Skip to main content

Finding “Similar but Different” Documents Based on Coordinate Relationship

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Libraries: Knowledge, Information, and Data in an Open Access Society (ICADL 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10075))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2306 Accesses

Abstract

Traditional search technologies are based on similarity relationship such that they return content similar documents in accordance with a given one. However, such similarity-based search does not always result in good results, e.g., similar documents will bring little additional information so that it is difficult to increase information gain. In this paper, we propose a method to find similar but different documents of a user-given one by distinguishing coordinate relationship from similarity relationship between documents. Simply, a similar but different document denotes the document with the same topic as that of the given document, but describing different events or concepts. For example, given as the input a news article stating the occurrence of the Oregon school shooting, articles stating the occurrence of other school shooting events, such as the Virginia Tech shooting, are detected and returned to users. Experiments conducted on the New York Times Annotated Corpus verify the effectiveness of our method and illustrate the importance of incorporating coordinate relationship to find similar but different documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Follow-up is an article giving further information on a previously reported news event.

  2. 2.

    Note that verbs are compared in their base form.

  3. 3.

    http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtml.

References

  1. Allan, J., Papka, R., Lavrenko, V.: On-line new event detection and tracking. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 37–45 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, S., Xue, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., Fei, B., Su, Z.: Optimizing web search using social annotations. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2007, pp. 501–510 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carbonell, J., Goldstein, J.: The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 335–336 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Erkan, G., Radev, D.R.: Lexrank: graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 22, 457–479 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feng, A., Allan, J.: Finding and linking incidents in news. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 821–830 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feng, A., Allan, J.: Incident threading for news passages. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 1307–1316 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haveliwala, T.H.: Topic-sensitive pagerank: a context-sensitive ranking algorithm for web search. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 15(4), 784–796 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumaran, G., Allan, J.: Text classification and named entities for new event detection. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 297–304 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, Z., Wang, B., Li, M., Ma, W.Y.: A probabilistic model for retrospective news event detection. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 106–113 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: Textrank: bringing order into texts. Proc. EMNLP 2004, 404–411 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of ICLR Workshop (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: NIPS, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nallapati, R., Feng, A., Peng, F., Allan, J.: Event threading within news topics. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 446–453 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ohshima, H., Oyama, S., Tanaka, K.: Searching coordinate terms with their context from the web. In: Aberer, K., Peng, Z., Rundensteiner, E.A., Zhang, Y., Li, X. (eds.) WISE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4255, pp. 40–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11912873_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohshima, H., Oyama, S., Tanaka, K.: Sibling page search by page examples. In: International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, pp. 91–100 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salton, G., Wong, A., Yang, C.S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Snow, R., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A.Y.: Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL ’44, pp. 801–808 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, Y., Pierce, T., Carbonell, J.: A study of retrospective and on-line event detection. In: Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 28–36 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the following projects: Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Nos. 16H02906, 15H01718 and 24680008) from MEXT of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, M., Ohshima, H., Tanaka, K. (2016). Finding “Similar but Different” Documents Based on Coordinate Relationship. In: Morishima, A., Rauber, A., Liew, C. (eds) Digital Libraries: Knowledge, Information, and Data in an Open Access Society. ICADL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10075. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49304-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49303-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49304-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics