Enactment or Performance? A Non-dualist Reading of Goffman

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 489)

Abstract

This paper contributes to the sociomateriality research orientation with a critical examination of two concepts – enactment and performance – that have been associated with the notion of performativity. While a preference for the term enactment has been expressed in influential IS literature, we argue that sociomateriality will benefit from an engagement with the body of research that focuses on Goffman’s notion of performance. We provide a critique of Mol’s reading of Goffman’s notions of “persona” and “mask”. We then show how a careful non-dualist reading of his work reveals his opus as relevant and useful for sociomateriality, because his notion of performance affords locating technology in differing roles within a performance. In doing so, we argue that Goffman’s work, largely overlooked within this stream of research so far, contributes important concepts and terminology for making sociomateriality actionable for IS.

Keywords

Sociomateriality performativity theorizing information systems (IS) performance Goffman enactment hermeneutic reading 

References

  1. 1.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: 10 sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Manage. Ann. 2(1), 433–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suchman, L.A.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Law, J., Urry, J.: Enacting the social. Econ. Soc. 33(3), 390–410 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Law, J., Mol, A.: Notes on materiality and sociality. Sociol. Rev. 43(2), 274–294 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R.D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., Vidgen, R.: The sociomateriality of information systems: current status. Fut. Direct. MIS Q. 38(3), 809–830 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Butler, J.: Bodies that Matter. Routledge, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Callon, M.: What Does it Mean to Say that Economics Is Performative? In: MacKenzie, D.A., Muniesa, F., Siu, L. (eds.) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, pp. 311–357. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pickering, A.: The mangle of practice: agency and emergence in the sociology of science. Am. J. Sociol. 99(3), 559–589 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leonardi, P., Nardi, B., Kallinikos, J. (eds.): Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World. Oxford University Press, Oxord (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mol, A.: The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press, Durham (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books for Doubleday, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barad, K.: Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28(3), 801–831 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schultze, U.: The avatar as sociomaterial entanglement: a performative perspective on identity, agency and world-making in virtual worlds. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Shanghei, China (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagner, E.L., Newell, S., Piccoli, G.: Understanding project survival in an es environment: a sociomaterial practice perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 11(5), 276 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34(1), 10 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barad, K.: Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, Durham (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riemer, K., Johnston, R.B.: Rethinking the Place of the Artefact in IS Using Heidegger’s Analysis of Equipment. Eu. J. Inf. Syst. 23(3), 273–288 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park, R.E.: Race and Culture. Free Press, Michigan (1950)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Durkheim, E.: The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life: A Study in Religious Sociology. Allen and Unwin, London (1915)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Beauvoir, S.: The Second Sex. Cape, London (1953)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jackson, P.J.: Organizational change and virtual teams: strategic and operational integration. Inf. Syst. J. 9(4), 313–332 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pauleen, D.J., Yoong, P.: Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: a facilitator’s perspective. J. Inf. Technol. 16(4), 205–220 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelly, S., Noonan, C.: Anxiety and psychological security in offshoring relationships: the role and development of trust as emotional commitment. J. Inf. Technol. 23(4), 232–248 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dennis, A., Rennecker, J., Hansen, S.: Invisible whispering: restructuring collaborative decision making with instant messaging. Decis. Sci. 41(4), 845–886 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrett, M., Oborn, E., Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J.: Reconfiguring boundary relations: robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Org. Sci. 23(5), 1448–1466 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jonsson, K., Holmström, J., Lyytinen, K.: Turn to the material: remote diagnostics systems and new forms of boundary-spanning. Inf. Organ. 19(4), 233–252 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Introna, L.D., Hayes, N.: On sociomaterial imbrications: what plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters. Inf. Organ. 21(2), 107–122 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alvesson, M., Sköldberg, K.: Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, vol. 2. Sage, London (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Sydney Business SchoolSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations