Skip to main content

Debt Neutrality Without Altruism: Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods as ‘Operative Linkages’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods

Abstract

In this paper an overlapping-generations model in which generations make voluntary contributions to a public good is considered. It is described how the supply and the cost sharing of financing the public good develop in a conflict between young and old generations. It is shown that, due the strategic effects of present savings on future private and public consumption levels, generations are ‘operatively linked’. As a consequence, an intergenerational income redistribution via public debt is neutral with respect to the intertemporal resource allocation. This result has two implications: First, it suggests that the Warr Neutrality Theorem in the static standard model of voluntary public good provision can be extended to a dynamic context. Second, it shows that the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem can hold even in the absence of altruism.

We have benefitted from valuable comments and criticism of an anonymous referee and by Dirk Rübbelke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a discussion of the conditions under which Ricardian Equivalence is valid see, for example, Brennan and Buchanan (1980).

  2. 2.

    For a simpler and more elegant proof see Cornes and Sandler (1984).

  3. 3.

    This neutrality result holds even for special cases of distortionary tax-subsidy schemes, see Bernheim (1986), Andreoni (1988) or Buchholz et al. (2006). Examples of non-neutral tax-subsidy schemes are provided by Boadway et al. (1989), Nett and Peters (1993), and Andreoni and Bergstrom (1996).

  4. 4.

    See Rebelein (20022006) for a similar line of reasoning. He presents a two-period, two-consumer model with one-sided altruism. While a child tries to manipulate the size of its parent’s bequest strategically, the parent seeks to minimize this impact. He shows that even if parents as well as their children behave strategically, Ricardian Equivalence remains active.

  5. 5.

    Cf. Cornes and Sandler (1984), Bergstrom et al. (1986) or Bernheim (1986).

  6. 6.

    For the idea of social contracts to enforce cooperation between generations see Kotlikoff et al. (1988).

  7. 7.

    This is the typical characterization of individually rational behavior in the presence of a public good. Collectively rational behavior would require the adjustment of the sum of the young and the old generation’s MRS to the relative price of the public good.

  8. 8.

    This is known as a standard result from demand theory with logarithmic utility functions.

  9. 9.

    We assume that D is sufficiently small as to guarantee interior Nash equilibria in all periods.

  10. 10.

    The assumption that the term of the credit ends in the same period as public good provision is not critical. Our results would be preserved for any interval [t + 1, S] with S ≤ T.

  11. 11.

    Cf. Eqs. (6) and (19) or in more detail (Cornes and Hartley 2007, p. 212).

  12. 12.

    A similar observation was made by Carmichael (1982).

References

  • Abel, A. B., & Bernheim, B. D. (1992). Fiscal policy with impure intergenerational altruism. Econometrica, 59, 1687–1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1988). Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 35, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., & Bergstrom, T. (1996). Do government subsidies increase the supply of public goods? Public Choice, 88, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1095–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D. (1986). On the voluntary and involuntary provision of public goods. American Economic Review, 76, 789–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., & Bagwell, K. (1988). Is everything neutral? Journal of Political Economy, 96, 308–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Pestieau, P., & Wildasin, D. (1989). Tax-transfer policies and the voluntary provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 39, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The logic of the Ricardian Equivalence theorem. Finanzarchiv, 38, 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, W., Cornes, R. C., & Peters, W. (2006). On the frequency of interior Cournot Nash equilibria in a public good economy. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, J. (1982). On Barro’s theorem of debt neutrality: The irrelevance of net wealth. American Economic Review, 72, 202–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. C., & Hartley, R. (2007). Aggregative public good games. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. C., & Sandler, T. (1984). Easy riders, joint production, and public goods. Economic Journal, 94, 580–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L., Persson, T., & Svensson, L. (1988). Social contracts as assets: A possible solution to the time-consistency problem. American Economic Review, 78, 662–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L., Razin, A., & Rosenthal, R. W. (1990). A strategic altruism model in which Ricardian Equivalence does not hold. Economic Journal, 100, 1261–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nett, L., & Peters, W. (1993). Financing public goods: Voluntary contributions and income taxation. Finanzarchiv, 50, 515–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelein, R. P. (2002). Ricardian equivalence survives strategic behavior. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 53, 148–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelein, R. P. (2006). Strategic behavior, debt neutrality and crowding out. Public Finance Review, 34, 148–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. (1983). The private provision of public goods is independent of the distribution of incomes. Economics Letters, 13, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Peters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haslbeck, C., Peters, W. (2017). Debt Neutrality Without Altruism: Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods as ‘Operative Linkages’. In: Buchholz, W., Rübbelke, D. (eds) The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics