Abstract
Creativity and interdisciplinary have been identified as critical skills for twenty-first century engineering education. The National Academy of Engineers termed our future engineering graduates as renaissance engineers. Changes for transformative learning in engineering education are taking place slowly across universities. To prepare the renaissance engineers of the future we look to the past, where renaissance artificers embraced art, technology, and science. This phenomenon was not isolated, but rather the supremely creative culmination of a long process. We are challenged to open the door to our students to an education that combines art, technology, and science as united phenomena which transform our classrooms into workshops and studios bursting with activity. Attempts to harness the power of creativity in the engineering classroom are more widespread than formal literature indicates. Creative faculty find ways to let our students take risks, collaborate, and create. We have been serenaded by students with songs about the virtues of thermodynamic principles. We have watched examples of scientific events played out in films. We have read poems penned by students that lyrically explain the four laws of thermodynamics. Through their innovative DNA, our students find beauty is truth in art and in engineering.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amabile, M. (2012). Componential theory of creativity. (Harvard Business School Working Paper, April, No. 12-096). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Bairaktarova, D., & Eodice, M. (2017). Thermodynamics in high energy rhymes and rhythms. Advances in Engineering Education. (Forthcoming).
Bradley, F. (2012). Creativity: Does place matter? London Review of Education, 10(2), 145–157.
Brown, P., Roediger, H., III, & McDonald, M. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coate, K., & Boulos, A. (2012). Creativity in education: Challenging the assumptions. London Review of Education, 10(2), 129–132.
Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364.
Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2014). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In The systems model of creativity (pp. 161–184). Netherlands: Springer.
Daniel, A. (2015). Full STEAM ahead. In Prism, March–April, 2015. American Society of Engineering Education.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.
Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2011). The innovator’s DNA: Mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
Galluzzi, P. (Ed.). (1996). Renaissance engineers. Firenze, Italy: Giunti Editore.
Grainger, T., Barnes, J., & Scoffham, S. (2004). A creative cocktail: Creative teaching in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(3), 243–253.
Greeno, J. G. (2011). A situative perspective on cognition and learning in interaction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), (Tran.), Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice (Vol. 1, pp. 41–71). Berlin: Springer.
Johansson, F. (2013). Medici effect: What you can learn from elephants and epidemics. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Johri, A., & Olds, B. (2011). Situated engineering learning: Bridging engineering education research and the learning sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151–185.
King, M. (2003). The renaissance in Europe. London, UK: Laurence King Publishing.
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Newell, A., & Kleiman, P. (2012). Doctors can dance. London Review of Education, 10(2), 133–144.
Ottino, J. M., & Morson, G. S. (2016). Building a bridge between engineering and the humanities. Chronicle of Higher Education.
Radcliffe, D. (2015). A tale of two steams. In Prism, December. American Society of Engineering Education.
Reznikoff, M., Domino, G., Bridges, C., & Honeymon, M. (1973). Creative abilities in identical and fraternal twins. Behavior Genetics, 3(4), 365–377.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860.
Thermodynamics Open Educational Recourse Creative Commons (CC). Retrieved Sept. 25, 2016, from http://ouopentextbooks.org/thermodynamics/
Wesselmann, E. D., Kassner, M. P., & Graziano, W. G. (2016). Personality’s top 40: An assignment to motivate students to apply personality concepts to their favorite songs. Teaching of Psychology, 43(2), 159–63.
Acknowledgements
The author wish to thank all students who participated with the creative projects and responded to surveys. I also wish to thank Kerry Magruder, for his involvement in the Spatial Visualization class and for stimulating many creative conversations on Renaissance engineering. Heartfelt thanks to the Director of Communications in the College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma, Karen Kelly, for documenting and tirelessly promoting all the artifacts and events assoicated with students creative work in the classes described in this chapter. Finally, special thanks go to Vice Provost of Faculty Development Simin Pulat, Dean Tom Landers, and Associate Dean John Antonio in the College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma for trusting my “atypical style of teaching”—your support contributed greatly to the success of the creative projects and students’ openness to creative ways of knowing in engineering, overall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bairaktarova, D. (2017). The New Renaissance Artificers: Harnessing the Power of Creativity in the Engineering Classroom. In: Bairaktarova, D., Eodice, M. (eds) Creative Ways of Knowing in Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49352-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49352-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49351-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49352-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)