Medical Legal Aspects of Regional Anesthesia: Legal Perspective
Understanding of regional anesthesia malpractice claims from a lawyer’s perspective is helpful in appreciating the legal process involved, including requirements for record-keeping, documentation of consent, and cases of practicing outside of guidelines.
Legal systems and definitions of malpractice vary around the world; however, for most jurisdictions, a successful claim requires that patient be able to establish that the anesthesiologist owed them a duty of care and that this duty was breached, resulting in injury.
Important legal issues can arise from lack of documentation of procedures, incomplete records, absence of or incomplete patient consent, issues with handover of care, and failure to adhere to recommended guidelines and practice standards.
KeywordsRegional anesthesia Litigation Malpractice Consent Guidelines
- 4.Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt HH. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:145–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Sanbar SS, Firestone MH. Medical malpractice stress syndrome. In: American College of Legal Medicine, editor. The medical malpractice survival handbook. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 9–15.Google Scholar