ideology. Verso, London (1971)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Marx, K.: Grundrisse. Trans. Martin Nicolaus. Vintage, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Laclau, E., Mouffe, C.: Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso, London and New York (1985)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thompson, M., Willmott, H.: The social potency of affect: identification and power in the immanent structuring of practice. Hum. Relat. 69(2), 483–506 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Laclau, E.: Discourse. In: Goodin, R.E., Pettit, P. (eds.) A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, pp. 431–437. Blackwell, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hardy, C., Thomas, R.: Discourse in a material world. J. Manag. Stud. 52(5), 680–696 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Clough, P.T.: The affective turn: political economy, biomedia and bodies. Theory Cult. Soc. 25(1), 1–22 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lacan, J.: The Seminar, L’Identification, Book IX. Unpublished (1961)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pluth, E.: Signifiers and Acts: Freedom in Lacan’s Theory of the Subject. SUNY Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Butler, J.: Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. Routledge, London and New York (1997)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Butler, J.: Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. Routledge, London and New York (1993)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lacan, J., Fink, B.: Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English. W.W. Norton & Co., New York (2006)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Butler, J., Laclau, E., Žižek, S.: Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. Verso, London and New York (2000)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Barley, S.R.: The codes of the dead: the semiotics of funeral work. Urban Life 12(1), 3–31 (1983)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bailey, E.D., Barley, R.S., Leonardi, M.P.: The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1485–1504 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Prasad, P.: Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: a symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Acad. Manag. J. 36(6), 1400–1429 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Negri, P.: Value and affect. Boundary 2 26(2), 77–88 (1999)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fotaki, M., Metcalfe, B.D., Harding, N.: Writing materiality into management and organization studies through and with Luce irigaray. Hum. Relat. 67(10), 1239–1263 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Leclerq-Vandelannoitte, A.: Organizations as discursive constructions: a Foucauldian approach. Organization Studies 32, 1247–1271 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Robichaud, D., Cooren, F.: Organization and Organizing: Materiality, Agency and Discourse. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Laclau, E.: Glimpsing the future: a reply. In: Critchley, S., Marchart, O. (eds.) Laclau: A Critical Reader, pp. 279–328. Routledge, Abingdon and New York (2004)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chia, R.: Organizational Analysis as a Deconstructive Practice. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Laclau, E.: New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. Verso, London and New York (1990)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Glynos, J.: The grip of ideology: a Lacanian approach to the theory of ideology. J. Polit. Ideol. 6(2), 191–214 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Burawoy, M.: Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1979)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Althusser, L.: Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New Left Books, London (1971)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ekman, S.: Fantasies about work as limitless potential: how managers and employees seduce each other through dynamics of mutual recognition. Hum. Relat. 66(9), 1159–1181 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Cederström, C., Grassman, R.: The masochistic reflexive turn. Ephemera 8(1), 41–57 (2008)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kenny, K.: Someone big and important: identification and affect in an international development organization. Organ. Stud. 33(9), 1175–1193 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sköld, D.: An evil king “thing”, rising, falling and multiplying in trucker culture. Organization 16(2), 249–266 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sköld, D.: The other side of enjoyment: short-circuiting marketing and creativity in the experience economy. Organization 17(3), 363–378 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Glynos, J.: Ideological fantasy at work. Subjectivity 13(3), 275–296 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Warwick Business SchoolCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations