Why Do People View Photographs on Instagram?

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10075)

Abstract

Drawing from the uses and gratifications framework, the aim of the present study is to examine the needs driving users to view photographs on Instagram, a popular photo-sharing social networking service. Data (N = 115) were collected from an online survey. A principal component factor analysis indicated that there were four cluster of needs. Specifically, we found that users were driven by diversion needs, surveillance needs, personal relationship needs, and voyeuristic needs. Further data analysis revealed and found that age, number of followers and number of followings on Instagram are related to the gratifications users seek on Instagram. Specifically, we found that older respondents were more likely to seek gratifications to meet personal relationship and surveillance needs. We also found that users with more followers viewed photos to seek for diversion and voyeurism needs. Implications of our work are also discussed.

Keywords

Photo-viewing Photo social network services Motivations Gratifications 

References

  1. 1.
    Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D.A., Gilbert, E.: Faces engage us: photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 965–974. ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goh, D.H.-L., Ang, Rebecca, P., Chua, Alton, Y.,K., Lee, C.S.: Why We Share: A Study of Motivations for Mobile Media Sharing. In: Liu, J., Wu, J., Yao, Y., Nishida, T. (eds.) AMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5820, pp. 195–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04875-3_23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Houghton, D., Joinson, A., Caldwell, N., Marder, B.: Tagger’s delight? Disclosure and liking in Facebook: the effects of sharing photographs amongst multiple known social circles (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martin, J., Martin, R.: History through the lens: every picture tells a story. Seeing is believing? approaches to visual research, pp. 9–22Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosen, C.: The image culture. New Atlantis 10, 27–46 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pittman, M., Reich, B.: Social media and loneliness: why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 155–167 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, C.S.: Exploring emotional expressions on youtube through the lens of media system dependency theory. New Media Soc. 14, 457–475 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Urista, M.A., Dong, Q., Day, K.D.: Explaining why young adults use myspace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Hum. Commun. 12, 215–229 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 12, 1143–1168 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milanovic, R.: The world’s 21 most important social media sites and apps in 2015. http://www.socialmediatoday.com/social-networks/2015–04-13/worlds-21-most-important-social-media-sites-and-apps-2015
  11. 11.
    Ruggiero, T.E.: Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Commun. Soc. 3, 3–37 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kharpal, A.: Facebook’s Instagramhits 400 m users, beats Twitter. In: CNBC (2015). http://www.cnbc.com/2015/09/23/instagram-hits-400-million-users-beating-twitter.html
  13. 13.
    Duggan, M.: Mobile messaging and social media – 2015, Pew Research Center (2015). http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/mobile-messaging-and-social-media-2015/
  14. 14.
    eBizMBA: top 15 most popular photo sharing sites (2016). http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/photo-sharing-sites
  15. 15.
    McQuail, D., Blumler, J.G., Brown, J.R.: The television audience: a revised perspective. In: McQuail, D. (ed.) Sociology of mass communcation, pp. 135–165. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1972)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, C.S., Goh, D.H.L., Chua, A.Y.K., Ang, R.P.: Indagator: investigating perceived gratifications of an application that blends mobile content sharing with gameplay. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61, 1244–1257 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ma, L., Lee, C.S., Goh, D.H.-L.: That’s news to me: the influence of perceived gratifications and personal experience on news sharing in social media. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 141–144. ACM, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanson, G., Haridakis, P.: Youtube users watching and sharing the news: a uses and gratifications approach. J. Electron. Publishing 11, 6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubin, A.M.: Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. J. Commun. 34, 67–77 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stafford, T.F., Stafford, M.R., Schkade, L.L.: Determining uses and gratifications for the Internet. Decis. Sci. 35, 259–288 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, C.S., Ma, L.: News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 331–339 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin, C., Salwen, M.B., Abdulla, R.A.: Uses and gratifications of online and offline news: new wine in an old bottle. In: Salwen, M.B., Garrison, B., Driscoll, P.D. (eds.) Online News and the Public, pp. 221–236. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rafaeli, S., Ariel, Y.: Online motivational factors: incentives for participation and contribution in Wikipedia. In: Barak, A. (ed.) Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Theory, Research, Applications, pp. 243–267. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, G.M.: Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 755–762 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park, N., Kee, K.F., Valenzuela, S.: Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychol. Behav. 12, 729–733 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Murray, S.: Digital images, photo-sharing, and our shifting notions of everyday aesthetics. J. Vis. Cult. 7, 147–163 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Calvert, C.: Voyeur Nation: Media, Privacy, and Peering in Modern Culture. Westview Press, Boulder (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blazer, S.M.: Rear window ethics: domestic privacy versus public responsibility in the evolution of voyeurism. Midwest Q. 47, 379 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 13, 210–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quan-Haase, A., Young, A.L.: Uses and gratifications of social media: a comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. B. Sci. Technol. Soc. 30, 350–361 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Q. 48, 240–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burke, M., Marlow, C., Lento, T.: Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 945–954. ACM, Boston, MA, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fabiola, B., Ignasi, B.: Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Res. 22, 57–74 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jang, J.Y., Han, K., Shih, P.C., Lee, D.: Generation like: comparative characteristics in Instagram. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4039–4042. ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lampe, C., Ellison, N., Steinfield, C.: A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. Social browsing. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 167–170. ACM, Banff, Alberta, Canada (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Papacharissi, Z., Mendelson, A.L.: An exploratory study of reality appeal: uses and gratifications of reality TV shows. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 51, 355–370 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gibbons, F.X., Buunk, B.P.: Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 129 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Instagram, FAQ (2016). https://www.instagram.com/about/faq/
  39. 39.
    Hargittai, E.: Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 13, 276–297 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and InformationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations