Morphogenesis and Human Flourishing pp 261-276

Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)

The Will to Be: Human Flourishing and the Good International Society

Chapter

Abstract

Terms such as the ‘good society’, and human flourishing do not figure prominently in the discipline of International Relations. There may be pockets of the ‘good society’ across the international system, but it is not yet a notion that can be globalised. Moreover, what pockets of the good society that there are tend to be concentrated in the affluent parts of the Western world. Under global capitalism, the good society is defined in terms of dollars. At the international level, the ‘good society’ is expensive, life, it seems, is cheap! That said, I think there is much that could be said about the possibility of the ‘good international society’. This this chapter explores this idea and attempts to answer questions such as: What would such a society look like? What are the conditions of possibility for such a society? How might the international system be reformed in ways that enable human flourishing rather than human suffering? How exactly would the ‘good international society’ be structured? This chapter will proceed to unpack these issues and engage in some explicit utopian theorising about what the good international society might be.

Keywords

Human flourishing Good society Moral realism Morphogenic society Risk society War 

References

  1. Anderson, P. (1983). In the tracks of historical materialism. London: Verso Editions.Google Scholar
  2. Appleby, J. O. (2010). The relentless revolution: A history of capitalism (1st ed.). New York/London: Aufl/W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency, and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer, M. S. (2015). Generative mechanisms transforming the social order. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis. Springer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation . London.VersoGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Cartwright, N. (2007). Causal powers : What are they?: Why do we need them?: What can and cannot be done with them? London: Contingency and Dissent in Science Project.Google Scholar
  15. Coole, D. H., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donati, P., & Archer, M. S. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein, J. S. (2011). Winning the war on war: The decline of armed conflict worldwide. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  18. Gorski, P. (2016). Human flourishing and human morphogenesis: A critical realist interpretation and Critique. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Morphogenesis and the good life. Springer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  19. Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. London: Voyager Classics, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Kaufman, C. C. (2013). Getting past capitalism: History, vision, hope. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Krause, K. (2009). War, violence and the state. In M. Brzoska & A. Krohn (Eds.), Securing peace in a globalized world (pp. 183–202). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Marx, K., Engels, F., Lenin, V. I.′i., & Borodulina, T. (1972). On historical materialism: A collection. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Milne, Seumas. 2009. US foreign policy is straight out of the mafia. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/07/noam-chomsky-us-foreign-policy. Accessed 19 Dec 2015.
  24. Morgenthau, H. J. (1978). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (5th rev ed.). New York: Knopf/Aufl.Google Scholar
  25. Morton, A. D. (2005). The age of absolutism: Capitalism, the modern states-system and international relations. Review of International Studies, 31(03), 495–517. doi:10.1017/S0260210505006601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neal, L., & Williamson, J. G. (2014). The Cambridge history of capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  28. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  29. Porpora, D. (2016). Some reservations about flourishing. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Morphogenesis and the good life. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Ricks, T. E. (2006). Fiasco: The American military adventure in Iraq. New York/London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rosen, James. 2011. Why George W. Bush is the Arab Spring’s forgotten man. McClatchy.http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article24718339.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2015.
  32. Rosenberg, Justin. 2015. International relations in the prison of political science: Is there a way out? In E.H. Carr Annual Lecture. Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
  33. Security Global. 2016. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/. Accessed 5 May 2016.
  34. Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: A defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soper, K. (2001). Realism, humanism and the politics of nature. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 98(December), 55–71.Google Scholar
  36. Speer, J. P. (1968). Hans Morgenthau and the world state. World Politics, 20(2), 207–227. doi:10.2307/2009796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spruyt, H. (2002). The origins, development, and possible decline of the modern state. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 127–149. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.101501.145837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wendt, A. (2003). Why a world state is inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491–542. doi:10.1177/135406610394001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wight, C. (2001). The continuity of change, or a change in continuity? International Studies Review, 3(1), 81–89. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wight, C. (2004). Theorizing the mechanisms of conceptual and semiotic space. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wight, C. (2013). Morphogenesis, continuity and change in the international political system. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (pp. 85–104). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wight, C. (2015). Mechanisms and models: Some examples from international relations. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Generative mechanisms transforming the social order. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Young, J. (2007). The vertigo of late modernit. Los Angeles/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  45. Žižek, S. (2012). Trouble in paradise: From the end of history to the end of capitalism. London Review of Books, 35(14), 11–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Government and International RelationsUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations