Development and Methodology of a Registry of Regional Anaesthesia
Prospectively collecting regional anaesthesia procedure-related data allows monitoring of quality of care and identification of problematic practices that may lead to complications or adverse events.
Monitoring the quality and safety of regional anaesthesia is of paramount importance for informed patient consent and clinical decision-making.
Serious, adverse events are infrequent or rare in regional anaesthesia, therefore documenting them requires large patient samples.
Proactively monitoring for adverse events in new healthcare processes is recommended, one example being ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade. In the 2000s this emerged as a significant potential advance in clinical practice popularizing peripheral nerve blockade globally.
With periodic updates to practice guidelines and the ever-changing development of new approaches and technologies, use of a regional anaesthesia registry or database allows practitioners to make comparative analysis across time.
Clinical registries and databases facilitate qualitative, evidence-based assessment of practice, allowing less reliance on expert consensus or practice based on outdated dogma. Registries can also overcome limitations of cost and frequent lack of statistical powering associated with randomized clinical trials.
Registries/databases should be designed to collect as complete a dataset relating to the procedure as possible, including patient demographics, surgical information, anaesthetic type and dosage, and clinical effectiveness outcomes. Data recording and entry methods should be standardized and simple to use.
KeywordsProspective studies Registries Nerve block Development Methodology
The Australasian Regional Anaesthesia Collaboration
The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
The Australian and New Zealand Registry of Regional Anaesthesia
United States Institute of Medicine
The International Registry of Regional Anesthesia
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity
Peripheral nerve blockade
Postoperative nerve injury
Randomized controlled trials
- 1.Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
- 5.Gibbs NB. Safety of anaesthesia: a review of anaesthesia-related mortality in Australia and New Zealand 2006–2008. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists: Melbourne; 2012.Google Scholar
- 9.Brull R, Wijayatilake DS, Perlas A, Chan VW, Abbas S, Liguori GA, Hargett MJ, El-Beheiry H. Practice patterns related to block selection, nerve localization and risk disclosure: a survey of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:395–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gray AT. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current state of the art. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:368–73, discussionGoogle Scholar
- 18.Marhofer P, Chan VW. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current concepts and future trends. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1265–9, tablesGoogle Scholar
- 24.Bufalino VJ, Masoudi FA, Stranne SK, Horton K, Albert NM, Beam C, Bonow RO, Davenport RL, Girgus M, Fonarow GC, Krumholz HM, Legnini MW, Lewis WR, Nichol G, Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS, Schwamm LH, Shahian DM, Spertus JA, Woodard PK, Yancy CW. The American Heart Association’s recommendations for expanding the applications of existing and future clinical registries: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:2167–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Sheng S, Grover FL, Mayer JE, Jacobs JP, Weiss JM, Delong ER, Peterson ED, Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Klein LW, Shaw RE, Garratt KN, Moussa ID, Shewan CM, Dangas GD, Edwards FH. Predictors of long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (the ASCERT study). Circulation. 2012;125:1491–500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.Vikatmaa P, Mitchell D, Jensen LP, Beiles B, Bjorck M, Halbakken E, Lees T, Menyhei G, Palombo D, Troeng T, Wigger P, Venermo M. Variation in clinical practice in carotid surgery in nine countries 2005-2010. Lessons from VASCUNET and recommendations for the future of national clinical audit. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:11–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Sites BD, Taenzer AH, Herrick MD, Gilloon C, Antonakakis J, Richins J, Beach ML. Incidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity and postoperative neurologic symptoms associated with 12,668 ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: an analysis from a prospective clinical registry. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:478–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Ehrenfeld J, Kheterpal S, Abbey KR, Argalious M, Berman MF, Jacques PS, Levy W, Loeb RG, Paganelli W, Smith KW, Wethington KL, Wax D, Pace NL, Tremper K, Sandberg WS. The risk and outcomes of epidural hematomas after perioperative and obstetric epidural catheterization: a report from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Research Consortium. Anesth Analg. 2013;116:1380–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Jernberg T, Attebring MF, Hambraeus K, Ivert T, James S, Jeppsson A, Lagerqvist B, Lindahl B, Stenestrand U, Wallentin L. The Swedish Web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies (SWEDEHEART). Heart. 2010;96:1617–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Barrington MJ, Watts SA, Gledhill SR, Thomas RD, Said SA, Snyder GL, Tay VS, Jamrozik K. Preliminary results of the Australasian Regional Anaesthesia Collaboration: a prospective audit of more than 7000 peripheral nerve and plexus blocks for neurologic and other complications. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:534–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar