Abstract
This chapter addresses the misalignment between clinical research and practice. The extent to which clinical research findings can be feasibly implemented in clinical settings is still not completely understood. Practical implementation barriers to the integration of research findings into clinical practice include the constantly expanding body of knowledge, lack of long-term follow-up results, and logistical hurdles. Theoretically, research studies—conducted to draw inferential conclusions about an entire population—are not designed for applicability to individuals. Also, because research trials are frequently designed to study diseases of interest, researchers statistically minimize the influence of individual differences within their samples. This practice directly contrasts that of physicians, who must consider individual patient characteristics before recommending a course of treatment. As such, research is not an obvious theoretical fit with the patient-centered care model. Evidence-based practice is said to bridge the research–practice gap. Clinicians who use evidence-based practice maintain a working knowledge of current research findings and incorporate findings into clinical decision-making according to the patient’s needs, values, and clinical presentation. This chapter provides concrete communication strategies for physicians who use evidence-based practice to discuss research findings with their patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kazdin AE. Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. Am Psychol. 2008;63(3):146.
Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Schultz A. Transforming health care from the inside out: advancing evidence-based practice in the 21st century. J Prof Nurs. 2005;21(6):335–44.
Cochrane.org. About us | Cochrane. http://www.cochrane.org/about-us (2016). Accessed 15 January 2016.
Bouffard M, Reid G. The good, the bad, and the ugly of evidence-based practice. Adap Phys Act Quart. 2012;29(1):1–24.
Bensing J. Bridging the gap.: the separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(1):17–25.
Maaskant JM, Knops AM, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H. Evidence-based practice: a survey among pediatric nurses and pediatricians. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28(2):150–7.
Larson EB. How can clinicians incorporate research advances into practice? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(s2):20–4.
Mariani AW, Pêgo-Fernandes PM. Statistical significance and clinical significance. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(2):71–2.
Cioffi J. Heuristics, servants to intuition, in clinical decision-making. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26:203–8.
McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1):24–8.
Teas Gill V. Patient “demand” for medical interventions: exerting pressure for an offer in a primary care clinic visit. Res Lang Soc Inter. 2005;38(4):451–79.
Siminoff LA. Incorporating patient and family preferences into evidence-based medicine. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(Suppl 3):S6.
Kleinman A. The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition. Basic books; 1988.
Fox N, Ward K, O’Rourke A. Pro-anorexia, weight-loss drugs and the Internet: an ‘anti-recovery’explanatory model of anorexia. Sociol Health Illn. 2005;27(7):944–71.
Kandula N. The patient explanatory mode. The Health Care Blog. http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2013/06/opinion-health-blog-kandula-.html (2013). Accessed 8 Jan 2016.
Kleinman A, Benson P. Anthropology in the clinic: the problem of cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e294.
Bright Futures/American Academy of Pediatrics [Internet]. [Place unknown]: Recommendations for preventative pediatric health care; 2016. https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/PeriodicitySchedule2015_Visionscreening.pdf.
Tanner JL, Stein MT, Olson LM, Frintner MP, Radecki L. Reflections on well-child care practice: a national study of pediatric clinicians. Pediatrics. 2009;124(3):849–57.
Nlm.nih.gov. Complementary and Integrative Medicine: MedlinePlus. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/complementaryandintegrativemedicine.html#summary (2016). Accessed 16 January 2016.
NCCIH. | NCCIH. https://nccih.nih.gov/health/acupuncture/introduction#hed3 (2008). Accessed 18 January 2016.
Mayoclinic.org. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) Evidence—Mayo Clinic. http://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/vitamin-c/evidence/hrb-20060322 (2016). Accessed 18 January 2016.
Mayoclinic.org. Autism treatment: Can chelation therapy help?—Mayo Clinic. http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/expert-answers/autism-treatment/faq-20057933 (2016). Accessed 18 January 2016.
Harrington JW, Rosen L, Garnecho A, Patrick PA. Parental perceptions and use of complementary and alternative medicine practices for children with autistic spectrum disorders in private practice. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006;27(2):S156–61.
Wald HS, Dube CE, Anthony DC. Untangling the Web—The impact of Internet use on health care and the physician–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(3):218–24.
Opel DJ, Heritage J, Taylor JA, Mangione-Smith R, Salas HS, DeVere V, Zhou C, Robinson JD. The architecture of provider-parent vaccine discussions at health supervision visits. Pediatrics. 2013;132(6):1037–46.
Edwards A, Elwyn G, Gwyn R. General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):749–52.
Marteau TM. Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. Br J Soc Psychol. 1989;28(1):89–94.
Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998;76(2):149–88.
Lewandowsky S, Ecker UK, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J. Misinformation and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol Sci Pub Interest. 2012;13(3):106–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Di Bartolo, C.A., Braun, M.K. (2017). Incorporating Research into Healthcare Decisions. In: Pediatrician's Guide to Discussing Research with Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49547-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49547-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49546-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49547-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)