Human Flourishing and Human Morphogenesis: A Critical Realist Interpretation and Critique

Chapter
Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)

Abstract

Critical Realists have long argued that social science has an axiological concern with “human flourishing.” But they have rarely spelt out what they mean by this term. It is urgent that they do so, in order to respond effectively to the post-humanist movement’s appropriation of the flourishing concept. This article sketches a theory of human flourishing that is: (1) rooted in the Aristotelian tradition that underlies most versions of CR; (2) compatible with central tenets of CR such as “emergence”, “ontological stratification”, “actualism” and “transcendence”; and (3) allows for a critical assessment of the posthumanist vision. The conclusion reflects on the implications of human morphogenesis for social morphogenesis and social theory.

Keywords

Aristotelianism Eudaimonia Posthumanism Reflexive modernity Metaethics 

References

  1. Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, M. (2010). Routine, reflexivity, and realism*. Sociological Theory, 28(3), 272–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristotle. (1982). The politics (T. J. Saunders & T. A. Sinclair, Eds.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. (1996). The politics and the constitution of Athens (S. Everson, Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle. (2000). Nichomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). The science of evil: On empathy and the origins of cruelty. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bentham, J. (2000). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/yale/Doc?id=2001956
  10. Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Bhaskar, R. (1994). Plato etc.: The problems of philosophy and their resolution. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Bhaskar, R. (2000). From east to west: Odyssey of a soul. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhaskar, R. (2002). Meta-reality: The philosophy of meta-reality. New Delhi/Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54, 11–32.Google Scholar
  17. Collier, P. (2008). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, E. (1933). The division of labor in society. New York/London: Free Press/Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Durkheim, E. (1958). Professional ethics and civic morals. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Durkheim, E. (2001). The elementary forms of religious life, trans. Carol Closman, abridged with an intro. and notes by Mark S. Cladis. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elliott, C. (2003). Humanity 2.0. Wilson Quarterly, 27(4), 13–20.Google Scholar
  23. Foot, P. (2001). Natural goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life: Spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Hughes, J. J. (2012). The politics of transhumanism and the techno-millennial imagination 1626–2030. Zygon, 47(4), 757–776. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01289.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kant, I., & Gregor, M. J. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klare, M. (2001). Resource wars: The new landscape of global conflict. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Kraut, R. (1989). Aristotle on the human good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kraut, R. (2007). What is good and why: The ethics of well-being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lear, J. (1988). Aristotle: The desire to understand. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacIntyre, A. C. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  33. McIntosh, D. (2010). The transhuman security dilemma. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 21(2), 32–48.Google Scholar
  34. Moberg, G. (2000). Biological response to stress: Implications for animal welfare. In The biology of animal stress: Basic principles and implications for animal welfare (pp. 1–21). Wallingford: CABI Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nietzsche, F. (2008). Thus spoke Zarathustra (R. Pippin, Ed., A. D. Caro, Trans.) New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Plato. (1997). Complete works (J. M. Cooper & D. Hutchinson, Eds.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  40. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (2nd Beacon Paperback, Ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rand, A., & Branden, N. (1965). The virtue of selfishness. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  42. Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism (Expanded, Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation (pp. 20–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Sacks, O. (1998). The man who mistook his wife for a hat: And other clinical tales. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  45. Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  46. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, C. (2010). What is a person?: Rethinking humanity, social life, and the moral good from the person up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, C. (2015). To flourish or destruct. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vandenberghe, F. (2004). Posthumanism, or the cultural logic of global neo-capitalism. Complexitiés du posthumanisme: Pour une critique de la bio-économiquepolitique, 24–25, 55–132.Google Scholar
  51. Vandenberghe, F. (2014). What’s critical about critical realism? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Waldron, J. (2002). God, Locke, and equality: Christian foundations in Locke’s political thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations