Forestry and Resilience to Climate Change: A Synthesis on Application of Forest-Based Adaptation Strategies to Reduce Vulnerability Among Communities in Sub-Saharan Africa
Forests and trees outside forests play an important role on mitigation of climate change through sequestering of carbon from the atmosphere. However, little has been documented on the role of forestry in adaptation to climate change. The objective of this paper was therefore to identify and analyse forest-based adaptation strategies employed in sub-Saharan Africa that have the potential of enhancing resilience of vulnerable communities to the impacts of climate change, with a view of recommending them for up-scale and adoption. The study employed both desk review approach and primary data collection through focused group discussion from 12 African countries. A review of selected studies commissioned by African forest Forum in sub-Saharan Africa was undertaken and synthesis carried out to delineate role of forestry in improving resilience to climate change to various forest ecosystems and people. It also builds from review of related reports and other publications on forestry as relates to climate change. The study revealed forest and tree-based systems in the context of sustainable forest management plays a significant role on disaster risk reduction and abatement to impacts of climate change. Specifically, tree planting and forest conservation aid protection of soil and land against detrimental impacts of flooding. Rehabilitation of degraded lands and forests through tree planting and good forest management practices enhances water quality and other vital environmental services. Such benefits associated with forests and tree-based systems improve capacity of communities in upstream and downstream to ameliorate impacts of climate change. Overall, the adaptation strategies such as: sustainable forest management (SFM); agroforestry systems; forestry and food production; commercial forestry; and other ecosystem based interventions enhance resilience among the vulnerable communities in the sub-Saharan Africa. The development of appropriate institutions, policy and legal frameworks that support national initiatives such as National Adaptation Programmes of Actions (NAPAs), forest based Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) as well as NDCs and other coping mechanisms that integrate both adaptation and mitigation remains vital in strengthening resilience of vulnerable social groups and biophysical systems to the impacts of climate change.
KeywordsClimate change Resilience Adaptation Vulnerability Coping mechanisms
The authors wish to express their sincere appreciation to the Government of Switzerland through Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) for providing financial support to implement African forests, people and climate change project in Africa that resulted to development of this paper. The authors also extend their sincere appreciation to Executive Secretary, of African Forest Forum (AFF), Prof. Godwin Kowero for the stewardship of the Secretariat and technical backstopping on the implementation of the project. The authors also acknowledge the support received from African governments where trainings were conducted and collection of primary data. Finally, feedback review provided that shaped this paper is highly appreciated.
- Bhaskar, V., Christoph, W., & Stephanie, M. (Eds.). (2015). Forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition. A Global Assessment Report. IUFRO World Series Volume 33. Vienna. 172 p.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2013). Forests, food security and gender: Linkages, disparities and priorities for action. Background paper for the International Conference on Forests for Food Security and Nutrition, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
- Lundgren, B. (2015). Forests and trees: Their roles and opportunities in Africa’s economic development, food security and environmental health. Nairobi, Kenya: African Forest Forum.Google Scholar
- Mugwe, J. N., & Mugendi, D. N. (1999). Use of leguminous shrubs for soil fertility improvement in sub-humid highlands of Kenya. In J. S. Tenywa, J. Y. K. Zake, P. Ebanyat, O. Semalulu, & S. T. Nkalubo, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Soil Science Society of East Africa conference (pp. 194–198). Kampala, Uganda, 6–10 September 1999Google Scholar
- Nyambura, B., & Nhamo, G. (2014). CDM projects and their impacts on sustainable development: A case study from Kenya. Environmental Economics, 5(1).Google Scholar
- Oeba, V. O. & Larwanou, M. (2015). Opportunities and prospects of forest based CDM and REDD+ projects for sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Oral paper presented during fifth conference on climate change and development in Africa (CCDA-V); Africa sustainable development and climate change; prospects of Paris and beyond, Victoria Fall, Zimbabwe, October 28–30, 2015.Google Scholar
- Risto S., Alexander B., & Pia K. (Eds.). (2009). Adaptation of forests and people to climate change. A Global Assessment Report. P. IUFRO World Series Volume 22. Helsinki. 224 p.Google Scholar
- Romero, M. Z., Traerup, S., Wieben, E., Moller, L. R., & Koch A. (2013). Economics of forest and forest carbon projects-translating lessons learned into national REDD+ implementation. Technical report.Google Scholar
- Tanzania Natural Resource Forum (TNRF). (2011). REDD realities: Learning from REDD pilot projects to make REDD work.Google Scholar
- Thompson, I., Mackey, B., McNulty, S., & Mosseler, A. (2009). Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ec retariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Technical Series no. 43, 67 pages.Google Scholar
- Torquebiau, E. (2000). A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences/Life Sciences, 323, 1009–1017.Google Scholar
- Zomer, R. J., Trabucco, A., Coe, R., & Place, F. (2009). Trees on farm: Analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF: Working Paper No 89.Google Scholar