AutoPlay: Unfolding Motivational Affordances of Autonomous Driving
The AutoPlay prototypes have been designed to explore the implementation of non-driving activities into the context of a future autonomous driving situation. The conceptual design goal was to maintain a pleasurable situational awareness of the inactive driver by integrating the driving context as a meaningful input into the interaction system. In this chapter, we introduce the design of three experimental applications for autonomous driving and report on explorative user studies conducted to investigate the impact of the three AutoPlay prototypes: AutoGym, an in-car exertion game that translates car speed and traffic situations into an individual exercise program. AutoJam, a touch sensitive steering wheel cover to generate interactive music experiences in a creative interplay with car’s driving dynamics. AutoRoute, a discovery application for future urban commuting in autonomous cars that enables an exploration of the city based on spontaneous routing and rerouting. Furthermore, we reflect on the outcome of the user studies and propose three motivational affordances of autonomous driving: drivability, performability, and explorability. Each of these concepts, help to understand the motivational possibilities of the autonomous driving situation and facilitates a meaningful alignment of interaction systems and the driving context. We discuss the underlying concepts of the three affordances by relating them to the experiences identified in the user studies. Subsequently the contribution of this chapter is twofold: (1) We introduce the AutoPlay prototypes as inspirational concepts for aligning non-driving activities with the autonomous driving context and (2) we propose three motivational affordances as design targets for the implementation of non-driving activities in order to initiate a broader discussion on the pleasures of autonomous driving beyond instrumental motives.
KeywordsUser Study Situational Awareness Adaptive Cruise Control Traffic Situation Steering Wheel
- Alt, F., Kern, D., Schulte, F., et al. (2010). Enabling micro-entertainment in vehicles based on context information. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 117–124). ACM.Google Scholar
- Baltodano, S., Sibi, S., Martelaro, N., et al. (2015). The RRADS platform: A real road autonomous driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 281–288). ACM.Google Scholar
- Beattie, D., Baillie, L., Halvey, M., McCall, R. (2013). Maintaining a sense of control in autonomous vehicles via auditory feedback. In Proceedings of PQS Conference, Austria.Google Scholar
- Beattie, D., Baillie, L., Halvey, M., McCall, R. (2014). What’s around the corner? enhancing driver awareness in autonomous vehicles via in-vehicle spatial auditory displays. In NordiCHI’14 (p. 10). ACM.Google Scholar
- Diefenbach, S., Kolb, N., & Hassenzahl, M. (2014). The “Hedonic” in Human-Computer Interaction—History, Contributions, and Future Research Directions. In Proceedings of the DIS 2014, pp. 305–314. doi: 10.1145/2598510.2598549.
- Eckoldt, K., Knobel, M., Hassenzahl, M., & Schumann, J. (2012). An experiential perspective on advanced driver assistance systems. Information Technology, 54, 165–171. doi: 10.1524/itit.2012.0678.
- Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1975). The presentation of self in everyday life.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Holopainen, J., & Stain, M. (2015) Dissecting playfulness for practical design. Gameful World Approaches, Issues, Appl 419.Google Scholar
- Koslowsky, M., & Kluger, A. N. (1995). Commuting stress: Causes, effects and methods of coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Krome, S. (2017a). AutoGym: An exergame for autonomous driving. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Krome, S. (2017b). Autojam: Exploring interactive music experiences in stop-and-go traffic. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Krome, S. (2017c). AutoRoute: Designing pleasurable commuting experiences for future autonomuos driving. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Krome, S., Goddard, W., Greuter, S., et al. (2015). A context-based design process for future use cases of autonomous driving: Prototyping AutoGym. In AutomotiveUI 2015.Google Scholar
- Krome, S., Walz, S. P., Greuter, S. (2016). Contextual inquiry of future commuting in autonomous cars. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3122–3128). ACM.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events ? Testing 10 Candidate Psychological Needs, 80, 325–339. doi: 10.1037//O022-3518.104.22.1685.
- Sicart, M. (2014). Play matters. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stenros, J. (2015). Playfulness, play, and games: A constructionist ludology approach.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’07 493. doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240704.