The Engineers’ Orchestra: A Conductorless Orchestra for Our Time

Chapter

Abstract

Performance skills—leadership, teamwork, and communication—can make or break an engineering career. Critical for success in life, they empower engineering students to reach their greatest promise as professionals, citizens, and individuals. But how to develop these skills in engineering students through experiential practice? Blurring the line between art and science offers one route via creative engagement: playing in a conductorless orchestra. A conductorless orchestra cultivates leadership, teamwork, and communication week-in and week-out during rehearsals and concerts. The only conductorless orchestra in the world composed of engineers currently resides at Olin College of Engineering, Needham, MA. Its rationale and blueprint nevertheless translate to other institutions. Developed over the past 14 years, that blueprint features a set of core values with clear expectations, a student-focused organizational structure, bonding and team-building pursuits, seriously fun musical games, and professional feedback. In short, the Engineers’ Orchestra offers engineer-musicians a project-based learning lab where they build—emotionally and intellectually—effective leadership, collaboration, and communication, while doing something they love—creating music.

Keywords

Conductorless orchestra Leadership, engineering Teamwork, engineering Communication, engineering Music, brain 

References

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (1997). Engineering criteria 2000 (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: ABET.Google Scholar
  2. Attaran, M., & Nguyen, T. (2000). Creating the right structural fit for self-directed teams. Team Performance Management, 6, 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon, T. (2004). You are how you behave: Customers can’t be fooled. Journal of Business Strategy, 25(4), 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartelme, L. (2005). The view from the trenches: An interview with Harvey Seifter, & Tim Stockil. Journal of Business Strategy, 26(5), 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belbin, R. M. (1993). Team roles at work. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Bilsel, A., Oral, O., & Pillai, J. (1998). Turkish and North American engineering programs: A comparative study of curricular emphases on mathematics, basic sciences, humanities and social sciences. IEEE Transactions on Education, 41(4), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boerner, S., & Gebert, D. (2012). Fostering artistic ensemble performance: Exploring the role of transformational leadership. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(3), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandsford, J., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.Google Scholar
  9. Catterall, J. (2005). Conversation and silence: Transfer of learning through the arts. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 1(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  11. Drath, W., & Palus, C. (1994). Making common sense: Leadership as meaning-making in a community of practice. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  12. Dunbar, R. (2012). On the evolutionary function of song and dance. In N. Bannan (Ed.), Music, language, and human evolution (pp. 201–214). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enrenberg, R., & Wolinsky, C. (2010). Music of the hemispheres: Playing instruments gives brains a boost. Science News, 178(4), 30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Erdil, E., & Bilsel, A. (2005). Curriculum design to revitalise electrical engineering education at Eastern Mediterranean University. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 42(3), 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felsing, C. (2007). Introducing Dr. Richard K. Miller, meet our honorary board members. American Suzuki Journal, 35(4), 17–19.Google Scholar
  16. Froyd, J. (2011). Problem-based learning and adaptive expertise. In 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 12–15 October 2011. Rapid City, SD: IEEE. pp. S3B-1–S3B-5.Google Scholar
  17. Froyd, J., Wankat, P., & Smith, K. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 1344–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gage, F. (2002). Neurogenesis in the adult brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(3), 612–613.Google Scholar
  19. Galal, A. (2008). New challenges facing the education sector in MENA. In The road not traveled: education reform in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 83–114). Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  21. Gilboa, A., & Tal-Shmotkin, M. (2012). String quartets as self-managed teams: An interdisciplinary perspective. Psychology of Music, 40(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grinter, L. (1994). Summary of the report on evaluation of engineering education [Reprinted from, Engineering Education, 46, 25–60)]. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 74–94. Retrieved June 13, 2013, from http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Grinter-Report-PDF.pdf. (Original work published 1955)
  23. Hackman, J. (2005). Rethinking team leadership or team leaders are not music directors. In D. M. Messick & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research (pp. 115–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Holtmaat, A., & Svoboda, K. (2009). Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchinson, S., Lee, L., Gabb, N., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Cerebellar volume of musicians. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 943–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khodyakov, D. (2008). Trust and control in counterpoint: a case study of conductorless orchestras. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  27. King, E. (2006). The roles of student musicians in quartet rehearsals. Psychology of Music, 34, 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LaBarre, P. (1998). Leadership—Ben Zander [online]. Fast Company. Retrieved May 16, 2013, from http://www.fastcompany.com/35825/leadership-ben-zander.
  29. Lee, D., Chen, Y., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Corpus callosum: Musician and gender effects. NeuroReport, 14, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehman, E. (1999). The berlin philharmonic orchestra. Harmony, 9, 11–25.Google Scholar
  31. Levitin, D. (2007). This is your brain on music. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  32. Lubans, J. (2006). The invisible leader: Lessons for leaders from the Orpheus Chamber Orchestra. OD Practitioner, 38(2), 5–9.Google Scholar
  33. Manning, C., Verenikina, I., & Brown, I. (2005). Learning with the arts: What opportunities are there for work-related adult learning? Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62(3), 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marotto, M., Roos, J., & Victor, B. (2007). Collective virtuosity in organizations: A study of peak performance in an orchestra. Journal of Management Studies, 44(3), 388–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, R. (2008). Beyond study abroad: Preparing engineers for the new global economy. Needham, Olin College of Engineering. Retrieved June 19, 2013, from https://olin.edu/about_olin/docs/pdf/study_abroad.pdf.
  36. Morrison, J., & Baxter, M. (2012). The ageing cortical synapse: Hallmarks and implications for cognitive decline. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 13, 240–250.Google Scholar
  37. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  38. National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: Strategies for revitalizing undergraduate education. In Shaping the future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Conference, 11–13 July 1996, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  39. O’Neal, J. (1990). The humanities and their effect on engineering education. IEEE Communications Magazine, 28(12), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oja, C. (2000). Making music modern: New York in the 1920’s. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Osburn, J., & Stock, R. (2005). Playing to the technical audience: Evaluating the impact of arts-based training for engineers. Journal of Business Strategy, 26(5), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patel, A. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 674–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patel, A. (2007). Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reader, S., & Laland, K. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99(7), 4436–4441.Google Scholar
  45. Root-Bernstein, R., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8(2), 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rouse, W., & Rouse, R. (2004). Teamwork in the performing arts. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(4), 606–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sammler, D., Koelsch, S., Ball, T., Brandt, A., Elger, C., Friederici, A., et al. (2009). Overlap of musical and linguistic syntax processing: Intracranial ERP evidence. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 1169, 494–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seat, E., Parsons, J., & Poppen, W. (2001). Enabling engineering performance skills: a program to teach communication, leadership and teamwork. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seifter, H. (2001). The Conductor-less Orchestra [online]. Leader to Leader, No. 21 Summer 2001. Retrieved June 1, 2013, from http://www.seifterassociates.com/uploads/4/0/5/9/4059165/drucker_foundation_-_the_conductorless_orchestra.pdf.
  50. Seifter, H., & Economy, P. (2001). Leadership ensemble: Lessons in collaborative management from the world-famous conductorless orchestra. New York: Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  51. Senge, P., Scharmer, C., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. (2005). Presence: Exploring profound change in people, organizations and society. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, R. (1996). Leadership as aesthetic process. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 30(4), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Terry, R., Masliah, E., Salmon, D., Butters, N., DeTeresa, R., Hill, R., et al. (1991). Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer’s disease: Synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Annals of Neurology, 30(4), 572–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tovstiga, G., Odenthal, S., & Goerner, S. (2005). Sense making and learning in complex organizations: The string quartet revisited. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Witkin, H., & Goodenough, D. (1977). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Behavior, 84(4), 661–689.Google Scholar
  56. Woods, D. (2006). Preparing for PBL [online]. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from http://www.chemeng.mcmaster.ca/pbl/pblbook.pdf.
  57. Zander, R., & Zander, B. (2000). The art of possibility. New York: Penguin.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Franklin W. Olin College of EngineeringNeedhamUSA

Personalised recommendations