Abstract
The introduction of the sustainable development concept in the field of cultural heritage preservation has led relevant changes to traditional interventions on historical buildings and areas. Although the idea of reusing cultural heritage is not new, the emerging concept of adaptive reuse stresses even more the importance of a holistic approach for addressing successful interventions. Selecting among the potential uses the one that could ensure the preservation of physical characters as well as intangible values, fueling economic development, is a challenging policy and design issue. In this context, this paper proposes the use of Choice Experiments to support the design of adaptive reuse strategies for three mostly unused castles in Northern Italy characterized by different states of conservation, accessibility and surrounding territorial context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M et al (1998) Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values. Choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 80:64–75
Alvarez-Farizo B, Hanley N (2002) Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain. Energy Policy 30:107–116
Bottero M (2011) Assessing the economic aspects of landscape. In: Cassatella C, Peano A (eds) Landscape indicators. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–192
Bottero M, Ferretti V, Mondini G (2015) Towards an integrated economic assessment of landscape. In: Gambino R, Peano A (eds) Nature Policies and Landscape Policies. Towards an Alliance. Springer, Berlin, pp 371–380
Bravi M, Giaccaria S (2006) La Conjoint Analysis (CA) nelle valutazioni immobiliari. Aestimum 48:39–59
Bullen PA, Love PED (2011) A new future for the past: a model for adaptive reuse decision‐making, Built Environ Project and Asset Manage 1(1):32–44
Bullock CH, Collier M (2011) When the public good conflicts with an apparent preference for unsustainable behavior. Ecol Econ 70:971–977
Colorni A, Tsoukiàs A (2013) What is a decision problem? Preliminary statements. Proceedings of ADT 2013, vol 8176, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 139–153
Dawes RM, Corrigan B (1974) Linea models in decision making. Psycol Bull 81:95–106
Department of Environment and Heritage (DEH) (2004) Adaptive reuse, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Accessed at https://www.environment.gov.au on Mar 2015
Elsorady D (2014) The economic value of heritage properties in Alexandria, Egypt. J Cult Heritage 15:511–521
European Commission’s (2014) Communication “Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe. Accessed at http://ec.europa.eu/culture/library/publications/2014-heritage-communication_en.pdf, Dec 2015
Ferretti V (2016) From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and multi-attribute value theory: an integrated approach for policy support. Eur J Oper Res 253:524–541
Hanley N, MacMillan D, Wright RE et al (1998a) Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland. J Agric Econ 49(1):1–15
Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamowicz V (1998b) Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environ Res Econ 11(3):413–428
Harpman DA (2008) Introduction to conjoint analysis for valuing ecosystem amenities. technical memorandum EC 2008-01. US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation
Johnson FR, Lancsar E, Marshall D et al (2013) Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health 16(1):3–13
Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 2:132–157
Latham D (2000) Creative Reuse of Buildings 1–2, Donhead Publishing Ltd, Shaftesbury, UK
Louviere JJ, Flynn TN, Carson RT (2010) Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis. J Choice Model 3(3):57–72
Mazzanti M (2002) Cultural heritage as multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: toward a new framework for economic analysis and valuation. J Socio-Econ 31:529–558
McFadden D (1974) Conditional Logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142
McFadden D (1986) The choice theory approach to market research. Market Sci 5:275–279
Misirlisoy D, Günce K (2016) Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: a holistic approach. Sustain Cities Soc 26:91–98
Oppio A, Bottero M, Ferretti V (2014) Multicriteria Spatial analysis for competitive cultural heritage in fringe areas: the case of Valle D’aosta castles, advanced engineering forum, new metropolitan perspective. Integr Appr Urban Sustain Dev 11:579–584
Oppio A, Bottero M, Ferretti V, Fratesi U, Ponzini D, Pracchi V (2015) Giving space to multicriteria analysis for complex cultural heritage systems: the case of the castles in Valle D’Aosta Region, Italy. J Cult Heritage 16(6):779–789
Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Plevoets B, Van Cleempoel K (2011) Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: a literature review. WIT Trans Built Environ 118:155–164
Rambonilaza M, Dachary-Bernard J (2007) Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method? Landscape Urban Plan 83:318–326
Sayadi S, Gonzalez Roa MC, Calatrava Requena J (2005) Ranking versus scale rating in conjoint analysis: evaluating landscapes in mountainous regions in southeastern Spain. Ecol Econ 55:539–550
Sayadi S, Gonzàlez-Roa MC, Calatrava-Requena J (2009) Public preferences for landscape features: the case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas. Land Use Policy 26:334–344
Stellin G (1994) Sviluppo sostenibile locale e risorse storico-culturali: strategie e valutazioni, Atti del XXIV Incontro di Studio Ce.S.E.T., 199–223
Tagliaferro C, Longo A, Van Eetvelde V et al (2013) Landscape economic valuation by integrating landscape ecology into landscape economics. Environ Sci Policy 32:26–36
Throsby D (2001) Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vecco M (2010) A definition of cultural heritage: from the tangible to the intangible. J Cult Heritage 11(3):321–324
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Ferretti, V. (2017). Designing Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Cultural Heritage with Choice Experiments. In: Stanghellini, S., Morano, P., Bottero, M., Oppio, A. (eds) Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49675-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49676-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)