Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Study Approaches for Dissemination of Research Results in the Information Society

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 674))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the study of current trends in the quick dissemination of scientific research results based on the application of information society technologies. The paper demonstrates approaches enabling automatic integration of scientific metadata into different information systems. It also demonstrates an optimal solution for the dissemination of interdisciplinary research results published as proceedings of an annual scientific conference. Specific features of metadata dissemination in diverse information systems have been studied. An approach is presented for the optimization and automation of metadata preparation and for their presentation into diverse information systems that do not support automatic metadata exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aguillo, I.F.: Open Science, Metrics 2.0 and their impact at individual level (2015). http://hdl.handle.net/10261/131489

  2. Dhiman, A.K., Sharma, H.: Accessing scholarly information in networked environment through institutional repositories. Pak. J. Inf. Manage. Libr. 9, 97–111 (2008). http://journals.pu.edu.pk/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/viewFile/814/449

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashraf, K., Haneefa, M.: Scholarly use of social media. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud. 63(27), 132–139 (2016). http://op.niscair.res.in/index.php/ALIS/article/view/12451

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bankier, J.G., Gleason, K.: Institutional Repository Software Comparison (2014). http://works.bepress.com/jean_gabriel_bankier/22/

  5. Björk, B.C.: Open access subject repositories: an overview. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65, 698–706 (2014). doi:10.1002/asi.23021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgelman, J.C., Luber, S., von Schomberg, R., Lusoli, W.: Open science: public consultation on Science 2.0: Science in transition. Key results, insights and possible follow up (2015). http://www.science20-conference.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/01_Jean-Claude_Burgelman_-_Open_Science__outcome_of_the_public_consultation_on__Science-20_science_in_transition.pdf

  7. Calderón-Martínez, A., Ruiz-Conde, E.: Leading emerging markets: capturing and diffusing scientific knowledge through research-oriented repositories. Scientometrics 104(3), 907–930 (2015). doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1603-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DeSordi, J.O., Conejero, M.A., Meireles, M.: Bibliometric indicators in the context of regional repositories: proposing the D-index. Scientometrics 107(1), 235–258 (2016). doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1873-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreras-Fernández, T., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Merlo-Vega, J.A.: Open access repositories as channel of publication scientific grey literature. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality - TEEM 2015, pp. 419–426. ACM Press, New York (2015). doi:10.1145/2808580.2808643

  10. Fisher, J.H.: Scholarly publishing re-invented: real costs and real freedoms. J. Electron. Publishing 11(2) (2008). doi:10.3998/3336451.0011.204

  11. Friesike, S., Widenmayer, B., Gassmann, O.: Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry. J Technol. Trans. 40, 581–601 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorraiz, J.: Individual Bibliometric Assessment @ University of Vienna: From Numbers to Multidimensional Profiles. Zenodo (2016). doi:10.5281/zenodo.45402

  13. Griffiths, P.: Maximizing the impact of your publications in an open access environment. In: Presentation on 43rd Biennial Convention (2016). http://hdl.handle.net/10755/603401

  14. Henkel, R., et al.: Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J. Androl. 18(2), 296–309 (2016). doi:10.4103/1008-682X.171582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kartashova, A.A.: Transformation and deformation of scientific knowledge in connection with expansion of scientific approaches and techniques. Rossiyskiy Gumanitarnyi Zhurnal (Russ. Hum. Sci. J.) 5, 347–357 (2015). doi:10.15643/libartrus-2015.5.3. (in Russia)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kousha, K., Thelwall, M.: Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65, 1615–1626 (2014). doi:10.1002/asi.23070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kudim, K.A., Proskudina, G.Y., Reznichenko, V.A.: Comparing the EPrints 3.0 and DSpace 1.4.1 electronic libraries. In: Works of IX All-Russian Scientific Conference: Electronic Libraries: Advanced Techniques & Technologies, Electronic Collections - RCDL2007. Pereyaslavl-Zalesskyi, 15–18 October 2007 (2008). http://dspace.nsu.ru:8080/jspui/bitstream/nsu/143/1/paper_66_v2.pdf (in Russian)

  18. Li, X., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K.: The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC informal scholarly communication. Lib J. Inf. Manage. 67(6), 614–635 (2015). doi:10.1108/AJIM-03-2015-0049

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mas-Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Aguillo, I.F.: Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics 101(1), 337–356 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miguel, S., Tannuride, O., Cabrini, G.: Scientific production on open access: a worldwide bibliometric analysis in the academic and scientific context. Publications 4(1), 1 (2016). doi:10.3390/publications4010001

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laakso, M.: Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics 99(2), 475–494 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mukherjee, A., Stern, S.: Disclosure or secrecy? The dynamics of open science. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 27(3), 449–462 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicholson, S.W., Bennett, T.B.: Dissemination and discovery of diverse data: do libraries promote their unique research data collections? Int. Inf. Libr. Rev. 48(2), 85–93 (2016). doi:10.1080/10572317.2016.1176448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nielsen, M.: Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Nixon, W.: DAEDALUS: Initial Experiences with ePrints and Dspace at the University of Glasgow. Ariadne (37) (2003). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/nixon/

  26. Open Access 2020. http://oa2020.org

  27. Paprinov, S.I.: Development of electronic libraries is the way to the open science. In: Electronic Libraries: Advanced Techniques and Technologies, Electronic Collections: Works of the XI All-Russian Scientific Conference RCDL 2009, pp. 225–234. Karelia Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Science, Petrozavodsk (2009). http://rcdl.ru/doc/2009/225_234_Invited-2.pdf (in Russian)

  28. Parinov, S., Lyapunov, V., Puzyrev, R., Kogalovsky, M.: Semantically enrichable research information system socionet. Knowledge engineering and semantic web. In: 6th International Conference, KESW 2015, Moscow, Russia, September 30 - October 2, 2015, Proceedings. 518 of the series Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 147–157 (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24543-0_11

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parsons, J.: Welcome to Science 2.0|Open Access in Action. Library Journal, March 15 (2016). http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/03/oa/welcome-to-science-2-0-open-access-in-action/

  30. Pinfield, S.: Making open access work: the “state-of-the-art” in providing Open Access to scholarly literature. Online Inf. Rev. 39(5), 604–636 (2015). doi:10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Porter, A.L., Rafols, I.: Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81(3), 719–745 (2009). doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Prokudin, D.E.: Through an open software publishing platform for integration into the global scientific community: addressing rapid publication of research results. Sch. Commun. Rev. 6(18), 13–18 (2013). doi:10.18334/np36109

    Google Scholar 

  33. Qin, J., Lancaster, F.W., Allen, B.: Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 48, 893–916 (1997). doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893:AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jamali, R., Russell, D., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A.: Do online communities support research collaboration? Lib J. Inf. Manag. 66(6), 603–622 (2014). doi:10.1108/ajim-08-2013-0072

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidt, B., Orth, A., Franck, G., Kuchma, I., Knoth, P., Carvalho, J.: Stepping up open science training for European research. Publications 4(2), 16 (2016). doi:10.3390/publications4020016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Siedlok, F., Hibbert, P.: The organization of interdisciplinary research: modes, drivers and barriers. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 16, 194–210 (2014). doi:10.1111/ijmr.12016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, I.: Open access infrastructure. UNESCO, Paris (2015). http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232204e.pdf

  38. Solomon, D.J.: Strategies for developing sustainable open access scholarly journals. First Monday 11(6) (2006). doi:10.5210/fm.v11i6.1335

  39. Strakhovskaya, I.G.: Culturological tools of interdisciplinarity. Vestnik Slavyanslik Kultur (Bull. Slavic Cultures) 4, 35–43 (2011). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Syrov, V.N.: Philosophy and Prospects of Interdisciplinary Researches in Russian Science. Vestnik VolgU (Bulletin of Volgograd University), Series 7, Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies, vol. 3, pp. 5–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: setting the default to open. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-recommendations

  42. Thelwall, M., Kousha, K.: Research gate: disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66, 876–889 (2015). doi:10.1002/asi.23236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Willinsky, J.: Open journal systems: an example of open source software for journal management and publishing. Libr. Hi Tech. 23(4), 504–519 (2005). doi:10.1108/07378830510636300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Dmitry Prokudin, Irina Mbogo, Lyudmila Murgulets & Marina Kudryavtseva

  2. Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

    Dmitry Prokudin, Irina Mbogo & Marina Kudryavtseva

Authors
  1. Dmitry Prokudin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irina Mbogo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lyudmila Murgulets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marina Kudryavtseva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry Prokudin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Andrei V. Chugunov

  2. Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Radomir Bolgov

  3. National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Yury Kabanov

  4. Eotvos University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

    George Kampis

  5. Universität Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany

    Maria Wimmer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Prokudin, D., Mbogo, I., Murgulets, L., Kudryavtseva, M. (2016). The Study Approaches for Dissemination of Research Results in the Information Society. In: Chugunov, A., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 674. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49699-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49700-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation