Some Reservations About Flourishing

  • Douglas V. PorporaEmail author
Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)


I am grateful to all my friends and colleagues associated with critical realism who have been trying to introduce a value-orientation in the social sciences by way of building on Aristotle’s notion of eudaimonia, often translated as flourishing. Although ultimately I come out in support of this move, I do not consider it the only way to incorporate values within the social sciences and, as my title suggests, I hold some serious reservations about it. This chapter explores those reservations.

As some commentators note, the genre of my argument seems to toggle back and forth between “confessional” and “shared reason.” At points, I seem simply to be saying that, as a Christian, I personally have doubts about “flourishing” talk. At other points, I seem to be wanting to convince everyone on reasoned grounds that flourishing thinking doesn’t really work. Actually, I see no contradiction as I make no appeal to faith. Rather I am pointing out that the flourishing paradigm is problematic from the standpoint of a different moral sensibility, one that I happen to hold.


Flourishing Social justice Moral idealism Virtue ethics Biblical ethics 


  1. Barber, B. (1995). Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  2. Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bhaskar, R. (1994). Plato, etc.: Problems of philosophy and their resolution. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bhaskar, R. (2008). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bhaskar, R. (2012). The philosophy of metareality: Creativity, love and freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Collier, A. (2004). In defence of objectivity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Donati, P., & Archer, M. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality: The care of the self. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. Frankl, V. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  10. Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gorski, P. S. (2013). Beyond the fact/value Distinction: Ethical naturalism and the social sciences. Society, 50, 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haidt, J. (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Hartwig, M. (2007). Dictionary of critical realism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Ignatieff, M. (2003). Human rights as politics and idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Joas, H. (2013). The sacredness of the person. A new genealogy of human rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Keat, R., & Urry, J. (1975). Social theory as science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Maritain, J. (1973). Person and the common good. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  18. Norrie, A. (2012). The scene and the crime: Can critical realists talk about good and evil? Journal of Critical Realism, 11(1), 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norrie, A. (2015). Critical realism and the metaphysics of justice. Paper presented at 2015 meetings of the International Association of Critical Realism, South Bend, Indiana.Google Scholar
  20. Pinker, S. (2012). The better angels of our nature. Why violence has declined. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Porpora, D. (2001). Landscapes of the soul: The loss of moral meaning in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Porpora, D. (2004). The human project. In M. Archer, A. Collier, & D. Porpora (Eds.), Transcendence: Critical realism and God (pp. 155–167). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Porpora, D. (2015). Reconstructing sociology: The critical realist approach. Cambridge University Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sidgwick, H. (1981). The methods of ethics. New York: Hackett.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, C. (2009). Does naturalism warrant a belief in universal benevolence and human rights? In J. Schloss & M. J. Murray (Eds.), Scientific, philosophical and theological reflections on the origin of religion (pp. 293–317). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, C. (2010). What is a person? Rethinking humanity, social life, and the moral good from the person up. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, C. (2014). The paradox of generosity: Giving we receive, grasping we lose. Oxford University Press: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, C. (2015). To flourish or self-destruct: A personalist theory of human goods, motivations, failure, and evil. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor, C. (1994). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Turner, B. (1993). Outline of a theory of human rights. Sociology, 27(3), 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations