Making Sense of Network Dynamics through Network Picturing

  • Tiina Valjakka
  • Valtteri Kaartemo
  • Katri Valkokari


The future structure and paths of development of dynamic business networks are fundamentally unknowable. The managerial challenge is to influence the development within a business network crossing organizational boundaries. Practical tools are needed to map out how actors’ network strategies actually come into being while organizations continuously interact with each other. The described cases explore sense-making processes between the involved network actors and utilize network pictures as a boundary-spanning tool for strategic management. First, network picturing was utilized by a multinational company to identify the needs of actors in its network and to develop their value propositions under various network scenarios. Second, an SME’s (Small and medium-sized enterprise)most important connections were identified with network picturing to enable the company to drive changes in the network. The broader network perspectives depicted were the end users’ network pictures from different customer segments. In both cases, network picturing resulted in the identification of new relevant network actors and the requirements for building connections to them.


Business networks Network pictures 


  1. Ford, D., Gadde, L.-E., Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (2003). Managing business relationships (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  2. Hawkins, M. A., & Rezazade, M. M. H. (2012). Knowledge boundary spanning process: Synthesizing four spanning mechanisms. Management Decision, 50(10), 1800–1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Henneberg, S., Naudé, P., & Mouzas, S. (2009). Sense-making and management in business networks—Some observations, considerations, and a research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jarzabkowski, P., & Seidl, D. (2008). The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, P., & Smets, M. (2013). Material artifacts: Practices for doing strategy with ‘stuff’. European Management Journal, 31(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaartemo, V., Makkonen, H., & Olkkonen, R. (2015). The potential of network pictures for international alliance and network research. In J. Larimo, N. Nummela, & T. Mainela (Eds.), Handbook on international alliance and network research (pp. 229–242). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaplan, S. (2011). Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy-making. Organization Science, 22(2), 320–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koskinen, K. U., & Mäkinen, S. (2009). Role of boundary objects in negotiations of project contracts. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laari-Salmela, S., Mainela, T., & Puhakka, V. (2015). Beyond network pictures: Situational strategizing in network context. Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mattsson, L. G. (2002). Dynamics of markets: How ‘Actor-Network Theory’ and ‘Markets-as-Networks’ can learn from each other. Paper presented at the Nordic Workshop on Interorganizational Studies, Kolding, August 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Miesing, P., & Van Ness, R. K. (2007). Exercise: Scenario planning. Organization Management Journal, 4(2), 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moliterno, T. P., & Mahony, D. M. (2010). Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management, 37(2), 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1108–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramos, C., & Ford, I. D. (2010). Network pictures as a research device: Developing a tool to capture actors’ perceptions in organizational networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(3), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Valkokari, K. (2015). Describing network dynamics in three different business nets. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(2), 219–231. Weick, K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiina Valjakka
    • 1
  • Valtteri Kaartemo
    • 2
  • Katri Valkokari
    • 1
  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Center of FinlandTampereFinland
  2. 2.University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations