Surgical Anatomy of Urinary Segments and Operative Surgical Aspects

  • Salvatore Rocca Rossetti
Chapter

Abstract

In the urinary tract the true segments are identifiable in renal lobes, in supernumerary kidneys, and, in theory, in complete or incomplete reno-ureteric duplicity (multiplicity). Those structures correspond to the previously described segment concept: They have proper functional autonomy and proper vascularization and innervation, and their removal, correctly executed, leaves the rest of the apparatus unscathed.

References

  1. 194.
    Culp D. Pyeloplastic thecnique. In: Flocks RH, Culp D, editors. Surgical urology, year book. 2nd ed. Chicago: Medical Publishers; 1963. p. 82.Google Scholar
  2. 195.
    Rocca Rossetti S. Reconstructive operations on the intrarenal collecting system. In: Wickham EA, editor. Intrarenal surgery. Edinburgh, London, Melbourne, New York: Churcill Liveingstone; 1984. p. 268.Google Scholar
  3. 196.
    Collins WE, Rege PR, Scott AC. Hamilton stewart nephroplasty. Can J Surg. 1867;10:53–9. in J.T. Grayhack: The Year Book of Urology, 1967–68Google Scholar
  4. 197.
    Smith PJ. Hamilton syewart nephroplasty. Proc R Soc Med. 1973;65(11):1021–3.Google Scholar
  5. 198.
    Smith PJ, Dunn M, Roberts JB. Nephroplasty in the management of hydronephrosis. Proc Urol Intern. 1979;51(14):245–8.Google Scholar
  6. 199.
    Hamilton Stewart HH. The nephroplasty procedure in the treatment of hydronephrosis. Br J Urol Int. 1957;23(3):277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 200.
    Wiu Z et al. Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic and meta-analisis. Plos one. 2014;Google Scholar
  8. 201.
    Omar M, et al. Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy a systematic review and meta-analisis. Eur Urol. 2012;62(6):1023–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 202.
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Volpe A, Motrie A. Robotic assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: time meta-analisis has not jet arrived. Br J Urol Int. 2013;112(4):E334–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 203.
    Volpe A, et al. Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot. Assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with high surgical complexity. Br J Urol Int. 2014;114(6):903–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 204.
    Gill S, Eisenberg MS, et al. Zero ischemia partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol. 2011;8(1):128–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 205.
    Aron M, Koenig P, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy a matched-pair comparison from a high volume centre. Br J Urol Int. 2008;102(1):86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 206.
    Uberoi J, Disick GS, Munver R. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric jonctionobstruction: update on the current status of robotic. Assisted pyeloplasty. Br J Urol Int. 2009;104(11):1721–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 207.
    Muto G. Comunicazione personale. 2016.Google Scholar
  15. 208.
    Muto G. Comunicazione personale. 2016.Google Scholar
  16. 209.
    Porpiglia F. Comunicazione personale. 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 210.
    Basiri A, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J. 2014;11(6):1932–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Rocca Rossetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Urology DepartmentUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations