France: Regional Anesthesia Morbidity Study

Chapter

Key Points

  • The French SOS regional anesthesia (RA) service supplies clinical assistance to anesthesiologists facing a complication, collects information on complications, and provides advice on difficult cases prior to administration of anesthesia. Of over 158,083 blocks performed over a 10-month period, 56 major complications were identified by the SOS RA service.

  • Limitations of such a database are biased or under-reporting, difficulty in attributing a complication to regional anesthesia, and having a sample size large enough to allow meaningful analysis.

  • A systems analysis approach allows one to identify potential contributing factors to complications in regional anesthesia, including skill and experience of the anesthesiologist, lack of standardized aims and protocols, and failure to follow up and identify complications in a timely manner.

Keywords

France Morbidity study Protocols Regional anesthesia SOS RA 

References

  1. 1.
    Clergue F, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, Jougla E, Lienhart A, Laxenaire MC. French survey of anesthesia in 1996. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1509–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dripps RD, Vandam LD. Long-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics: failure to discover major neurological sequelae. J Am Med Assoc. 1954;156:1486–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phillips OC, Ebner H, Nelson AT, Black MH. Neurologic complications following spinal anesthesia with lidocaine: a prospective review of 10,440 cases. Anesthesiology. 1969;30:284–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Memtsoudis SG, Liu SS. Do neuraxial techniques affect perioperative outcomes? The story of vantage points and number games. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:501–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Amaberti R. Risk assessment and control require analysis of both outcomes and process of care. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:815–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Chapman EJ, Hewett D, Prior S, Strange P, Tizzard A. How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol. Br Med J. 2000;320:777–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vincent CA. Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:242–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Auroy Y, Narchi P, Messiah A, Litt L, Rouvier B, Samii K. Serious complications related to regional anesthesia: results of a prospective survey in France. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:479–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Bargues L, Ecoffey C, Falissard B, Mercier FJ, Bouaziz H, Samii K. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service. Anesthesiology. 2002;97:1274–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mercier FJ. Fluid loading for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: have we studied all the options? Anesth Analg. 2011;113:677–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Habib AS. A review of the impact of phenylephrine administration on maternal hemodynamics and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:377–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dogan Z, Bakan M, Idin K, Esen A, Uslu FB, Ozturk E. Total spinal block after lumbar plexus block: a case report. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014;64:121–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Auroy Y, Bargue L, Benhamou D, Bouaziz H, Ecoffey C, Mercier FJ, Samii K. Recommendation of the SOS ALR Group on the use of locoregional anesthesia. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000;19:621–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mulroy MF. Systemic toxicity and cardiotoxicity from local anesthetics: incidence and preventive measures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:556–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Di Gregorio G, Neal JM, Rosenquist RW, Weinberg GL. Clinical presentation of local anesthetic systemic toxicity: a review of published cases, 1979 to 2009. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:181–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ecoffey C, Oger E, Marchand-Maillet F, Cimino Y, Rannou JJ, Beloeil H. Complications associated with 27031 ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks: a web-based survey of 36 French centres. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:606–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barrington MJ, Watts SA, Gledhill SR, Thomas RD, Said SA, Snyder GL, Tay VS, Jamrozik K. Preliminary results of the Australasian Regional Anaesthesia Collaboration: a prospective audit of more than 7000 peripheral nerve and plexus blocks for neurologic and other complications. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:534–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barrington MJ, Kluger R. Ultrasound guidance reduces the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:289–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Orebaugh SL, Williams BA, Vallejo M, Kentor ML. Adverse outcomes associated with stimulator-based peripheral nerve blocks with versus without ultrasound visualization. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:251–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sites BD, Spence BC, Gallagher JD, Wiley CW, Bertrand ML, Blike GT. Characterizing novice behavior associated with learning ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:107–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zetlaoui PJ, Labbe JP, Benhamou D. Ultrasound guidance for axillary plexus block does not prevent intravascular injection. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wong CA. Editorial comment: cardiac arrest from local anesthetic toxicity after a field block and transversus abdominis plane block: a consequence of miscommunication between the anesthesiologist and surgeon and probable local anesthetic systemic toxicity in a postpartum patient with acute Fatty liver of pregnancy after a transversus abdominis plane block. A A Case Rep. 2013;1:77–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weiss E, Jolly C, Dumoulin JL, Meftah RB, Blanie P, Laloe PA, Tabary N, Fischler M, Le GM. Convulsions in 2 patients after bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks for cesarean analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:248–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Zeitz ID, Gray AT. Inadvertent femoral nerve impalement and intraneural injection visualized by ultrasound. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:627–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shah S, Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Cafferty MS, Moucha CS, Santos AC. Neurologic complication after anterior sciatic nerve block. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1515–7, table.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Kalberer F, Benz C. Acute and nonacute complications associated with interscalene block and shoulder surgery: a prospective study. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:875–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pumberger M, Memtsoudis SG, Stundner O, Herzog R, Boettner F, Gausden E, Hughes AP. An analysis of the safety of epidural and spinal neuraxial anesthesia in more than 100,000 consecutive major lower extremity joint replacements. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:515–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aguirre JA, Gresch D, Popovici A, Bernhard J, Borgeat A. Case scenario: compartment syndrome of the forearm in patient with an infraclavicular catheter: breakthrough pain as indicator. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1198–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amalberti R, Auroy Y, Berwick D, Barach P. Five system barriers to achieving ultrasafe health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:756–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département d’Anesthésie et RéanimationGroupe Hospitalier et Université Paris SudOrsayFrance

Personalised recommendations