Corporations, Taxation and Responsibility: Practical and Onto-Analytical Issues for Morphogensis and Eudaimonia – A posse ad esse?

  • Jamie MorganEmail author
  • William Sun
Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)


The reproduction of the corporation and its legal person status has become something of a self-reinforcing tendency. The law accepts and works with the ambiguity and contradictions of a non-conscious immaterial entity that has legal person status. It does so in order to manage difference. There is, however, a difference between managing difference and preventing increasing disintegration of a system over time. The problem of disintegration creates issues regarding how one addresses specific problems of growing corporate power. Tax avoidance is one important area to address. Corporate tax avoidance is antithetical to human flourishing and also part of a system of human harm. As such, addressing tax avoidance has significance for any concept of Eudaimonia and the Morphogenic Society.


Corporate tax avoidance Unitary taxation Eudaimonia Morphogenic Society 


  1. Aldrick, P. (2015). Business leaders must do their fair share to protect capitalism. The Times November 4th.Google Scholar
  2. Allingham, M., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M. S. (2013). Social morphogenesis and the prospects of morphogenic society. In M. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer, M. S. (2014). The generative mechanism re-configuring late modernity. In M. Archer (Ed.), Late modernity. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer, M. S. (2015). How agency is transformed in the course of social transformation: Don’t forget the double morphogenesis. In M. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis: Generative mechanisms transforming late modernity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Bainbridge, S. (2012). Corporate governance after the financial crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakan, J. (2005). The corporation (new ed.). London: Constable and Robinson.Google Scholar
  9. Buxton, N., & Hayes, B. (Eds.). (2016). The secure and the dispossessed. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coffee Jr., J. (1981). “No soul to damn, no body to kick,”: An unscandalized inquiry into the problem of corporate punishment. Michigan Law Review, 79(3), 386–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colledge, B., Morgan, J., & Tench, R. (2014). The concept(s) of trust in late modernity, the relevance of realist social theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(4), 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corporate Reform Collective. (2014). Fighting corporate abuse: Beyond predatory capitalism. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  13. Drutman, L. (2015). The business of america is lobbying: How corporations became politicized and politics became more corporate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gillies, D. (2015). Paul mason’s postcapitalism. Real World Economics Review, 73, 110–119.Google Scholar
  15. Gorski, P. (2015). Causal mechanisms: lessons from the life sciences. In M. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis: Generative mechanisms transforming late modernity. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Haldane, A. (2015). ‘Who owns a company?’ Speech, University of Edinburgh Corporate Finance Conference, May 22nd; Bank of England PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  17. Ireland, P. (1999). Company law and the myth of shareholder ownership. The Modern Law Review, 62(1), 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katz, A. (2015). The influence machine: The US chamber of commerce and the corporate capture of american life. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  19. Kay, J. (2015). ‘Shareholders think they own a company – They are wrong,’ Financial Times November 10th.Google Scholar
  20. KPMG. (2013). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting 2013 KPMG; accessed 7th Dec 2015; available at:
  21. Lawson, T. (2014). ‘A speeding up of the rate of social change? Power, technology, resistance, globalization and the good society’ In M. Archer (Ed.), Late modernity. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Lawson, T. (2015). The modern corporation: The site of a mechanism (of global social control) that is out-of-control. In M. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis: generative mechanisms transforming late modernity (pp. 206–230). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Lazonick, W. (2015). ‘Stock buybacks: From retain-and-reinvest to downsize-and-distribute,’ Center for Effective Public Management at Brookings, April; accessed 18th August, available at:
  24. Luttmer, E., & Singhal, M. (2014). Tax morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morgan, J. (2009). Private equity finance: Rise and repercussions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morgan, J. (2015). Piketty’s calibration economics: Inequality and the dissolution of solutions? Globalizations, 12(5), 803–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan, J. (2016a). Corporation tax as a problem of MNC organizational circuits: The case for unitary taxation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(2), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan, J. (2016b). Paris COP21: Power that speaks the truth? Globalizations, 13(6), 943–951.Google Scholar
  29. Morgan, J., & Sheehan, B. (2015). Has reform of global finance been misconceived? Policy documents and the Volcker Rule. Globalizations, 12(5), 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murphy, R. (2015). The Joy of tax: How a fair tax system can create a better society. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
  31. Pagano, U. (2010). Legal persons: The evolution of fictitious species. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(1), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palan, R. (2002). Tax havens and the commercialization of state sovereignty. International Organization, 56(1), 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Picciotto, S. (2011). Regulating global corporate capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  35. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  36. Robe, J. (2011). The legal structure of the firm. Accounting, Economics and Law, 1(1), 2–86.Google Scholar
  37. Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2014). Global wealth chains in the international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2015). How activists use benchmarks: Reformist and revolutionary benchmarks for global economic justice. Review of International Studies, 41(5), 887–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seabrooke, L. and Wigan, D. (2016) Powering ideas through expertise: Professionals in global tax battles Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 357–374.Google Scholar
  40. Sharman, J. (2010). Offshore and the new international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sikka, P. (2015). No accounting for tax avoidance. Political Quarterly, 86(3), 427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tench, R., Sun, W., & Jones, B. (Eds.). (2012). Corporate social irresponsibility volume 4: A challenging concept. Emerald: Bingley.Google Scholar
  43. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2015). The corporate criminal: Why corporations must be abolished. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Veldman, J., & Willmott, H. (2013). What is the corporation and why does it matter? Management, 16(5), 605–620.Google Scholar
  45. Wells, C. (2001). Corporations and criminal responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, second edition.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, K. (2000). From shareholder value to present-day capitalism. Ecology and Society, 29(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and LawLeeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations