Advertisement

Abstract

Single-sensor EEG hardware provides possibilities for researchers to measure fear in human beings. Previous research show that consumer-grade EEG devices can be used to measure different states of mind. However, as is often the case with similar research, post-hoc questionnaires are used to measure the emotional state. This paper will focus on the physiological and psychological state of an individual in fear, comparing continuous subjective feedback with EEG measurements. Data has been collected using a Myndplay Brainband and a rotary meter, while 30 subjects viewed soothing and scary films. The rotary meter proved useful for obtaining continuous feedback and, although more research is needed, differences in brainwaves for fearful and calm states are found for multiple frequency bands.

Keywords

Fear analysis EEG Psychological response Physiological response 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go out to Tibor Bosse and Marco Otte, for providing the necessary support for this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Ax, A.F.: The physiological differentiation between fear and anger in humans. Psychosom. Med. 15, 433–442 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hodges, W., Spielberger, C.: The effects of threat of shock on heart rate for subjects who differ in manifest anxiety and fear of shock. Psychophysiology (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams, L.M., Phillips, M.L., Brammer, M.J., Skerrett, D., Lagopoulos, J., Rennie, C., Bahramali, H., Olivieri, G., David, A.S., Peduto, A., Gordon, E.: Arousal dissociates amygdala and hippocampal fear responses: evidence from simultaneous fMRI and skin conductance recording. NeuroImage 14, 1070–1079 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Figner, B., R.O., M.: Using skin conductance in judgement and decision making research. In: A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research: A Critical Review and User’s Guide, pp. 163–184 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    NeuroSky: Brain Wave Signal (EEG) of NeuroSky, Inc. (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breiter, H.C., Etcoff, N.L., Whalen, P.J., Kennedy, W.A., Rauch, S.L., Buckner, R.L., Strauss, M.M., Hyman, S.E., Rosen, B.R.: Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression. Neuron 17, 875–887 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    LeDoux, J.E.: Emotion circuits in the brain. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 155–184 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahern, G.L., Schwarts, G.E.: Differential lateralization for positive and negative emotion in the human brain: EEG spectral analysis. Neuropsychologia 23, 745–755 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Putman, P., van Peer, J., Maimari, I., van der Werff, S.: EEG theta/beta ratio in relation to fear-modulated response-inhibition, attentional control, and affective traits. Biol. Psychol. 83, 73–78 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choi, H.S., Jones, A., Schwartz, G.: Using brain-computer interfaces to analyze EEG data for safety improvementGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Man, J.: Analysing emotional video using consumer EEG hardware. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8511, pp. 729–738. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2_69 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bosse, T., Gerritsen, C., Man, J., Stam, M.: Inducing anxiety through video material. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2014. CCIS, vol. 434, pp. 301–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07857-1_53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dustman, R.E., Boswell, R.S., Porter, P.B.: Beta brain waves as an index of alertness. Science 137, 533–534 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceVU University Amsterdam,AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations